The $1.7 trillion omnibus spending bill does maintain the federal government’s ongoing commitment to human genocide.
“One provision in the bill states that “not less than” $575 million “should be made available for family planning/reproductive health, including in areas where population growth threatens biodiversity or endangered species.”
The implications of this are pretty horrific as I discussed in this article from 2014.
The idea that the way to protect insects, fish and animals is by preventing human beings from having children is part of an approach known as Population, Health and Environment (PHE) which integrates population control into environmentalist initiatives.
PHE dates back to the 1980s and is practiced by mainstream organizations such as the World Wildlife Fund. The Smithsonian’s Woodrow Wilson Center, which is funded partly by the US government, aggressively champions PHE eugenics and USAID funds PHE programs and distributes PHE training manuals derived in part from Wilson Center materials.
Population Action International and the Sierra Club sponsored a congressional briefing on PHE post-2015. Population Action International was originally founded as the Population Crisis Committee in the sixties.
…the budget explicitly states that its goal is to reduce human population growth for the sake of the animals.
PHE initiatives keep popping up in massive federal spending bills without anyone paying much attention to them. Or willing to debate and condemn this effort to chain together a reduction in human population to the need to protect the sand flea or the kangaroo rat.
PHE is also incredibly racist because it often targets third-world countries.
Unfortunately, Republicans keep voting for massive spending bills like this $1.7 trillion monster that finance PHE.
The quick summary of PHE is, ‘Save the whales, kill your kids.’
Una Salus says
This is great because the less people have kids the more human stock units can be imported from the developing world and they will not know any better and be happy.
Algorithmic Analyst says
Thanks Una, very clever 🙂
Una Salus says
Have a merry Christmas AA
Noah Andeark says
I think a good compromise on abortion would be to mandate abortion for Democrats. Not babies…..they’re not Democrats. Here’s how it would work……beginning in the 54th trimester, should the fetus sign a Democrat party registration card, indicating that no viable cogent life exists, it should be aborted ASAP. I don’t see any downside.
Algorithmic Analyst says
Great article Daniel! Impressive that you realized that in 2014 already. I think only in the last few years it became clear to me.
The resolution I found is that human’s role is to worship the spiritual, something the animals can’t do. And obviously the left is anti-spiritual.
THX 1138 says
Please define your idea of worshipping the “spiritual”. The Aztecs and the Incas worshipped their idea of the “spiritual”, they SACRIFICED (altruism) to the spiritual, they sacrificed thousands upon thousands of human lives to their idea of the “spiritual”.
The Environmentalists are now practicing their brand of “spiritual” sacrifice (altruism) of human lives to the mosquito. The banning of DDT did just that.
Or you can worship the spirit of Allah and practice the altruistic sacrifice of human lives to Allah. Or you can worship the spirit of a disembodied, super-organism, that the socialist calls Almighty Society, and sacrifice millions upon millions of human lives to that disembodied mystical spirit.
The Nazis practiced ritual sacrifice (altruism) of human lives to the spirit of the Aryan Race.
What is the common denominator to all these cults of sacrifice? ALTRUISM. The moral code that claims that man is not an end in himself but a means to the ends of others. So long as men believe that altruism is the highest good, the sacrifice of the individual to others will be the result.
THX 1138 says
Now compare those IRRATIONAL ideas of the “spiritual” to a RATIONAL idea of the spiritual:
“Happiness is the successful state of life, pain is an agent of death. Happiness is that state of consciousness which proceeds from the achievement of one’s values. A morality that dares to tell you to find happiness in the renunciation of your happiness—to value the failure of your values—is an insolent negation of morality. A doctrine that gives you, as an ideal, the role of a sacrificial animal seeking slaughter on the altars of others, is giving you death as your standard. By the grace of reality and the nature of life, man—every man—is an end in himself, he exists for his own sake, and the achievement of his own happiness is his highest moral purpose.
But neither life nor happiness can be achieved by the pursuit of irrational whims. Just as man is free to attempt to survive in any random manner, but will perish unless he lives as his nature requires, so he is free to seek his happiness in any mindless fraud, but the torture of frustration is all he will find, unless he seeks the happiness proper to man. The purpose of morality is to teach you, not to suffer and die, but to enjoy yourself and live.” – John Galt
Una Salus says
Happy, happy, happy.
112 says
That’s how you make a spoiled brat. Pain is part of the growing process in all creatures.
Algorithmic Analyst says
Your Buddhism is close enough. Everyone has a different way. For some it can be a purely intellectual approach.
THX 1138 says
I’m not a Buddhist. But Buddhism does have some good ideas within it. So does Judaism and Christianity. So does Islam for that matter.
The lethal problem is the good ideas are contained within the wider context of mysticism, magical thinking, superstition, faith, and the irrational.
Algorithmic Analyst says
Always have to use your powers of intellectual discrimination to distinguish between good ideas and bad ideas.
THX 1138 says
To Algorythmic Analyst,
“Always have to use your powers of intellectual discrimination to distinguish between good ideas and bad ideas.”
That is not possible when religion is in its pure form, when reason is the mere handmaiden of faith. And it is not possible if you seriously believe that reason is limited and there is knowledge beyond reason and superior to reason, when you seriously believe that faith is superior to reason.
That is what produced the Christian Dark Ages. It was not that Christians would not reason at all that produced the Dark Ages. It was that they would not reason beyond a certain point, beyond the point of faith-based claims being demolished by the conclusions of reason. If reason contradicted faith, reason was rejected, persecuted, and silenced.
Daniel Greenfield says
there’s always an ugly new twist, unfortunately
112 says
What I was thinking. They were “spiritual” as long as it took to infiltrate religion.
Onzeur Trante says
To put it simply, if that is possible, we are witnessing a spreading psychosis (originating in the Left) that operates like the plague.
It is difficult to rationalize or explain away the Left’s psychotic hatred for humanity, and a cure for it has yet to be found. Because it is like a plague, many will be afflicted and succumb to the psychosis, those (a minority) who have a deeper understanding and love of humanity and God will survive and look on helplessly as civilization dies.
Kynarion Hellenis says
It is difficult to rationalize or explain away because it is based in deception, not reason.
The globalists need trusting tools who have faith in the false, utopian vision. When the objective is achieved, the trusting tools will be expendable slaves. Their last moment will be the one in which their cost exceeds their utility.
There will be no nonsense about equality or universal human dignity or rights.
Ed Cane says
Liberalism is a mental illness.
FatherGuido says
I am starting to think these eco nuts maybe on to something with the doing away of fossil fuels and their so called “reproductive health care”. Maybe we should have a redo and go back to a time of hunters and gatherers, maybe a bit of agrarian society. If people are busy working the land, hunting game, and gathering nuts and berries they wont have time to worry about theirs nor anyone else’s feelings. “i do not care that bill called you a racial slur, i got to get the north 40 planted. i aint got time to protest.”
Daniel Greenfield says
good to see you back
FatherGuido says
I may not comment as much anymore but rest assured you are the first author i read everyday. I do truly enjoy reading your articles.
i do have to admit though you saying that to me is kind of like when my favorite guitar player came up to me and asked how i was.
Hope Hanukah is going well for you and have a great new year.
Daniel Greenfield says
That’s great to know. And it’s more like Father Guido saying hi to me while reporting live from Central Park.
Algorithmic Analyst says
Thanks, FatherGuido. I always enjoy your comments 🙂
112 says
There isn’t any going back with the technologies available today.
It is also the other way around. When people feel like they have the best they are proud to work hard. When tech is archaic trash designed to addict you and cause your destruction, you slow down.
I think Americans would be much happier if I brought back automobile manufacturing and other industries, my gut says the stone age won’t suit you.
Cat says
but arent babies the endangered species?
Algorithmic Analyst says
That’s a good point. In most species that come to my mind babies are the most endangered. Even in humans in the early 1900s before WW1.
Steven Kardas says
Dr. Jordan Peterson on the subject:
“The problem I have fundamentally is that I find it very difficult to distinguish valid environmental claims from environmental claims that are made as a secondary anti-capitalist front essentially., In the environmentalist movement there is a powerful stream of anti-human sentiment and it is masquerading under the guise of virtue on a planetary scale. When you are saving the planet , then everything is on the table to accomplished it, because….well we are saving the PLANET !.
An example would be intentionally making energy more expensive which of course obviously makes things more difficult for poor people in the end. It is definitely is a big issue. It’s a conundrum for environmentalist’s (leftists). It’s like what’s it going to be ? Clean air or hungry people? The response is “Well we don’t have to choose, because the path is clear.” .
Billy Corr says
A commentator on another discussion site – probably American Renaissance – said that s/he had been
strongly opposed to legal abortion until s/he realized who was getting most of the abortions in the USA.
If Haiti, Ethiopia, Somalia and Bangladesh, for example, had half or a quarter of their present populations, they
wouldn’t be in such a miserable condition and predictably whining for urgent food aid every few years.
I just gave away a book entitled “Lords of Poverty” about the great international aid industry, a multi-billion-dollar
racket, and Somalia and Ethiopia – of course – featured prominently.
I ought to add that the book was published over THIRTY years ago; in the intervening three decades the
populations of both Somalia and Ethiopia have literally doubled.
One understands what Daniel is saying, of course, but the ghastly reality is that a good number of countries have
populations which are LITERALLY DOUBLING every few years.
Attenborough drew attention to this grim fact but was promptly silenced.
A truly brutal cynic would suggest that the countries with the highest birthrates ought to take up cannibalism,
but the usual goodthinkful people in power simply wouldn’t hear of such a thing.
with
Billy Corr says
Here you are [and WHAT do these nations have in common?]:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/264687/countries-with-the-highest-population-growth-rate/
Now get out your calculators and figure out how long it will take the population of South Sudan to double.
Daniel Greenfield says
the issue isn’t population growth rate, it’s the inability of failed states and societies to support any population because of their dysfunction
Lightbringer says
Many of their governments are socialist or quasi-socialist. Such governments usually end in misery.
Billy Corr says
Here is Attenborough, whom I revere as a sage and visionary:
Billy Corr says
112 says
There are lots of them who think this in semi-high positions. I can turn buildings into urban forests and the higher you build the more animals. That is not interesting to them. The opposing faction wants most people to leave earth so they just have a few for slaves, but the extermination faction is winning because they say humans are parasites. In fact, they control most media messaging now.
That being said the solutions to beat them also they know, and the bet is that no one will believe it and let themselves be enslaved and wiped out, “because they know they should be”. At the end of the day they’re evil but right enough, and watching the first few million die and still, outside of some rare people who understand the implications here, I’m not convincing anyone.
At any rate if you think the guys behind these ideas are less disgusting, you’re incorrect. Really annoying to serve them.