Islamic terrorism isn't going away any time soon, but it tends to be more pervasive in Europe.


	And this shooting <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-61933817">will obviously</a><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/24/europe/norway-oslo-gay-bar-shooting-intl-hnk/index.html"> bring back</a> memories of the Pulse nightclub massacre in Orlando by an Islamic terrorist.

<blockquote>
	
		Two people died and 21 were wounded early on Saturday in what police called an "act of Islamist terrorism".

	
		The shootings were in and near the London Pub, a popular LGBTQ+ venue, the Herr Nilsen jazz club and another pub.

	
		Norway's prime minister told the BBC the suspect was questioned in May, but was not deemed a threat at the time.
</blockquote>


	So business as usual.

<blockquote>
	
		The suspect, charged with terrorism, is a Norwegian citizen originally from Iran, and was “known to the police,” but has only received “minor convictions” up until now, prosecutor Christian Hatlo told reporters in Oslo Saturday.
</blockquote>


	"Iran" as an origin point sticks out. Shiite terrorism is usually organized under Iran's umbrella and does not involve lone wolf attackers. The country has a Sunni population.&nbsp;


	ISIS has also dissuaded its supporters from hitting gay bars after&nbsp;the Pulse massacre which was misunderstood as an anti-gay attack. ISIS wants the motives to be clear. And the Pulse massacre keeps being misrepresented as an anti-gay attack. That hasn't stopped one or two terror plots from targeting gay targets.


	Alternatively, like the Pulse massacre, it might all just be an unintentional coincidence.

Islamic Terror Attack Hits Norwegian Gay Bar

Islamic terrorism isn't going away any time soon, but it tends to be more pervasive in Europe.


	And this shooting will obviously bring back memories of

Islamic Terror Attack Hits Norwegian Gay Bar

Want to hijack every landlord's property? Declare a public health emergency. Supreme Court abortion decision didn't go your way? Declare a public health emergency.


	At least that Senator Elizabeth Warren's <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/sens-warren-smith-urge-biden-declare-public-health-emergency-abortion-rcna35338">bright idea</a>.


	"On Friday, with the release of the Dobbs decision, we entered a perilous time that threatens millions of women across this nation. We urge the president to declare a public health emergency to protect abortion access for all Americans, unlocking critical resources and authority that states and the federal government can use to meet the surge in demand for reproductive health services. The danger is real, and Democrats must meet it with the urgency it deserves," a New York Times&nbsp;op-ed co-written by Warren and Senator Tina Smith proposes.


	Not being able to murder as many babies locally is not a public health emergency. Just the opposite.


	But give Liz credit for coming up with an exciting new way to abuse "public health emergency" at a time when the term, the concept, and its implementing agencies are already desperately short of credibility.


	Warren also doesn't provide much in the way of details on this "public health emergency", but spends the bulk of the op-ed demanding the elimination of the filibuster the Electoral College, free elections, and dispatching dissidents to gulags.

"Public Health Emergencies" Are the Government's Unlimited Power 'Cheat Code'

Want to hijack every landlord's property? Declare a public health emergency. Supreme Court abortion decision didn't go your way? Declare a public health

"Public Health Emergencies" Are the Government's Unlimited Power 'Cheat Code'

Qatar has bought up much of Washington D.C. That's why the "Iran Deal" keeps moving forward, we nearly fought two wars for the Muslim Brotherhood, and Jamal Khashoggi is the only thing half the city cares about when it comes to the region.


	Sometimes the Qataris go <a href="https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/2022/06/hillary-clinton-adviser-charge-afghan-war-accused-daniel-greenfield/">a little overboard</a>.

<blockquote>
	
		Federal prosecutors have obtained records indicating that John R. Allen, the retired four-star Marine general who commanded all American troops in Afghanistan and now heads a venerable Washington think tank, secretly lobbied for the government of Qatar, lied to investigators about his role and tried to withhold evidence sought by a federal subpoena, according to court documents.
</blockquote>


	That seems <a href="https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/9067015/prince-charles-suitcase-cash-qatari-politician/">downright discreet</a> compared to Prince Charles.

<blockquote>
	
		PRINCE Charles personally accepted €1million in cash stuffed in a suitcase from a controversial Qatari politician, reports say.

	
		The extraordinary payment was one of three totalling €3million the Prince of Wales is said to have received from Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani between 2011 and 2015.

	
		The sheikh, the former Prime Minister of Qatar nicknamed HBJ, handed over huge sums of cash in private meetings with Charles,&nbsp;The Sunday Times reports.

	
		At one meeting he reportedly presented €1million - around £861,000 - stuffed into carrier bags from posh grocer Fortnum &amp; Mason.

	
		At another one-to-one meeting at Clarence House in 2015, Charles accepted a holdall containing another €1million.

	
		Two advisers in the royal household hand-counted the cash, said to have been made up of now-discontinued €500 notes.

	
		Private bank Coutts is then understood to have collected the suitcase from Charles’ London residence at the request of palace aides.
</blockquote>


	Why hand over suitcases full of cash?&nbsp;


	The Qataris spend a whole lot of time and money doing business in the UK. The&nbsp;Qatari Investment Authority recently signed a memorandum to invest $10 billion into the UK. While the Qataris might be medieval barbarians, their presentation is generally pretty slick. This isn't the 70s with sheikhs showing up with suitcases of cash to buy things. There's no reason that Charlie couldn't have gotten a check. It would have been easier and more convenient for everyone.


	But the virtue of cash is that it's much harder to trace and dropping off a bunch of cash would provide Charlie with the temptation to pocket some of it. It's a good way to offer bribes to catch a mark doing something blackmailable.&nbsp;


	Does Charles need<a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/arielshapiro/2021/03/10/inside-the-firm-how-the-royal-familys-28-billion-money-machine-really-works/"> that money</a>?

<blockquote>
	
		As with the Crown Estate, Prince Charles cannot sell the assets belonging to the Duchy, but he can earn money from them. By renting out property to retailers, farmers and residents, the Duchy brought in more than $50 million in revenue last year, $30 million of which went to the Prince of Wales and his descendants to support their respective staffs and operations. Even without the crown, the Duchy of Cornwall is far more lucrative for Charles than the Sovereign Grant, which paid him less than&nbsp;$2.5 million&nbsp;last year. Of that, $7.3 million funded the Prince’s 132 personal staffers, $6.75 million went to taxes and $4.4 million was dedicated to charitable activities, including the Prince’s Trust, Charles’ charity to help unemployed youth.&nbsp;&nbsp;
</blockquote>


	It doesn't sound like he's doing that badly. But perhaps impressions are misleading or the Qataris were hoping he would help himself anyway.


	Qatar doesn't enjoy the kind of hold on the UK that it does on America. And the Islamic terror state would like to deepen that hold.

The Qataris Are Just Handing Suitcases of Cash to Western Leaders

Qatar has bought up much of Washington D.C. That's why the "Iran Deal" keeps moving forward, we nearly fought two wars for the Muslim Brotherhood, and Jamal

The Qataris Are Just Handing Suitcases of Cash to Western Leaders

There's almost no point in listing the various international criminals, scumbags, and enemy oligarchs Hunter Biden rubbed&nbsp;shoulders with. It might almost be easier to list the ones he <a href="https://nypost.com/2022/06/25/hunter-biden-met-with-russian-oligarch-now-wanted-for-murder/">did not consort with</a>.

<blockquote>
	
		When his father was the second most powerful man in the world, Hunter Biden met in Russia with at least four oligarchs closely aligned with Vladimir Putin — including one who is now wanted for murder in the country, The Post has learned.

	
		The meeting with Telman Ismailov took place on Feb. 17, 2012 at the Moscow headquarters of AST Group, his vast holding company which once owned a publishing house, a tour company, and had a telecom division, according to the Moscow Times.

	
		Ismailov was accused in 2017 by Russian authorities of paying $2 million for the murder of two entrepreneurs a year earlier, Agence France-Presse reported. Vladimir Savkin, a shopping mall magnate and Yury Brilev, founder of Lyublino Motors, were both bumped off on the Novorizhskoye highway in Moscow, allegedly over a business dispute with Ismailov, according to the Investigative Committee of Russia, the country’s primary federal investigations agency...

	
		It’s unclear what Hunter Biden wanted with Ismailov, but the trip was part of a two-day meet and greet between Hunter and wealthy oligarchs in the country — which at least in part focused on seeking foreign cash for Rosemont Realty, an offshoot of Hunter Biden’s Rosemont Seneca Partners. The investment company was co-founded by Hunter Biden, Devon Archer and Chris Heinz.
</blockquote>


	Chris Heinz is John Kerry's stepson.


	Rosemont Seneca had the infamous Chinese $1 billion deal and there were attempts to solicit Russian cash. A small sample<a href="https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/HSGAC%20-%20Finance%20Joint%20Report%202020.09.23.pdf"> included</a>...

<blockquote>
	
		On April 15, 2014, Burisma Holdings (Burisma), a Ukrainian private oil and gas company owned by corrupt Ukrainian oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky, sent two wires totaling $112,758.15 to Rosemont Seneca Bohai LLC

	
		Between May 15, 2014 and Feb. 12, 2016, Burisma sent another 48 wires to Rosemont Seneca Bohai, totaling $3,489,490.78.

	
		Hunter Biden and his associate, Archer, had a financial relationship with Russian businesswoman Elena Baturina.&nbsp; Baturina is the former wife of the late Yuri Luzhkov, who was the mayor of Moscow...&nbsp;On Feb. 14, 2014, Baturina wired $3.5 million to a Rosemont Seneca Thornton LLC

	
		&nbsp;On April 22, 2014, Vice President Joe Biden appeared with Ukrainian Prime Minister Arsemy Yasenyuk and addressed Ukrainian legislators in Kyiv regarding Russia’s actions in Crimea.&nbsp; The same day, Novatus Holding PTE. LTD. (Novatus Holding), a private holding company in Singapore, used a Latvian bank to wire $142,300 to Archer’s company, Rosemont Seneca Bohai.&nbsp; The currency transaction report states, “For Rosemont Seneca Bohai LLC, … For a Car.”&nbsp; &nbsp; According to a Securities and Exchange Commission report, Kenges Rakishev of Kazakhstan is the sole shareholder of Novatus Holding and has a business address associated with a company in Kazakhstan called SAT &amp; Company.315&nbsp; Rakishev is the son-in-law of now retired Kazakhstan politician, Imangali Tasmagambetov.
</blockquote>


	And there seems to be a bottomless supply of these folks and of our politicians eager to court them.

Is There An International Scumbag Hunter Biden Didn't Hit Up?

There's almost no point in listing the various international criminals, scumbags, and enemy oligarchs Hunter Biden rubbed&nbsp;shoulders with. It might almost

Is There An International Scumbag Hunter Biden Didn't Hit Up?

Serious liberal&nbsp;legal scholars have been willing to admit that Roe v. Wade was indefensible on legal and constitutional grounds. The only reason that it, like a number of past and present Supreme Court decisions existed, was to safeguard a cultural lifestyle of a politically influential minority.


	Justice Alito's strong medicine draft dismantling the constitutional legitimacy Roe v. Wade was already widely distributed. "The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision, including the one on which the defenders of Roe and Casey now chiefly rely—the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment," he blasts.


	He's right, of course.


	And despite the harassment, threats, and intimidation, and even an assassination plot, Justice Roberts joined the conservative majority to abort Roe v. Wade.


	&nbsp;"The nine Members of this Court will no longer decide the basic legality of pre-viability abortion for all 330 million Americans. That issue will be resolved by the people and their representatives in the democratic process in the States or Congress," Justice Kavanaugh notes in his concurrence.


	The Democrats keep talking about "democracy" (it's in their name after all) and castigating any opposition to them as a "threat to democracy" or even more militantly, an "attack on democracy", and yet they violently resist the idea that the abortion question should be decided by the voters.


	The Supreme Court didn't take away abortion from anyone. It didn't mandate anything on abortion. It correctly ruled that was an ideological invention and that there's no special basis for federal protections for abortion.


	If, as lefties insist, abortion is enormously popular, they should be able to ride to victory in the midterms on a populist tide, increase their hold on the Senate and House, and easily win the White House again in 2024 while holding sufficient numbers to rig the Supreme Court, add abortion to the Constitution, and anything else they like.


	Except that the polls show no such tide and the midterms are the Republicans to lose (and in Pennsylvania, Ohio and Georgia, they're trying very hard to lose the Senate all over again thanks to political consultants and celebrity candidates that make RINOs look conservative). Despite the Days of Rage and pink hat brigade hysteria, Americans are not on board with abortion until birth or especially enthusiastic about abortion. Despite making a great deal of inroads on social issues, so that Republicans have largely abandoned them for generic culture wars, abortion does abide because there is very clearly a life being snuffed out.


	The Democrats need a federal mandate for abortion precisely because they know how unpopular it is. They're the ones who have been waging a war on democracy over it. And that's why they're hysterical over losing the ability to use central judicial control to force abortion on states and communities.


	Who hates democracy more than Planned Parenthood?

Supreme Court Turns Over Abortion Question to the People. Democrats Rage Against Democracy.

Serious liberal&nbsp;legal scholars have been willing to admit that Roe v. Wade was indefensible on legal and constitutional grounds. The only reason that it,

Supreme Court Turns Over Abortion Question to the People. Democrats Rage Against Democracy.

[Show your support for Mike Lindell and The Glazov Gang by using this <a href="https://www.mypillow.com/gg21">link</a> for <a href="https://www.mypillow.com/gg21">MyPillow</a> and <a href="https://www.mypillow.com/gg21">save up to 65%</a> on all your purchases!] 
	 
	Follow us on our <a href="https://rumble.com/c/c-733663">Rumble Channel</a> and on <a href="https://jamieglazov.com/">JamieGlazov.com</a><a href="https://twitter.com/JamieGlazov" rel="noopener">,</a> GETTR: <a href="https://gettr.com/user/jglazov">@jglazov</a>, Parler: <a href="https://parler.com/user/Jamieglazov11">@Jamieglazov11</a>, Gab: <a href="https://gab.com/jglazov">@jglazov</a> and <a href="https://www.facebook.com/jamie.glazov.7/">Facebook</a>. 
	 
	Please donate via our <a href="https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_donations&amp;business=RWPXQUKHG5JZL&amp;lc=US&amp;item_name=The%20Glazov%20Gang&amp;currency_code=USD&amp;bn=PP%2dDonationsBF%3abtn_donateCC_LG%2egif%3aNonHosted">Pay Pal account.</a> 


	This new Glazov Gang episode features <a href="https://twitter.com/DineshDSouza">Dinesh D’Souza</a>, creator of his new film,<a href="https://2000mules.com/"> 2000 Mules</a>. 
	 
	Dinesh discusses What I Love About Steve Bannon, shedding light on A man who can't be controlled. 
	 
	Don't miss it!

<div class="media_embed" height="360px" width="640px">
	<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="rumble" src="https://rumble.com/embed/v16plae/?pub=jfunl" width="640px" height="360px" frameborder="0"></iframe></div>


	And make sure to watch Dinesh discuss his new film, <a href="https://2000mules.com/">2000 Mules</a>, where he unveils the ballot laundering cartel.

<div class="media_embed" height="360px" width="640px">
	<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="rumble" src="https://rumble.com/embed/v1696pn/?pub=jfunl" width="640px" height="360px" frameborder="0"></iframe></div>


	Subscribe to <a href="https://jamieglazov.com/">JamieGlazov.com.</a>

Glazov Gang: Dinesh D'Souza - 'What I Love About Steve Bannon'

[Show your support for Mike Lindell and The Glazov Gang by using this link for MyPillow and save up to 65% on all your purchases!]
	
	Follow us on our Rumble

Frontpage Mag

Glazov Gang: Dinesh D'Souza - 'What I Love About Steve Bannon'

Wondering what happened to your Disqus comments?

FPM Series

Disloyal Military

Progressive Fascists

Racist Mayors

The Point

Islamic Terror Attack Hits Norwegian Gay Bar

"Public Health Emergencies" Are the Government's Unlimited Power 'Cheat Code'

The Qataris Are Just Handing Suitcases of Cash to Western Leaders

Is There An International Scumbag Hunter Biden Didn't Hit Up?

Supreme Court Turns Over Abortion Question to the People. Democrats Rage Against Democracy.

Events