|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
[Order David Horowitz’s new book, America Betrayed, HERE.]
During the last few years, while the American left and its media minions have been presenting clueless consumers with a narrative that’s well-nigh unprecedented in the degree to which it deviates from the truth, David Horowitz, in a series of model books, has been busy setting the record straight. Was Donald Trump’s presidency an exercise in authoritarianism and a threat to our democracy? No, it was an attempt – foiled by his enemies in the deep state – to return the country to its constitutional roots. Was George Floyd a martyr in a nation founded on white supremacism? No, he was a thug who’s been deified by race hustlers out to divide Americans along racial lines. Are corporate DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) programs a necessary measure to redress longtime prejudices and inequities? No, they’re part of a cynical Maoist attempt to compel universal acceptance of an ideology that’s utterly at odds with core American values.
I’ve compared these short volumes – which form a distinctive sequence in Horowitz’s large, storied, and wide-ranging oeuvre – to Thomas Paine’s Common Sense and other pamphlets which, in the lead-up to the Declaration of Independence, played a crucial role in setting before the American public the argument for breaking from Britain. Now, in America Betrayed, Horowitz steps back from the present historical moment and from the left’s current menu of mischievous machinations in order to elucidate the origins and essence of the American project – and the long history of malevolent efforts to derail it. Those efforts, as it happens, have repeatedly centered on race, hence Horowitz’s declaration, in his preface, that he “wrote this book to provide a concise, easily digested and accurate history of race in America to serve as an antidote to the hateful lies progressives have promoted about their own country.”
To achieve this end, Horowitz first takes us back to the Protestant Reformation. His subtitle is How a Christian Monk Created America & Why the Left Is Determined to Destroy Her; the monk in question is none other than Martin Luther, whom, despite the fierce antisemitism of Luther’s later years, he has come to admire as a key figure in the back story of America’s founding. I should mention that fans of Horowitz who are also devout Catholics may find this part of the book problematic; but he’s quite simply correct when he describes the Roman Catholic Church of Luther’s time as a deeply corrupt authoritarian institution that, with no biblical warrant, and in defiance of the plain fact that all human beings (even priests, pontiffs, and prophets) are capable of evil, had “elevated the priesthood and the Church to superhuman heights.”
Among other things, the Catholic clergy, in their arrogance, claimed to possess the power to sell salvation itself in the form of “indulgences” – a practice that Horowitz rightly condemns as an “unholy scam.” Taking on this nasty business, Luther “brought the Church to its knees” – an accomplishment that Horowitz compares to Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s role in bringing down the Soviet Union – and, translating the Bible into German so that his followers could read the Word of God for themselves, accustomed them to the notions of freedom of conscience, the sanctity of the individual soul, and “the priesthood of all believers.” As Horowitz explains, the United States of America could never have been established – at least in the form that we know it – without a basis in these principles of Luther’s, which by the mid-18th century had come to be embraced by most Christians in northern Europe. To quote from America Betrayed: “The sanctity of the human soul: this is the foundation of all democracy and the nemesis of human tyranny.”
Of course, a generation of young Americans are now being taught – thanks in large part to more recent unholy scams like the New York Times’ mendacious 1619 Project – that their country was, uniquely, built not on the sanctity of the individual but on the evil of slavery, and that the enslavement of Africans was, from the outset, justified by its defenders entirely on the basis of racial superiority. Horowitz shoots down these falsehoods with bullets of truth. For example:
- The institution of slavery, far from being distinctively American, has existed in every time and nation since the dawn of history.
- America inherited slavery from the British, and, in recognition of its inherent evil, banned the slave trade in 1808 – only 21 years after the signing of the Constitution.
- The people who came to America as slaves were captured not by Americans but by their fellow Africans, who then sold them to Europeans.
- Only a tiny percentage of the slaves transported to the Western hemisphere – to say nothing of the even more massive number of slaves who were shipped eastward from Africa – ended up in what is now the United States.
- Slavery in America was “relatively benign,” as demonstrated by the rapid growth (even after the slave trade ended) in America’s slave population.
- At the time of the Civil War there were 500,000 free blacks in the U.S., 3,000 of whom owned slaves – which belies the notion that it was “all about race.”
- Of 2.7 million Union soldiers, 360,000 died in the Civil War. In all history, there is no other example of one race making such sacrifices to free another.
- Slavery still exists today – not in any majority-white country, but in black Africa and the Muslim world.
No, far from being rooted in America’s founding principles, black slavery was, from the beginning, an affront to them. Most of America’s founders recognized this, and knew that one day the slavery question would have to be decided once and for all, probably on the field of battle. Given the number of soldiers who made the ultimate sacrifice to end slavery, the 1619 Project’s lies are, as Horowitz puts it, “as malicious as The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.”
To be sure, as in any society where multiple ethnic groups have lived side by side, there have always been ethnic frictions in the U.S. And yes, there has been terrible racism. But it wasn’t as prevalent in the colonial era as it was in the antebellum Republic – especially in the Southern states – in the decades leading up to the Civil War, where defenders of the “peculiar institution,” living in a country founded on freedom and equality, had no argument for their position other than that those principles didn’t apply to black slaves. And why? Because, they maintained, those slaves, by virtue of their race, were by definition unequal, and thus unentitled to freedom. Needless to say, they had a weak case – and an un-American one. What was “distinctly American,” in other words, in the prewar arguments over slavery “was the declaration of equality embraced by the American majority, not the racist defense of slavery by the soon-to-be-defeated slaveholding majority.” Alas, the notion that blacks were naturally subordinate to whites persevered in the South for a century following the Civil War, providing a justification for Jim Crow and, during the presidency of the Virginia-born Woodrow Wilson, for the introduction of Dixie-style racial segregation into the federal government – a policy that was not reversed until World War II.
If the civil-rights movement of the mid-20th century won so much support – and accomplished so much reform so quickly – it was, affirms Horowitz, because the message of freedom and equality preached by the Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr., was consistent with, and indeed firmly rooted in, America’s founding values – and, in turn, in the teachings of Martin Luther. One wonderful detail that Horowitz mentions here came as news to me: King’s father, who, like him, was a Baptist minister, was actually born Michael King, but, after he learned at a conference in Germany about the life and teachings of Martin Luther, he changed his name to Martin Luther King.
Thanks to Dr. King’s approach, the transformation of race relations in America during the second half of the 20th century was nothing short of miraculous. Dr. King had called for America to “live out the full meaning of its creed” – and it did. Yet in the 1960s and afterwards, even as racial prejudice was steadily diminishing on both sides of the Mason-Dixon Line, race hustlers were stepping up their efforts to sow division. Jews had played an outsized role in the civil-rights movement, but hatemongers like Stokely Carmichael (aka Kwame Ture) and Louis Farrakhan depicted Jews as devils. And in the 21st century, the Democratic Party, which had been the home of the KKK, reaffirmed its role as the “party of racial divisions” (Horowitz’s apt phrase) by embracing the tribalist – and explicitly Marxist – movement known as Black Lives Matter.
It goes without saying that Barack Obama would never have been elected (and re-elected) president if America had not overcome the blight of racism. But once ensconced in the Oval Office, he spoke of racism as America’s founding sin and of black slavery as if it had been a uniquely American evil. No surprise there: Obama was a devout disciple of the pernicious political theorist Saul Alinsky, who in books like Rules for Radicals preached that mankind is divided into oppressors and oppressed, and that the radical’s job is to drag down the former and empower the latter. During Obama’s presidency, the toxic notion of America as a “white supremacist” nation in which the oppressors had always been white and the oppressed always black became nothing less than establishment orthodoxy. So it is that those of us who reject this premise are now faced with the daunting task of somehow returning America to its senses, to its values – to itself.
By turns infuriating and inspiring, America Betrayed is a masterpiece of concision, tracing the American idea – the real American idea – from its Protestant roots to the present day with remarkable precision and clarity. Horowitz’s preface alone is full of sentences that should be carved in stone somewhere:
- “Given the prejudices and bigotries that are endemic to human beings of all races, Americans can be proud of their racial past and its contribution to human freedom, and especially the freedom of African Americans.”
- “Three hundred and sixty thousand mainly white Union soldiers sacrificed their lives to free black Africans enslaved by their brothers.”
- “From America’s inception there was always a white movement of dedicated abolitionists, many of whom were willing to give their lives to win freedom for all blacks. There never was a successful revolt by the slaves themselves. If white Americans had been universally racist as leftists maintain, blacks in America would still be slaves. Instead, thanks to the sacrifices of white Americans, they are the most prosperous, most privileged, and free-est blacks in the world today, including all of black Africa and the West Indies.”
It’s fascinating, moreover, to learn about what the author refers to as his own youthful “flirtations” with Christianity. A lifelong secular Jew, Horowitz was nonetheless, for a time, a “Christian romantic.” During his second year of college, he was permitted to deliver a sermon at a Lutheran church in which he discussed Oscar Wilde’s short story “The Happy Prince,” which, in Horowitz’s view, “captured the Christian message.” Horowitz calls Wilde’s story “poignant,” and I found this anecdote itself quite poignant, because it captures something of what makes Horowitz stand out from all other conservative intellectuals of his generation. Which of them, after all, can you imagine as a 1950s college kid, preaching from a Lutheran pulpit about a story by Oscar Wilde, of all people? This passage, along with a handful of other autobiographical references, imbue America Betrayed with an affecting personal touch that makes it seem at times less similar to one of his potent political jeremiads of recent vintage and more reminiscent of his pithy meditative volumes with titles like A Point in Time. It is, in any event, a gem of a book, and should be read by everyone who’s been swayed by the left’s loathsome lies about race in America.
Luther was an honorary member of the Rosicrucians – an occult secret society dating back to 1188 which was the precursor to the Freemasons. Their main task was to obliterate the sacrifice of the mass from the face of the earth which was spearheaded by Luther. He was in fact in direct league with Lucifer. His “Colloquy With The Devil” in 1522 is documented in Abraham Woodhead’s book: The Spirit of Martin Luther (1867). Therein is discussed his ‘negotiations’ and ‘conferences’ with the devil. In his “de Missa Privata & Sacerdotum Unctione (1533) Luther wrote of his “long experiences with the Satan’s arts and practices’ and of “many a sad and bitte night” spent in talks with him. Luther’s ‘colloquy on the mass” is what turned him against ”the holy sacrifice’ in which he would never say mass again. On that occasion the devil ‘in a grave and strong voice’ persuaded Luther he had committed ‘idolatry’ for fifteen years by adoring and causing others to adore ‘naked bread and wine.” Luther’s doctrines are born of Satan.
“Luther’s doctrines are born of Satan.” And I suppose the selling of indulgences is not?
He was killed by the Catholic Church after many trials. When He at last said the Pope was not the Vicar of Christ. Which is not supported by Scripture. Martin Luther is the true Martyr. Warts and all
Luther regarded Pope Leo X as the antichrist and the RCC as the ‘Synagogue of Satan.’ Small wonder it is, since Leo tried to kill him. Most scholars today believe that Leo was gay, and Luther knew of it and all the corruption and decadence in Rome. In any case, Leo was only one in a long line of morally corrupt popes.
Succeeding popes sent armies to massacre anti-papal Christians primarily in the German speaking lands well into the 17th century simply because they didn’t believe that the Bishop of Rome had any more authority than any other bishop of the Christian churches.
Millions were slaughtered in the 30 Years War (1618-1648) alone because the rulers of the principalities supported the reformed churches. The papal armies were instructed to kill everyone in such a principality, “protestant” or Catholic. The RCC didn’t even recognize protestants as Christians until the 20th century.
As for Luther’s antisemitic views, they were likely the result of dementia in the last 10 years of his life because in his younger years, he was known to advocate tolerance for Jews. And in that timeframe, Luther routinely flew into fits of rage, although these he directed at clerical colleagues or church members.
Is the book available in hardback?
Another bitter, table for one moment for our permanently disgruntled loser. As always your idiotic opinions are in the permanent minority.
Your obsession with Aristotle is beyond annoying in as much as you simply parrot your hero Lenny F**k-off who likes Aristotle and Aquinas. After all, God forbid the country be founded on the basis of the teachings of a religious man. That would leave objectivism out in the cold. It already is.
I notice you never mention which Founder(s) were influenced by Aristotle or which ones were influenced by Luther. All I know is that there are many many more followers of Luther in this country than the dead Greek.
Western Men have been reasoning since the current version of Western Europe began coalescing some 2000 years ago, with or without Christianity, or Aristotle. It’s what humans do. It sets us apart from doctrinaire idiots like you who are incapable of reason.
I guarantee you that 99% of the people in this country don’t care who the Founders were influenced by, and never will.
Have fun with your irrelevant obsessions.
Most certainly, the plot is to remove America from being a positive influence and standing for Freedom in the world, is on the horizon., This one World Government that is taking over the world will be a government of absolute tyranny and loss of freedoms.
Without a sweeping Biblical, spiritual, ethical renewal in her churches the country will continue to quick time march to the dumpster pile of failed nations………………2 Chronicles 7:14.
The need is for armed patriots!
how ridiculous luther was a deeply corrupt individual who sold his soul for sex allowing his followers to raid convents and intriguing with various aristocrats as this entire episode really can be properly viewed as only a “looting” party of the material treasures of the Church. England never recovered nor has the continent.
there were no irreconcilable theological issues at play here. After the church basically saved western civilisation from the barbarian incursions deterring as one example the musloids in places such as montenegro, lepanto, vienna and the reconquista of ferdinand and isabella this moral monster appears and cleaves christendom. Never mind the monastery system which created modern science and whose hospitals were just on the brink of producing what we term modern anesthesia. really David this is not worthy of you. Reform certainly but luther was pursuing a quest for raw power and it is good to see the “fruits” of his efforts disintegrating in our time. Try warren carroll founder of christendom college or the comments of E Michael Jones who whatever his other defects understands clearly the reality behind the monster
Whatever corruption Luther may have been party to, it did not compare to the corruption of the Vatican under the Medici popes. His journey to Rome was what opened his eyes. The Vatican almost bankrupted itself through its debauchery, and sought to replenish its coffiers by convincing the simple uneducated faithful that certain donations would reduce their time in Purgatory, among other things. Say what you want about the man, but he was the first to call out the Vatican on this. This is called an irreconcilable theological issue. Not exaclty the work of a monster.
Respectfully, your post is a sewer of ungrammatical lies.
The Betrayal started when American joined the United Nations it just took Clinton(Bill) Obama and Biden and two Bushes as well to continue that betrayal
David Horowitz’s writings should be required reading in American schools,
beginning at least in High School and through the College and University years.
In direct league with Lucifer? I guess I missed the memo on that one. As they saying goes about opinions: everybody has one.
“The sanctity of the human soul: this is the foundation of all democracy and the nemesis of human tyranny.”
You don’t have to be a Catholic, much less a member of any Christian denomination to understand the essential truth of the above statement.
Whatever the pros and cons of the antagonists in the reformation, the apparent thesis of David’s book that Protestant thought was a fundamental bedrock upon which the political thought of colonial America was based is well founded. From the Mayflower Compact through Roger Williams and the formation of the autonomous Congregational Church, the colonists were steeped in an abiding individualism that became the framework for our nation.
I was a Peace Corps Volunteer in Liberia in the late 60’s. My 50 hut bush village that would fit on a par 4 fairway. While “walking about” one day, I noticed a very old unmounted brass cannon about 30 inches long and very heavy. It looked like an old pirate cannon from the movies. I asked the kid I paid to bring water from the creek and also wash my clothes further downstream what that cannon was for. He said it was a slave signal cannon. The slave ships would arrive on the coast and fire cannons to signal slave holders in the interior to bring their slaves forward. Selected villages had these cannons to relay the signal to villages further to the interior. The kid also told me that when the slave trade dried up the remaining slaves were released to go back home or stay in the village. Believe it or not, some stayed and to this day there is an invisible line in town depicting slaves’ huts from non-slaves. I did not know where this line was but the kid knew just where it was.
I never hear a word about the 12 million black slaves that were shipped from Africa to Brazil to work in that country’s sugar cane fields. In contrast, the US only received 388,000 slaves shipped from Africa.
The average life span of a slave in Brazil was 6 years.
Much of the greatness of the history of the United States of America is because this nation was, mostly founded and based upon the Judo- Christian percepts and the concepts and values of Bible based Christianity and not Islamic precepts and “values.”
As the second President of the United States, John Adams, had, so well, declared when he wrote that “The general principles upon which the Fathers achieved independence were the general principles of Christianity …. I will avow that I believed and now believe that those general principles of Christianity are eternal and immutable as the existence of God.”
The exact date of this posting is May 18th 2024 which is Armed Forces Day.
With this twenty- first century war of ideas since September 11, 2001 with the threats from the many dangerous and deadly malice-filled jihadists of different menacing jihad entities as ISIS and al Qaeda as well as that threating belligerent and hostile anti- United States Islamic regime of Iran. With all its life threating and destructive long-range missiles and drones is definitely a risk to America and the American people.
Therefore, it’s very important, practical and even necessary to remember the wisdom of two of America’s Founding Fathers, especially now since it’s Armed Forces Day.
George Washington who, rightly, declared, “To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace.” He also, wisely, said “However pacific the general policy of a nation may be , it ought never to be without an adequate stock of military knowledge for emergencies.” Of course, Washington also included weapons along with knowledge.
One of the other and related reasons who all this crucial with this post 9/11 world has been explained by Thomas Jefferson who has advice with applies even more now since his own time ,because of the vicious irrational savage murderous violence by the Muslim terrorists . For Mr., Jefferson had, truly, written, “With ever barbarous people….force is law.”
The RCC did a lot of good, for some 1100 years. Luther’s decanting of Christianity from the ever more corrupt RCC clergy returned the true Church to it’s proper path.
It will ever be an embarrassment to Lutherans that in his 77 page tirade he sounds like a Benedictine or Franciscan inquisitor.
After Luther’s death, his colleagues were so embarrassed by that document they buried that bizarre tirade (The Lies of the Jews) in a church basement where it remained until the Nazis unearthed it to “prove” that Martin Luther was one of them.
For all the good Horowitz does, he’s had trouble defining his own religion and thus his view of some other religions.