Somewhere deep underground there's a guy throwing darts at a big dartboard.


	Who's going to be the next victimhood group?


	Apparently,<a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/doctors-move-end-bias-overweight-patients-rcna29680"> fat people</a>.&nbsp;

<blockquote>
	
		Doctors often approach the practice of medicine with&nbsp;an anti-fat bias&nbsp;and struggle to communicate with patients whose weight exceeds what’s considered the normal range.
</blockquote>


	There's no such as "anti-fat bias".It's an unhealthy condition, much like any other, and the job of doctors is to point that out to patients.


	If someone is smoking two packs a day, is the doctor guilty of an "anti-smoking bias"? If they insist on having promiscuous unprotected sex, are the doctors "slut shaming" them?


	If the AMA doesn't want doctors to do their jobs, they can just jettison actual medicine and attribute everything to social conditions and capitalism.


	Like they're<a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10187303/American-Medical-Association-condemned-Orwellian-new-equity-document-pushes-CRT.html"> already doing</a>.

<blockquote>
	
		The American Medical Association has come under fire for publishing an 'Orwellian' guide to 'equity' that promotes&nbsp;critical race theory&nbsp;and pushes Marxism.

	
		AMA bosses published Advancing Health Equity on October 28, complete with a list of 'problematic' words physicians should stop using such as 'vulnerable,' 'high risk' and 'minority.' The document also criticizes meritocracy and individualism.&nbsp;&nbsp;

	
		The 54-page guide argues that physicians are obligated to eliminate 'health inequities' by considering their language and the political circumstances behind certain groups, rather than focusing on individuals.
</blockquote>


	So it's time for more equity.

<blockquote>
	
		To counter that, the Association of American Medical Colleges plans to roll out in June new diversity, equity, and inclusion standards aimed at teaching doctors, among other things, about respectful treatment of people diagnosed as overweight or obese.
</blockquote>


	DEI. Is there anything it can't fix?


	Embracing,&nbsp;“There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so" should work wonders for medicine.

AMA Will Use "Equity" to Fight "Anti-Fat" Bias Among Doctors

Somewhere deep underground there's a guy throwing darts at a big dartboard.


	Who's going to be the next victimhood group?


	Apparently, fat people.

AMA Will Use "Equity" to Fight "Anti-Fat" Bias Among Doctors

How deep in authoritarian fascism was the Biden administration last year?


	Faced with parental protests in schools, the Biden administration coordinated with the&nbsp;National School Boards Association to intervene. Here's <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/media/nsba-letter-called-national-guard-military-deployed">an earlier draft </a>of what that might have looked like.

<blockquote>
	
		Early demands from the&nbsp;National School Boards Association&nbsp;to the White House included calling for the deployment of the Army National Guard and the military police to monitor school board meetings, according to an early draft letter the organization's independent review released Friday.&nbsp;

	
		In contrast to the final version, the draft of the NSBA letter said, "We ask that the&nbsp;Army National Guard&nbsp;and its Military Police be deployed to certain school districts and related events where students and school personnel have been subjected to acts and threats of violence."&nbsp;
</blockquote>


	Did the NSBA realize it went too far, did someone in the Biden admin pull the plug on a proposal to deploy the National Guard?&nbsp;


	Consider the atmosphere.


	The Biden administration had engaged in an extended and unprecedented military occupation of Washington D.C. in response to the Capitol Riot despite condemning the much lesser response to Black Lives Matter assaults on the White House and D.C. landmarks. Forced to eventually shut down the occupation, someone in the administration may have contemplated using the National Guard to regularly shut down opposition political protests. This would have been the logical next step.


	Sending in the FBI was bad enough, but the Biden admin was playing at full-fledged&nbsp;fascism in '21.&nbsp;

Biden Admin Allies Contemplated Using National Guard at School Board Meetings

How deep in authoritarian fascism was the Biden administration last year?


	Faced with parental protests in schools, the Biden administration coordinated

Biden Admin Allies Contemplated Using National Guard at School Board Meetings

Considering crime rates under Soros DA Gascon, I didn't think any special motive was needed to explain the attempted assault on Dave Chappelle. There are any number of crazies wandering around Los Angeles and the internet. And as&nbsp;attack plots go, this one didn't seem too well thought out.


	But it looks like the motive <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10843403/Dave-Chappelles-attacker-speaks-time-says-triggered-comedians-jokes.html?ito=social-twitter_dailymailus">was political after all</a>.

<blockquote>
	
		The Los Angeles man&nbsp;accused of attacking Dave Chappelle&nbsp;said he was “triggered” by the comedian’s jokes about the LGBTQ community and homelessness — as he insisted he never wanted to harm the funnyman.

	
		In an exclusive jailhouse interview, Isaiah Lee told The Post that Chappelle should be more “sensitive” when it comes to the jokes he cracks.

	
		“I identify as bisexual … and I wanted him to know what he said was triggering,” Lee said Saturday at the Twin Towers Correctional Facility in Los Angeles, dressed in brown jail garb and sporting a sling on his broken right arm.

	
		“I wanted him to know that next time, he should consider first running his material by people it could affect.”
</blockquote>


	I'm sure that next time Chappelle will run his bits past random assailants before taking it on stage.


	Obviously the story would be very different if Lee had been a white male conservative offended by jokes. We would be having a loud, vocal, and very different conversaion. Instead it took the New York Post to find out his motive. Not because he was holding it back, but because the media didn't want to know.

Dave Chappelle Attacker Was Triggered By Him

Considering crime rates under Soros DA Gascon, I didn't think any special motive was needed to explain the attempted assault on Dave Chappelle. There are any

Dave Chappelle Attacker Was Triggered By Him

This is why his own people keep <a href="https://www.politico.com/newsletters/west-wing-playbook/2022/05/22/bidens-logistical-man-extraordinaire-00034257">cutting off </a>his microphone.

<blockquote>
	
		CNN’s&nbsp;KAITLAN COLLINS&nbsp;asked Biden a follow-up question Sunday about if he had a message to North Korean leader&nbsp;KIM JONG-UN. “Hello,” Biden said, before pausing a bit and adding: “Period.”

	
		While reporters were able to hear the president, clear audio and video were almost lost because the U.S. government cut off Biden’s microphone feed prematurely. Some of the mics still caught the response in a way that was usable with subtitles. But the government cutting off the audio early has been a frequent source of frustration for reporters.
</blockquote>


	Apparently, they didn't cut it off <a href="https://thehill.com/news/administration/3497693-biden-us-would-defend-taiwan-militarily-if-china-invaded/">soon enough</a>.

<blockquote>
	
		President&nbsp;Biden&nbsp;on Monday said the U.S. would be willing to defend Taiwan militarily if China were to try and take it by force.

	
		“Are you willing to get involved militarily to defend Taiwan if it comes to that?” Biden was asked at a press conference in Tokyo alongside the Japanese prime minsiter.

	
		“Yes,” Biden responded. “That’s the commitment we made. That’s the commitment we made.

	
		“Look, here’s the situation. We agree with the one China policy… but the idea that to be taken by force, just taken by force, is just not appropriate,” Biden continued. “It will dislocate the entire region and be another action similar to what happened in Ukraine.”
</blockquote>


	I don't necessarily object to the content of the answer so much as the fact that this is the latest in a series of <a href="https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/2021/08/biden-commits-defending-taiwan-quickly-takes-it-daniel-greenfield/">back and forths on Taiwan</a>.

<blockquote>
	
		A senior Biden administration official said on Thursday (Aug 19) that US policy on Taiwan had not changed after President Joe Biden appeared to suggest that the United States would defend the island if it were attacked, a deviation from a long-held US position of "strategic ambiguity"...

	
		"They are...entities we've made agreements with based on not a civil war they're having on that island or in South Korea, but on an agreement where they have a unity government that, in fact, is trying to keep bad guys from doing bad things to them," Mr Biden said.

	
		"We have made (and) kept every commitment. We made a sacred commitment to Article 5 that if, in fact, anyone were to invade or take action against our Nato allies, we would respond. Same with Japan, same with South Korea, same with Taiwan. It's not even comparable to talk about that."

	
		A senior Biden administration official said US "policy with regard to Taiwan has not changed" and analysts said it appeared that Mr Biden had misspoken.
</blockquote>


	Article 5 obviously <a href="https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/2021/10/biden-says-dont-worry-about-taiwan-based-daniel-greenfield/">does not</a> apply to Taiwan.


	Biden asserting that the United States would fight in defense of Taiwan is a pretty aggressive position. If you take that kind of position, you have to be willing to back it up. Putting all that credibility on the line and then having a staffer pull it back again makes it obvious that Biden is not mentally functioning and that American military deterrence has no credibility.

Biden is Back to Flip-Flopping on Taiwan

This is why his own people keep cutting off his microphone.


	
		CNN’s&nbsp;KAITLAN COLLINS&nbsp;asked Biden a follow-up question Sunday about if he had a

Biden is Back to Flip-Flopping on Taiwan

There's good reason for being suspicious about this Washington Post poll because it has black people echoing woke lefty talking points even when they clearly contradict previous polls, for example having black people dismiss more police in favor of lefty holistic solutions to crime.


	But let's zero in on this <a href="https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/3496738-75-percent-of-black-americans-fear-physical-attack-based-on-their-race-poll/">absurd and racist</a> result.

<blockquote>
	
		A new&nbsp;Washington Post-Ipsos poll&nbsp;found that 75 percent of Black Americans polled are worried that they or someone they care about will be physically harmed because they are black...
</blockquote>


	How often does that happen?


	We're not talking about staged white supremacist terror attacks like Buffalo or Charleston.

<blockquote>
	
		Seventy percent of Black Americans polled said they believed half or more white Americans hold white supremacist beliefs compared to 19 percent who believed fewer than half white Americans do.
</blockquote>


	That would be a widespread conviction that most white people are not only racist but white supremacists.


	In the breakdown, 35% believe that most white people hold white supremacist views, while another 27% say that half of white people do.


	Only 8% say very few.


	That's not a survey of racism, it's a racist survey.

A Very Racist Poll About Racism

There's good reason for being suspicious about this Washington Post poll because it has black people echoing woke lefty talking points even when they clearly

A Very Racist Poll About Racism

<div>
	
		[Order David Horowitz's new book, Blitz: Trump Will Smash the Left and Win, which was released June 2 by Humanix Books: <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Blitz-Trump-Will-Smash-Left/dp/1630061387?tag=breitbart035-20" rel="noopener external" target="_blank">Order Here</a>.]

	
		In this new video, David Horowitz appears on the One America News Network to discuss: The Racist Party, unveiling the real reason the Left libels Trump. Don't miss it!

	<div class="media_embed" height="315px" width="560px">
		<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/WEDe6dmK5L0" width="560px" height="315px" frameborder="0"></iframe></div>
</div>


	&nbsp;

Horowitz Video: The Racist Party

[Order David Horowitz's new book, Blitz: Trump Will Smash the Left and Win, which was released June 2 by Humanix Books: Order Here.]

	
		In this new video

Frontpage Mag

Horowitz Video: The Racist Party

Wondering what happened to your Disqus comments?

FPM Series

Disloyal Military

Progressive Fascists

Racist Mayors

The Point

AMA Will Use "Equity" to Fight "Anti-Fat" Bias Among Doctors

Biden Admin Allies Contemplated Using National Guard at School Board Meetings

Dave Chappelle Attacker Was Triggered By Him

Biden is Back to Flip-Flopping on Taiwan

A Very Racist Poll About Racism

Events