The BDS Perversion of Reality

Boycot_Jews_april_1_1933The Washington Free Beacon’s Adam Kredo reported on March 22, 2014, that “Pro-Palestinian activists at the University of Michigan have had the cops called on them for threatening pro-Israel students and staging a sit-in over the student government’s refusal to back an anti-Israel initiative to divest from the Jewish state. The threatening rhetoric used by these pro-Palestinian activists is part of a wider campaign by the University of Michigan’s pro-Palestine group Students Allied for Freedom and Equality (SAFE), which is part of the virulently anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement.”

The ultimate goal of the BDS movement is the destruction of the Jewish State. The intent is to weaken it through de-legitimization, economic sanction, and isolation. What the anti-Semitic radical-Left is seeking, while in cahoots with the Arab-Palestinians, is to bring down Israel through lawfare instead of warfare. The Arabs and Palestinians have tried wars, terror, and economic boycott, and failed. At this stage of warring against Israel, the BDS movement is using the language of human rights which the West is addicted to, and is placing the Palestinians on top of the so-called Third World anti-colonial struggle. Defending the Third World (regardless of its abuse of universal standards of human rights) is sacrosanct to the political-Left in the West. Israel therefore becomes a triple “sinner.” It is considered by the BDS activists as too powerful, too western, and too Jewish.

The Palestinians on the other hand, are the chosen “victims.” They are viewed as weak, uphold none of the Western values, and best of all, they fight the Jews. It does not matter that Israel alone respects the human rights of its citizens, or that Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East where religious freedom and individual rights are fully protected. Nor does it matter that the Palestinian leadership regularly violates the human rights of their fellow Palestinians, oppresses their Christian minority and/or jails and often kills LGBT individuals. In fact, Israel is a place of refuge for gays and lesbians fleeing persecution from the Palestinian territories, where Palestinian women run away from their abusive families for protection, and where Palestinian terrorists come to hospitals for life-saving care.

In April, 2011, Alex Kane, of the Brooklyn, NY, based The Indypendent, interviewed Omar Barghouti, a Palestinian-Arab propagandist and one of the architects of the BDS movement, Barghouti declared, “The movement has three demands: an end to Israel’s occupation of Palestinian lands and the dismantling of the separation barrier, equality for Palestinian citizens of Israel, and the Right of Return for Palestinian refugees. To meet these goals, the BDS movement advocates boycotting Israeli products and institutions, divesting from companies profiting from the occupation, and government sanctions on Israel.”

To the naïve and uninformed Western ear, the three demands might sound rather reasonable. It might be especially appealing to the ‘moral narcissist’ American university student who has yet to distinguish between Sunni and Shiite Islam, or be able to find Amman on the map. This “useful idiot” is precisely the kind of recruit the Arab-Muslim activists and their far-left allies seek. A student who would readily say “My mind is made up do not confuse me with facts or truth.” Some student’s ears perk up upon hearing the buzz words “human rights, equality, and occupation.” They don’t want to know about the Palestinian rejection of self-determination in the 1937 Peel Commission plan, or the U.N. Partition Plan of 1947. They want to be part of the “Rights culture,” and acquire status through their “moral purity.” Those students who do question the premise of anti-Israel actions are intimidated by the BDS thugs.

The “three demands” underlined by Barghouti clearly convey the intended liquidation of the only Jewish state, dressed in innocuous code words. The Jewish state is to be replaced with yet another Arab-Muslim state, added to the existing 22 members of the Arab League. All of them speak the same language – Arabic, profess the same religion – and Islam, share the same culture – male dominated and intolerant of non-Muslims. 

Now let us examine Barghouti’s demands, the first being “end the occupation.” According to U.N. Resolution 242, Israel is rightfully entrusted to administer “the territories” Israel captured from Jordan in the Six Day War of June, 1967, until a peace settlement is reached. Egypt and Jordan made peace with Israel, and Israel returned every inch of land it captured. Jordan gave up its right to speak for the Palestinians in 1988 hence the territories remained in Israel’s hands. Moreover, the Palestinians were not a state party included in Resolution 242. Resolution 242 stressed the word “territories” but not “all” territories, in exchange for peace. The Oslo agreement of 1993, devised a transition period, which would ultimately lead to a Palestinian state. In July, 2000, at the Camp David Summit, Yasser Arafat, the Chairman of the P.L.O. and Palestinian Authority rejected a peace settlement offered by Israel’s Prime Minister Ehud Barak. It would have given the PA 97% of the West Bank and Gaza, with a capital in East Jerusalem. President Clinton endorsed Barak’s offer. Arafat rejected it, and chose to launch the Second Intifada.

The West Bank (Judea and Samaria) included the Etzion Bloc of 22 Jewish villages which the Arab Legion illegally occupied in the 1948 War of Independence. The Jewish residents of these villages were either killed or escaped with their lives. Israel liberated these villages in 1967. It also included the Jewish Quarter in the Old City of Jerusalem, which the Jordanian Arab Legion occupied in 1948, and either killed or exiled its Jewish residents.

In January 2014, Australia’s Foreign Minister, Julie Bishop, said that the international community should refrain from calling settlements illegal under international law, without waiting for their status to be determined in a deal with the Palestinians. She also called the activists who seek to boycott Israel “anti-Semitic.”  Asked whether she agrees or disagrees with the near-universal view that Israeli settlements anywhere beyond the 1967 lines are illegal under international law, she replied: “I would like to see which international law has declared them illegal.”

The “separation barrier,” as it was called by Barghouti, is Israel’s response to Palestinian suicide bombers and terror inside Israel. America too has a barrier wall on the border with Mexico. The difference is that the latter is to prevent illegal immigrants from entering America, while Israel’s barrier is to save its citizens lives.

Equality for “Palestinian” citizens of Israel reveals Barghouti’s feeling towards the Jewish state. In Israel they are called Arab-Israeli citizens. Palestinians on the other hand, are not citizens of Israel. What Barghouti hints at is the campaign to undermine the Jewish nature of Israel from within, by seeking to transform the only Jewish state into a “state of all its citizens,” a formula by which to destroy the symbols of the Jewish state. In tandem with Palestinian equality, Barghouti, like Mahmoud Abbas has rejected recognition of Israel as the “State of the Jews.”

While seeking to boycott Israeli products, Barghouti and BDS folks have deliberately ignored the fact that 70% of the Palestinian Authority imports come from Israel.

Barghouti’s demand for the “Right of Return for Palestinian refugees” is a clear indication of the Palestinians unwillingness to make peace with Israel. The Right of Return is a euphemism for the demographic destruction of Israel, and the people of Israel will never agree to that.

The BDS activists seek to turn reality upside down, deliberately ignoring the facts underlined above. They are motivated by a single passion – hatred for Israel. It is time to call them what Julie Bishop of Australia named them, anti-Semites.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Subscribe to Frontpage’s TV show, The Glazov Gang, and LIKE it on Facebook.

  • wileyvet

    The muslims are always claiming that only defensive warfare is permitted in Islam. So anything they gain from that is theirs. Someone should remind them that the area of Judea and Samaria ended in Israeli hands as a result of a Defensive War when the Arabs of three countries attacked Israel and then lost the Six Day War. So how come it is not OK with them for Israel to keep it? Oh, and while we’re at it. Medina used to have a large, affluent, and influential Jewish population until they were systematically expelled one clan at a time. All their property was expropriated by the original Muslim terrorist, Muhammad, until finally the Banu Quirayza was the last, but they ultimately met a worse fate than the previous two clans. All the adult males were beheaded, the women and children enslaved, and their property turned over to the Muslims. Eventually the muslims cleansed Arabia of all Jews by A.D. 642. How about a right of return for the Jews of Medina and Khaybar?

    • TheSunDidIt

      Muslims will always lie, pure and simple. The matter is that they MUST lie to you to gain an advantage over you so that they can further the global caliphate. And if they DO NOT, then they’re not considered “good Muslims” and will be killed by their OWN groups much faster than a Crusader of 1000AD could do.

    • Nabukuduriuzhur

      After 911, I downloaded a copy of the Q’uran, translated by islamic experts into English.

      It only took a short time to find these and it’s only a fraction of the whole:

      2: 89)
      And kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from whence
      they drove you out, and persecution is severer than slaughter, and do
      not fight with them at the Sacred Mosque until they fight with you in
      it, but if they do fight you, then slay them; such is the recompense
      of the unbelievers.

      Then seize them and kill them wherever you find them; and against
      these We have given you a clear authority.

      And kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from whence
      they drove you out, and persecution is severer than slaughter, and do
      not fight with them at the Sacred Mosque until they fight with you in
      it, but if they do fight you, then slay them; such is the recompense
      of the unbelievers.

      Those who said of their brethren whilst they (themselves) held back:
      Had they obeyed us, they would not have been killed. Say: Then avert
      death from yourselves if you speak the truth. 169)
      And reckon not those who are killed in Allah’s way as dead; nay, they
      are alive (and) are provided sustenance from their Lord;

      Therefore take not from among them friends until they fly (their
      homes) in Allah’s way; but if they turn back, then seize them and
      kill them wherever you find them, and take not from among them a
      friend or a helper.

      You will find others who desire that they should be safe from you and
      secure from their own people; as often as they are sent back to the
      mischief they get thrown into it headlong; therefore if they do not
      withdraw from you, and (do not) offer you peace and restrain their
      hands, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them; and
      against these We have given you a clear authority

      The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His apostle
      and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they
      should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should
      be cut off on opposite sides

      So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters
      wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and
      lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up
      prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them; surely
      Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

      And do not kill any one whom Allah has forbidden, except for a just
      cause, and whoever is slain unjustly, We have indeed given to his
      heir authority, so let him not exceed the just limits in slaying;
      surely he is aided.

      Cursed: wherever they are found they shall be seized and murdered, a
      (horrible) murdering.

      Book four “the women” should have every feminist up in arms,
      because women effectively have no rights, but it’s surprising how
      many feminists like Islam.

  • Hass

    Yes, Julie Bishop, an excellent Politician. Great to have the Liberals of Oz take back Government after the disastrous and totally incompetent Labour party.

  • JVictor

    The virulent, violent, intense, inhumane hatred and disdain for the Jews makes absolutely no sense in human terms. Watching the systemic spread of antisemitism with an objective eye ought to convince even the most devout atheist that G-d is exists.

    • Nabukuduriuzhur


      I know of no greater proof of the existence of satan than the constant attacking of Hebrews by one group after another, over 4,000+ years. It’s not because of what Israelis do, but a hate of them because they exist.

      Such mindless hate of Israel over 4 millennia proves that something other than mere man is at work.

      • TexasRedNeck

        Its not man against man it is Satan rebelling against G-d, this is about to be brought to a climax very soon, once and forever.

  • wileyvet

    As I pointed out in my original post, Muhammad himself set the tone for the vilification of Jews starting with the tribes at Medina. The Koran is replete with verses that condemn them, and consistently portrays them as sneaky, untrustworthy, cursed etc. Muhammad conveniently could always come up with new revelations to incite Muslim wrath at the Jews, always providing a pretext for his next act against them. Of course it was always the wish of Allah, and he was just following orders. The anti Jewish hatred of today’s Muslims is the direct result of Mohammad’s virulent hatred and condemnation of the Jews of Arabia for rejecting him as their prophet and he was determined to teach them a lesson they would never forget. And he did. It is a lesson we should not forget either.

  • The Facts

    The photograph that accompanies this article indicates that the person who placed it there is living in the past. If one were to post modern examples of angry, racist graffiti against certain members of an Abrahamic faith, the graffiti would be written in Hebrew.

    • Drakken

      Still running your suck for the ragheads I see? Come on and put your man pants on and go join your muslim friends and get your hands dirty. Or can’t you be bothered to put your money where your jihadist loving mouth is?

      • The Facts

        You typed that already.

  • Gee

    “Third World anti-colonial struggle” – the Arabs are the biggest colonial power in the world. They occupy the largest series of colonies in the world.
    Arabs are from ARABIA. So why have they conquered, murdered, enslaved, and forced conversion of the natives from Morocco to Iraq?
    Now if they were truly anti-colonialists then they would support the native Jews from Judea


    Read “The Everlasting Hatred The Roots of Jihad” by Hal Lindsey available at amazon

  • The Facts

    Why would a reputable magazine delete a comment that the author is living in the past, but allow Drakken (Vincent Lager) to make death threats against me? This is quite puzzling. Why is a straightforward observation not permitted, but incessant death threats are? I question the integrity here.

  • Princeton67atCoxdotnet

    Having earned my masters and doctoral degrees at the University of California, Riverside, during the neolithic age, I am disheartened by the changing ethos of the institution. What was once black is now white. Now, UCR offers a course on “Israeli apartheid”.
    I can only wonder as to how a proposal to have a course on Islamic terrorism would be greeted…
    UCR also has an annual “Israeli Apartheid Week”. Would the establishment of a fund to promote “Palestinian Terrorism Week” be out of order?
    America has regressed. It is once more 1939. The S.S. St. Louis has been turned away. Tolerance, again, is a one-way avenue, much like the literal and metaphorical “Streets of New York”.

    • Princeton67atCoxdotnet

      The S.S. St. Louis was refused landing in Florida. It’s passengers, primarily Jews hoping to escape from Nazi Germany, could see the lights of Miami. So near. Yet so far. The passengers were sent back to the hopelessness of Europe. American Jews have had a rude awakening. Hatred never sleeps; it can only be dormant. It has awakened.