Shutting Down Pro-Israel Speech at Duke

Defending the Jewish state from lies is not allowed.

Richard L. Cravatts, Ph.D., a Freedom Center Journalism Fellow in Academic Free Speech and President Emeritus of Scholars for Peace in the Middle East, is the author of Dispatches From the Campus War Against Israel and Jews.

As if further evidence were needed for the hypocrisy about who may say what about whom on college campuses, the recent action by the Duke Student Government to withhold recognition to a new pro-Israel student group seems to confirm that academic free speech is not always free depending on who is speaking. On November 9th, DSG President Christina Wang made the outrageous decision to veto the recognition of Students Supporting Israel (SSI) after the group posted a response to an anti-Israel Duke sophomore, Elyana Riddick, who had captioned a now-deleted Twitter post about SSI by writing, "My school promotes settler colonialism."

"To Yana and others like her,” SSI posted on its Instagram account, “please allow us to educate you on what 'settler colonialism' actually is and why Israel does not fall under this category whatsoever. These types of narratives are what we strive to combat and condemn, which is why Duke's chapter of Students Supporting Israel has been officially established & is here to stay," the post read.

While it seems that denouncing Israel, as Ms. Riddick did, as a racist colonial occupier of stolen Arab land is perfectly acceptable, SSI’s response to her was obviously totally unacceptable, violating, it seems, her sensibilities and right to express disdain for groups with which she disagrees.

Ms. Riddick posted on Twitter, a social media platform that is open for all to see, so she certainly could not and should not have what lawyers refer to as an “expectation of privacy,” since SSI did not quote her from statements she made in a private conversation or email exchange, for instance, where she had not agreed to have her opinions publicized.

And, more to the point, her counter-factual assertion that Israel is an example of settler colonialism is precisely the type of slander against the Jewish state that groups like SSI have as their mission to answer back to—and particularly when that type of characterization of Israel is both historically and factually inaccurate and slanderous. The campus enemies of Israel have regularly tried to suppress pro-Israel views from being heard or even debated in an honest dialogue with those with pro-Palestinian viewpoints, and the DSG’s decision to drop recognition of SSI at Duke achieved that very situation, making it impossible for SSI to correct falsehoods that are the animating content of the anti-Israel campaign at Duke and elsewhere.

In justifying her decision to yank recognition from SSI, DSG president Wang unconvincingly suggested that SSI’s posts directed at Riddick were “evidence that the group singled out an individual student on their organization’s social media account in a way that was unacceptable for any student group and appeared antithetical to the group’s stated mission to be welcoming and inclusive to all Duke students, and educational in mission and purpose.” [Emphasis added.] And even though the DSG has not refused to recognize a student group in five years, Wang wrote that “any group exhibiting similar conduct would be handled in the same manner” and any group exhibiting “potentially hostile or harmful” behavior is subject to having their status re-examined or being suspended at any time.

One group at Duke, as a matter of fact, seems to have escaped the watchful eye of the student government censors, a “group exhibiting similar conduct” that has regularly displayed “potentially hostile or harmful” behavior, namely, Duke’s own chapter of the virulent activist group, Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP). SJP, on over 200 campuses where it has chapters, purports to be a group seeking social justice for the long-aggrieved Palestinians, but on today’s contentious campuses, being pro-Palestinian, by definition, has come to mean being anti-Israel. Thus, the rhetoric and behavior of SJP are almost exclusively comprised of denunciations of the Jewish state, along with the standard, though false, language of social justice which includes such slurs against the Jewish state as settler colonialism, occupation, racism, apartheid, and genocide.

SSI was established at Duke, as it has been on other campuses, for the exact reason to answer back to this type of rhetoric and ideology hurled relentlessly toward Israel, and to counter those accusations with facts, history, context, and rigorous debate—exactly what universities hope will take place within their respective communities.

In expressing its dismay that the Duke chapter had been decertified, SSI’s national office confirmed the mission of the group, stating that “SSI’s mission is to be a clear and confident pro-Israel voice on campuses, and to support students with grassroots activism” so that “Zionist voices would be heard, and that Israel education programming will be available to students on Duke’s campus.” Absent a dissenting, pro-Israel voice, the debate about the Israeli/Palestinian conflict will be one-sided and counter-factual, precisely as the enemies of Israel wish it to be.

So if the speech and behavior of Duke’s SJP were evaluated in the same way that SSI’s single social media post was in response to a critic’s slander about Israel, that organization might deservedly lose its recognition, too, assuming things were assessed fairly. On its Instagram account, for example, Duke’s SJP regularly denounces Israel, Zionism, and supporters of Israel as unrepentant racists and brutal murderers of innocent Arab Palestinians. “The reality is that zionism [sic] has been an exclusionary, racist ideology from the beginning,” one SJP Instagram post proclaimed.

During the latest conflict in Gaza, initiated only after Hamas had launched some 4300 rockets into southern Israeli towns with the sole purpose of murdering Jewish civilians (and each rocket launch constituting a war crime, incidentally), SJP conveniently ignore any of the aggression by Hamas and instead castigated Israel when it finally moved to protect its citizenry from lethal attacks from the terrorist organization ruling Gaza. “Please remember that the brutalization of the people of Gaza and of Palestinians” another Instagram post claimed, “ . . . is by deliberate design that Palestinians continue to be subjugated and dehumanized.” As a result, the group sententiously announced, “We have no choice but to oppose Israel and zionism [sic] completely.”

And in another ludicrous Instagram post, SJP asserted that “For decades Israeli soldiers and air strikes have target[ed] medics, media, and civilians,” ignoring the fact that the IDF is the most scrupulous and careful military in the world that regularly attempts to limit Arab civilian casualties during its defensive incursions, this despite Hamas’s inhuman practice of embedding itself and its weaponry in civilian neighborhoods, apartment buildings, schools, and mosques, thereby almost assuring that there will be collateral damage and civilian deaths despite the care with which the IDF conducts itself. Those facts apparently went unrecognized by SJP who, in another Instagram post, published a list of the names of Palestinian children “massacred” in the latest conflict with Hamas, children they described as “34 Palestinian children murdered by Israel on its war on Gaza.” The facts that many of the so-called children killed were actually armed teenage militants or that many of the fatalities suffered in Gaza were the result of Hamas rockets landing inside Gaza itself and killing Arab civilians—including children—of course, were ignored by the clever SJP authors of this and other Instagram posts libeling Israel.

And SJP was nearly giddy when it learned that SSI had been canceled, knowing that bothersome, opposing views about Israel and the Palestinians would still be absent on the Duke campus. A lengthy, tendentious November 13th letter SJP published in Duke’s student newspaper, The Chronicle, “It's okay to support Palestine,” used the announcement that SSI had been eliminated to deride the group for its clumsy social media skills and to, once again, attack the Jewish state with a series of lies, distortions, historically inaccurate claims, and lack of context. The column also contained an overall caustic tone in which they taunted SSI by repeating the phrase at the center of the Twitter controversy, “settler colonialism,” no less than thirteen times in the article, as well as making no less than seven references to Israeli “settlers” to reinforce the accusation.

With an astounding lack of self-awareness, SJP petitioned the Duke administration to curtail the targeting of any group of students and shield them from the “violence” of speech and ideas that could “harm” them, as the poor Ms. Riddick claimed to be harmed after she was called out for her baseless critique of Israel.

“To the Duke Administration,” SJP wrote, “we call on you to speak up on behalf of the students you are obligated to create a safe environment for,” ignoring, of course, the fact that for years SJP has been singularly responsible for creating a hostile climate for Jewish students on campuses where they are active. Further, SJP claimed, “This instance of targeted harassment [toward Ms. Riddick] is not an isolated one. It is not wholly unique or novel. Rather, it is the product of Zionist organizing’s fundamental nature.” In other words, according to SJP—a group that has publicly announced it seeks to expel Zionists from campuses and shut down any pro-Israel dialogue (and is proud of its role in doing so)—being pro-Israel means having to target others with opposing views. When SJP attacks its opponents and targets them, of course, it is acceptable activism in a campaign for social justice. When SSI does this on behalf of Israel, however, it is harassment and morally questionable.

The woke language of this screed is both cruel, meaningless, and accusatory, asserting, for example, that groups like SSI have no moral standing in the first place, that “Israeli advocacy fundamentally relies upon the settler-colonial strategies of conceptual distortion and pathological displacement to reaffirm the settler-colonial principles upon which Israel was founded.”

The SJP letter also includes unsupportable claims that appear promiscuously in anti-Israel rhetoric but are a misreading of history and facts on the ground. So, for example, the letter decries “the historic and ongoing displacement of Palestinian peoples and the appropriation and occupation of Palestinian lands,” ignoring the fact that the disputed territories of Judea and Samaria (carelessly referred to as the West Bank) have never been Palestinian land, and, like Israel proper, was land that comprised the Mandate for Palestine and committed all of those areas to a Jewish homeland. Of what country is Israel a colony, anyway? No other country.

If Jews are so-called “settlers” in the Holy Land, then Arab Palestinians are settlers, too. Not surprisingly, however, SJP and their fellow travelers in the hate-Israel world only use that slur to describe Jews who live anywhere in a region where they have had an uninterrupted presence for more than 3000 years.

In its statement concerning the Duke situation, SSI National expressed its concern that the decision to shut down the Duke chapter because of a single social media post in which the group defended Israel against an untruth published by a critic, represents a threat to academic free speech and the right of individuals on both sides of the Israeli/Palestinian debate to be heard. “We would like to know if other clubs on Duke’s campus have their social media channels reviewed by the student government as well?” the organization rightly asked. “Do other clubs need to apologize for writing statements that some may disagree with?”

“If not, then this is a clear singling out of the new pro-Israel club,” they concluded, “and we are concerned about whether Duke students truly have the right to free speech.”

Apparently, in the case of those who wish to defend the Jewish state, the answer is, sadly, no.

Share

Wondering what happened to your Disqus comments?

Read the Story