|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
It was bad enough when federal district judges were overruling the president, now they’ve moved on to the Supreme Court. And this baffles even Justice Elena Kagan.
The judge in question is Judge Brian Murphy, a Biden appointee, who decided he wasn’t going to give up trying to order around the Trump administration despite the minor matter that the Supreme Court had already issued its ruling.
“I do not see how a district court can compel compliance with an order that this Court has stayed,” Justice Kagan wrote.
There’s no constitutional way but some unbalanced judges have decided to take the checks and balances, run them over with a bulldozer and see what happens.
What’s currently happening is that the Supreme Court is trying to keep them in check. And even some Dems are baffled at their complete lawlessness in perpetrating a judical coup against every other legitimate constitutional institution.
This is why there needs to be a way to dismiss judges other than by impeachment.
Of course, if the Republicans in the House and Senate had the balls they could simply make his District go away and thus his judicial appointment redundant.
I have a way.
Unfortunately, Congress does not have the wisdom to pass my proposal.
— —
My idea is THIS ..m
Any judge who is overruled three times is AUTOMATICALLY removed. Period, and with no further comment.
Three is enough.
But as I said, they don’t have the balls, and the Democrats won’t do it, and next time they get in they’d overturn it.
I worked in the justice system for my entire career. There are matters of law to this day that different judges can see in different lights and still have both following the law. I know 3 strikes and you’re out seems wise, but even business law (the most boring but arguably the most important legal venue) often finds judges unsure of the law’s intent in new technology, businesses and contractual disagreements. The only reason the law works at all is that we assume SCOTUS appointments are tried under fire and have the wisdom necessary to adjudicate properly and Constitutionally. Having orders overturned means you’re learning, at best, and you’re an activist, at worst. It’s not grounds for removal if the order isn’t based on black letter law. That means, under your plan, good judges who simply need to mature on the bench would be lost.
As for the activists, the Constitution allows the Chief Justice of SCOTUS to remove bad actors from the bench for any reason falling under “bad behavior,” but Roberts is a chickenshit who’d rather gentlemanly manage America’s decline. What we need is a movement to pressure Justice Roberts into doing his damn job.
Congress has the power to remove an Article III judge. Do you mean that Roberts should refer rather than remove a judge?
Start impeachment even if losing because John will act then.start a DOJ investigation that too will start ball rolling. Or cap his ass and throw him to the alligators. Now that I strayed permanent.
They don’t need to be impeached. They can be fired by Congress for not serving “with good behavior.” The bar firing is lower and requires less procedure and fewer votes. Acting in good behavior is in the terms of their employment contract.
Time to arrest these judges – just like the judge who was arrested for helping an illegal escape the court room trial when ICE arrived – I’m sure Pam Bondi would have lots of fun doing so.
They are not “judges.” They are petty tyrants that think their “wisdom.” and importance is bigger than their pants.
ENOUGH! Do away with them….
Complete lawlessness, like in Ancient Rome, with a totally corrupt and biased judiciary.
One should never underestimate what a liberal jurist is capable of doing.
I’d rephrase that to :capable of “attempting.”
When a judges own self-importance and narcissism become evident, an investigation is warranted.
The trouble with all these Judges is they spend all their judicial time “Examining the Constitution” to see if the LAW or “ruling” they’re litigating can be MADE Legal, instead of “Examining the Law or ruling” to see if it IS Legal as defined by the Constitution! The Constitution is to be obeyed, not “interpreted”!
The perfect article … Short honest and well done
Any judge who cant abide by the U.S. Constitution should just resign and be a Hermit in the Mountains
Nah, they should be required to live in one of the inner urban hellhole ghettos they are working to create.
Without any of their privileges as judges or ex judges.