|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
India had suffered repeated horrifying Islamic terrorist attacks sponsored by Pakistan before it struck back. Despite what you see in the media and hear from politicians, India’s strikes on Pakistan were light and understated. But you wouldn’t know that from the replay of the usual way the media covers India and Israel.
India struck terror targets. Unfortunately, in Pakistan, from Osama bin Laden on down, Islamic terrorists have have ties to the Pakistani Islamic terrorist regime. And Islamic terrorists have long since learned to play the victimhood game.
Despite what you might see on social media, this isn’t WWIII. (Ukraine and Russia also wasn’t WWIII. So beware of people predicting WWIII at the drop of a hat.) But India is sending an important and overdue message. And our elected officials should be standing with India, rather than playing the both sides are bad game, and \no amount of betrayals ever seems to convince U.S. government officials to stop cozying up to Islamic terrorists.
Excellent analysis.
Truly. “This is not WWIII” is groundbreaking. “Islamic terrorists are bad” is an unheard of conclusion.
No need to discuss the fact that India and Pakistan both have nuclear weapons. No need to consider the wider repercussions of a war between Pakistan and India. No need for cogency or considerations about the future. Just tell the people who actually risk something that they should risk more while Daniel sits comfortably in front of his monitor.
Excellent analysis, Daniel!
If only India would combat Islamophobia like England, import another 10 million Muslims, then have their Hindu population undergo humiliation rituals like our TSA does to us I’m sure Islamic terrorism would become a thing of the past.
And to think Pakistan was once Indian soil.
Muslims came in, began rioting/killing 1000s of Indians, Gandhi gave the sage advice of never retaliating, muslims finally imported enough numbers, and VIOLA . . . they ripped off a huge chunk of India.
(Gandhi was assassinated by fellow Indian to end his “lay down & die” policy, but by then the damage was done.)
Muslims are seeding their first attempt here in Texas in an official “muslins only” capacity.
Minneapolis, Minnesota imported low-life Somalis and turned it into “Little Mogadishu” – a crime riden cesspool that had to have a wall built to limit the damage. (Ami Horowitz interviewed 28 Somali youth males, ALL expressed an absolute willingness to jihad against America if needed.)
After Ahmed Muhamed “Clock Boy” pulled a dry-run stunt by parading a fake bomb through school, the little shit was welcomed to Obama’s White House.
If bullshit like that continues unchecked here, we’ll get a repeat of India. Not a new country torn off, but “no-go zones” growing like a cancer.
The proposition nation maintains peace by mandating toleration of all peoples, cultures and ideologies as equally valid expressions. But nations are not propositional and peace cannot be maintained with unlimited toleration. We must abandon the liberal, progressive, libertarian ideas that everyone can just get along with passive toleration of that which is inimical to us..
Western toleration telegraphs weakness and invites our enemies to conquer and destroy us. Muslims know “peace” comes only after Dar al-harb has killed, assimilated or miscegenated every last one of us into oblivion.
Here is a map of mosques in Austin, Houston and Dallas alone:
https://x.com/SherriTexas/status/1915961745010467025
If anything, India didn’t hit back hard enough. A sledge hammer upside the head is far more painful than a mere slap in the face.
India should’ve done to Pakistan what Trump did to the Houthis: bomb the sh*t out of them until they beg for the bombing to stop. It’s the only effective way to deal with terrorists and terrorism.
During WW II one of the things we did was to cut off their supplies like attacking Trains carrying the Supplies the reason India is attacking Pakistan is the simple fact and cutting off the Training of Terrorists at the source
If that’s the case then India should make every effort to obliterate the infrastructure that facilitates the movement of supplies to Pakistan.
India should also keep an eye on the Iranians who are more than likely behind the terrorists and be prepared to take some sort of limited action against Iran.
With other countries chomping at the bit to “deal” with Iran, the last thing the Iranians need is India breathing down their necks.. India knows this and it’s probably why they took this action against Pakistan.
The only thing Islamists understand is the power of strength. India was right in the defense of the Kashmiris and now Pakistan understands there is and will be a critical price to pay in engaging in this kind of evil.
When did so many world leaders become wusses?
The media is the worst purveyor of Islamists as victims; it is truly revolting as innocent people are murdered and when defended the media cries the same “chicken little the sky is falling” over and over again. Totally infuriating!
Good for India!!!
…not a mere “right to strike back”, but a DUTY to strike back!
A country, to be legitimate, must protect its citizens. An act of terrorism REQUIRES counter moves that cow and shrivel the terrorists and their sponsors, lest there be further acts.