Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
[Craving even more FPM content? Sign up for FPM+ to unlock exclusive series, virtual town-halls with our authors, and more. Click here to sign up.]
The problem with solving problems is that once they are solved, no one needs the solver anymore. The better kinds of problems are recurring problems that ensure customer retention, employing plumbers, locksmiths and police officers, but the best kind are the completely unsolvable problems.
And those are the only kinds of problems that the Left wants to solve.
Given enough human ingenuity and technological development, most problems can concievably be addressed and that is why the Left has to contrive to make them unsolvable by either causing the problem (homelessness), defining it in such a way that it is inherently unsolvable (equity), defining the inappropriate problem while obscuring the actual problem (gun violence) or inventing fake problems (global warming) that can never be solved because they don’t exist in the first place.
Why create unsolvable problems? They’re a virtually infinite source of money and power.
The Left came into being by defining inequality as its signature problem. Since inequality is a factor of human nature and every attempt to solve it involves creating more inequality, it was the perfect unsolvable problem. But the primal leftist error was defining inequality in social and economic terms. Growing technology and social mobility made both social and economic inequality managable even as leftits were building up a full head of steam, toppling governments and setting off revolutions.
(Manageable is a long way from the equity ideal, but it’s all most people actually want from life.)
Eventually, by default, the only ‘unequal’ people left to advocate for were the dysfunctional whose lives could not be improved through their own efforts. Criminals, addicts, the lazy and those with poor impulse control became the last outpost of the working class proliteriat who would not work.
The working class who would not work became the new vanguard of the revolution. The wealthy student revolutionaries who also didn’t want to work went to war against society on its behalf. Along the way they lost the working class who did want to work and never looked back. The working class who would work became the new bourguese and the enemy of the non-working working class.
The social and economic theories of socialism depended on the idea that there were no individuals, only societies, and that individual dysfunction was really social dysfunction. The worse the individual, the worse the society. Solve the society and the criminals and junkies would become research chemists. And they would be if only society were not holding back their potential through systemic oppression.
Eventually the worst human beings on earth, serial killers, crackheads and terrorists, came to embody the leftist mission of expopsing their crimes as an expression of society’s seamy underbelly. The more evil the crime, the more it testified to the evils of the society that had brought it about. Those who were guiltiest were the most innocent among us because they had suffered the most at the hands of society. And those who were innocent were evil because their lack of crimes showed their complicity in an oppressive system. If they were truly innocent, they would also be criminals or terrorists.
In this way, good became evil, and evil became good. The problem of making good into evil had been solved long ago in the Garden of Eden, but the problem of turning evil into good was unsolvable on the leftist terms of blaming society while denying individual accountability.
Crime and terrorism became unsolvable problems because no matter how much leftists punished society by freeing criminals and turning countries over to terrorists, things never got any better.
The unsolvable problem that could never be solved went on being unsolved. Endless billions of dollars were thrown at the problem of giving evil everything it wanted so that it would turn into good.
It never worked and evil took over instead. Some leftists had desired this very outcome. Others were too foolish to understand the inevitable outcome of their adopted worldview. Most were happy to have an unsolvable problem whose solving could consume the resources of the entire planet for a billion years without doing anything except making the problem endlessly worse.
The Left’s problems are unsolvable because they are misstated to align with a simple ideological formula which always assumes that all problems are caused by those with power, that power is defined in economic terms and that the solution to those problems is the transfer of power away from those with money to leftists who will use the money to solve all the problems that they caused.
In short, industries are to be broken up and transformed into governmental organizations.
Whether it’s changes in the weather, school shootings or drug addicts lying in the street, the formula demands variations on the same solution. An industry, real estate, firearms manufacturers or oil companies, are scapegoated, followed by demands that the industry be regulated, banned and otherwise subsumed by the government. None of this has any hope of changing the amount of bums on the street, crazies in schools or the temperature outside, but it does transfer massive amounts of wealth and power from one group to another. And that is all that the Left ever really does.
The one thing that the Left will never do is solve a problem. It however excels at creating them. If there is a problem out there, it will do everything within its power to make it worse by rejecting the obvious root causes and insisting that all the efforts must be directed at its ideological formula which very often has the added side effect of juicing whatever the root cause is. Faced with crime, it insists on freeing criminals, with homelessness, it subsidizes it, with school shootings carried out by suicidal fame-hungry teens, it talks of them endlessly and makes them as famous as they could ever hope to be.
Are terrorists unleashing violence? The only thing to do is throw billions of dollars and enough territory at them so they can build a state. Is there economic inequality? Drive out businesses. Have people lost good work habits? Subsidize them so that they never learn those habits. Is there gun violence? Make sure that only the criminals have guns and have nothing to fear from the police.
And so the unsolvable problems thrive among feudal leftist outposts of urban human misery.
Eventually the problem ceases to be the problem and the Left becomes the problem. The Left claims that it knows the only way to solve all our problems, but it’s the Left that is creating our problems.
And there is no way to solve all of our problems except by defeating the Left.
Charles says
Don’t care whether you publish this or not. Just stopping by to say kudos to Mr. Greenfield. The analysis was spot on. Well worth the read.
Daniel Greenfield says
Thank you, Charles.
Mickorn says
Absolutely. Just incredible analysis. The Left created homelessness (!!!!!!!!) and global climate change is a “fake” problem, despite the plain and obvious evidence to the contrary.
This one is quite something: “The Left came into being by defining inequality as its signature problem. Since inequality is a factor of human nature and every attempt to solve it involves creating more inequality, it was the perfect unsolvable problem.”
Only a person who pretends there are no other countries in the world except the United States would make a claim like this. There are in fact dozens of examples of countries that were able to successfully reduce inequality without “creating more inequality” (WTF? really, Daniel). Even heard of Canada? Scandinavia? Botswana? Costa Rica? You might not like those forms of government (maybe you are an Objectivist, like one of your most passionate commenters), but those countries were able to reduce inequality successfully for extended periods of time.
But sure, Daniel, “the Left is the cause of all the world’s problems” is really mature and sophisticated analysis.
Frank Tavos says
Are you kidding? I live in Canada. It is a dystopian hellhole because of Justin Trudeau and his Liberal Party of Canada. In nine short years he has reduced this country from a respected middle-tier power to a quasi-third world failed state that has become a laughingstock to the rest of the civilized international community.
Inequality has become the norm, as the socialist idiots who rule over us have divided the country into the oppressed (homosexuals and lesbians, people of colour, muslims, transgenders, etc.) and the oppressors (straight white males). They stoke division and waste billions and billions of taxpayer dollars on pointless initiatives to stop climate change, “hate”, misgendering and a whole panoply of non-existent problems.
If you don’t know anything, it’s best to just say nothing because your ill-informed opinions reveal your profound ignorance and stupidity.
THX 1138 says
Altruism, the moral code of sacrifice, demands that the good be sacrificed to the evil, the rational to the irrational, life to death, the hero to the anti-hero, beauty. to ugliness, pleasure to pain, happiness to misery, achievement to failure, facts should be be sacrificed to lies.
Egalitarianism is just one more manifestation of altruism.
“Since nature does not endow all men with equal beauty or equal intelligence, and the faculty of volition leads men to make different choices, the egalitarians propose to abolish the “unfairness” of nature and of volition, and to establish universal equality in fact—in defiance of facts. Since the Law of Identity is impervious to human manipulation, it is the Law of Causality that they struggle to abrogate. Since personal attributes or virtues cannot be “redistributed,” they seek to deprive men of their consequences—of the rewards, the benefits, the achievements created by personal attributes and virtues. It is not equality before the law that they seek, but inequality: the establishment of AN INVERTED SOCIAL PYRAMID, with a new aristocracy on top—the aristocracy of non-value.” – Ayn Rand
Intrepid says
Wow, two drinking games in one day. Altruism…..is that all you have? Sitting around complaining about altruism? If that is what your individuality means most people want no part of it.
You will never be able to fix anything in this country because you are too selfish to get up off your pathetic a$$.
You are pretty much a fatuous self-centered putz. And you are calling me “one stupid MO-FO!”? You really shouldn’t try to talk like the bruthahs, silly white boy.
I think yesterday was a banner day in counting up the number of downvotes you received, Mr. Stupid Mo-Fo.
internalexile says
I don’t know. There is something to that anti-altruism argument, at times, particularly at a societal level. When people come along and say “We have a plan to perfect mankind,” and it invariably ends in more mass graves, caution is always in order. The spirit of altruism is so easily corrupted. I am not particularly a Randian, as it were, but THX’s entries are usually worth reading.
Intrepid says
And then rejecting out of hand.
Ryan says
I used to read THX’s entries regularly, because at first he comes off as maybe having some interesting thoughts. But after enough times you realize that they are all just different ways of saying the same thoughts. He is obviously is in love with Ayn Rand and idolizes her (in the Christian biblical sense), and he quotes her so often that I honestly wonder if any of his thoughts are original or simply his interpretation of her thoughts.
Gabrielle says
And Ayn, an atheist like yourself, was afforded freedom to write her books and become successful in America, a country founded on the principles of individual value and that the freedoms for each of us are unalienable and come from a sovereign creator.
So fortunate for her that she could both develop and share her objectivist point of view in her adopted nation under our declared freedoms from a G-d she has rejected. Oh the irony!
RLABruce says
Atlas Shrugged sounds like it was written by a capitalist. It always struck me as the height of hypocrisy that Ayn was a communist using capitalism to sell capitalism that she presented as communism.
THX 1138 says
Your statement is thoroughly absurd. Do you even know what an objective definition is?
You are arguing with non-sensical definitions of communism, capitalism, and atheism. Plus you are using a thoroughly twisted logic — pretzel logic.
Communism is atheistic but that does not mean that an atheist is therefore a communist. The two terms are NOT synonymous.
Intrepid says
You are arguing with non-sensical definitions of Christianity and Judaism. It is clear that, other than your warped hatred the former, and your overly convenient mish mash of simplified Objectivist history, you know absolutely nothing of the former.
Other than what you make up in your own mind to fit your preconceived conclusions, is it any wonder that you gather up those downvotes so easily.
THX 1138 says
Natural rights do not come from Yahweh, they are necessary social-political principles that protect man’s rational capacity and rational nature from other men. .
Freedom is NOT “afforded”, it is not allowed or permitted, but DISCOVERED, RECOGNIZED, and DEFENDED. Freedom and rights are not “afforded”, i.e., granted or permitted as political privileges granted by a government, but discovered, recognized, and defended by a legitimate government.
“All rights rest on the fact that man’s life [not God’s will] is the moral standard. Rights are rights to the kinds of actions necessary for the preservation of human life. Just as “it is only the concept of ‘life’ that makes the concept of ‘value’ possible,” so it is only the requirements of man’s life that make morality, and thus the concept of “rights,” possible.
All rights rest on the fact that man survives by means of reason. Rights are rights to the actions necessary for the preservation of a rational being. Only an entity with a conceptual faculty has judgment on which to act, volition with which to select goals, and intelligence with which to create wealth.
All rights rest on the fact that man is a productive being. Rights presume that men can live together without anyone’s sacrifice. If man merely consumed objects provided in a static quantity by nature, every man would be a potential threat to every other. In such a case, the rule of life would have to be that which governs the lower species: seize what you can be before others get it, eat or be eaten, kill or be killed.
All rights rest on the ethics of egoism. Rights are an individual’s selfish possessions—his title to his life, his liberty, his property, the pursuit of his own happiness. Only a being who is an end in himself can claim a moral sanction to independent action. If man existed to serve an entity beyond himself, whether God or society, then he would not have rights, but only the duties of a servant.” – Leonard Peikoff
Intrepid says
It’s good to know you reject this country as founded. Our rights come from God. They do not come from Ayn Rand, Little Lenny or you.
It’s also good to know we can’t count on you in an existential emergency, being that you are such an “individual.”
Good luck when the SHTF, loser.
Spurwing Plover says
By far Marx was far worst then even Hitler was his philosephies are behind all what happened since his books were published
David Ray says
The lethargic POS also banged the maid, got her pregnant, then discarded her like garbage . . . which gives him something very in common with another low-life Marxist; Doug Emhoff.
His book became the Bible for a secular religion, resulting in 100 million deaths – times 10 in poverty, misery, and stagnation.
Hence, you have an excellent point. His life was just like most leftists – lazy & self-indulgent; and all at the expense of others. His two books are what did the damage.
The irony is no one actually understands what’s written in ’em, so they can only glean driveling platitudes (kinda like Cackle’s speeches.)
Stephen Boronski says
Great article, I recently wrote about the homeless problem on my blog from a management standpoint. Basically what gets measured gets manipulated.
https://open.substack.com/pub/agilepmosimply/p/555-days-of-10000-steps-or-more-not?
Algorithmic Analyst says
Brilliant Daniel! Top of the line article.
Randy CA says
At some point there needs to a book, The Daniel Greenfield Reader. This article needs to be preserved in it.
Blackdog says
Excellent analysis. As you stated the left has to create problems to become necessary in a society. They are jealous non producers of anything that is desired by their fellows. Our academic system is an excellent example. It has devolved from an broad based idea of universal growth into a a whining mass of low IQ parasites
Martina Vaslovik says
Brilliant analysis Daniel, thank you, I could not have said it any better.
Frank b says
Daniel, another stunning article that concisely identifies the lefts methods .. progressives constantly create new struggles that can never be resolved as you clearly demonstrate.
The newest in the permanent stage of revolution is The morally bankrupt cult of transgenderism . Having us believe that there is a spectrum where men are interchangeable with women and vice versa.. a insane and medically, quack theory that they have put it the civil rights column.. thereby gaining immense power in the medical field,,the technical field and forcing a misuse of psychology.,thereby empowering the thought, police .
They sell a false liberation with the utopia plan that can never be reached.
With the support of the mass media, they continually break down the norms of reality and that they must constantly destroy . As we all come to witness the never ending attack the family structure thereby destroying the middle-class.
Danielle I know you’re fondness for Orwell so may I lean on his writing and leave with a quote.that you well know
“”Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.”
Orwell
Alix Brit says
Sounds like something Barack Obama or Gavin Newsom would approve of.
TRex says
Would? More like did or is or will.
Spirit of TJ says
Excellent article, Mr. Greenfield. Thank you.
Absolutely, the Left creates a crisis–always. It’s been doing so for quite some time. The Left also employs what have been called Lumpenproletariat (e.g., open borders, urban riots) to disrupt and help facilitate socio-economic and cultural revolution.
In stark contrast, the American experiment in liberty is based upon fundamental ideas such as natural law-natural rights, the individual matters, and that the sole role of government is to defend natural rights, against enemies foreign and domestic. Also, growth in virtue–moral and intellectual–and avoidance of vice is looked upon as a proper framework of civility and success. Finally, truth is something to be discovered: scientifically, philosophically, and perhaps religiously.
Contrary to that vision, Leftism believes in dictatorship and the collective. There is no absolute truth, other than the dogma the Left espouses. Leftism also rejects equality of opportunity for equality of outcome, the latter including even reparations, if deemed appropriate by radical theorists and a dictatorial few.
The intellectual antecedents of the American experiment also trace back to the classical era of Greece and Rome. Leftism–at least in modern times–originates with the philosophe Jean-Jacques Rousseau and radical French revolutionaries (Jacobins), Marx and Engels, the Frankfurt School, Mao, to cite a few.
The American experiment in liberty and Leftism are at total variance with each other. They cannot be reconciled in any way.
We Americans do not have viable and reconcilable options; we have an either/or choice.
Madison's Ghost says
A comment as insightful as the article itself!!
Bravo Zulu!!
Madison's Ghost says
A comment as insightful as the article itself!
Bravo Zulu!!
Kynarion Hellenis says
Unless I misunderstand, if all we have left to us is the either / or option, then one option serves to delay our total destruction (ballot box) while the other (not the soap box) requires drastic and ruthless action sustained over at least a couple of generations. This second option is the DUTY and response of a people experiencing “…a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object [evincing] a design to reduce them under absolute despotism….”
Heritage Americans would need to rediscover a unity amongst ourselves that now seems lacking for that second box.
I think your lumpenproletariat reference is spot on, too. The government’s forcible re-distribution of wealth from one class to another, and now including the entire world (under the guise of “equity”) will ultimately destroy us. Who does not wish to live softly upon the hard labors of another? It is the ugly truth. Inalienable rights are necessarily tied to inalienable duties. We have forgotten that second part.
Bird says
Excellent article. All true!
Steve Chavez says
DURING VIETNAM, The Com-Left, led by the CPUSA and Soviet KGB, began their takeover of our society and their Mission Accomplished was when a Communist dupe who was recruited as a young age, was groomed, polished, into a fraudster that fooled, fools…. BARACK OBAMA, the Black Supremacist and Communist!
He was born of Communists! Mentored by a Communist. He sought out Communist Professors and hung around the most radical anti-American Pro-Communist students with proof of an article he wrote: Google “Obama Sundial 1983” on CPUSA/KGB front groups that he associated with and was a member of! He moves to Chicago and photos on the net with him meeting their Communists. Valerie Jarrett, and family, are Communists. He’s a Communist who a MAGNATE TO COMMUNISTS! He then appointed the same recruits to head departments that were then used in a COUP-ATTEMPT against a sitting President and now going after a former President and other political opponents!
THEIR MISSION TODAY is to recruit the next generation of Communists we see in the streets, the riots, looters, and now supporting terrorist groups and nations! They are The Enemy Within!
JG curmudgeon says
Can’t upvote this enough!
Intrepid says
Excellent comment.
I am hoping we are coming to the end of the Obama period in American politics. They can recruit all they want but, like Harris, they will not be able to influence all but a few of the diehards.
It really started with the Hillary grift, but she didn’t have the ability to pull it off. And everyone since Obama pales in comparison. Like cheap imitations. Plus Coco Jesus is getting older and more tired.
I certainly hope Trump wins this election going away.
Kynarion Hellenis says
The left must ultimately be defeated, but what is happening now is unprecedented in our history – but has happened in world history with great success. When Assyria destroyed Israel’s northern kingdom, they exported the Jews all over the known world and replaced the local population with populations from their wide empire to miscegenation them out of existence. It worked. The Samaritan race was born, never to be assimilated and outside the promises and covenants of Israel.
Afterwards, Babylon conquered Judah, but it did not use the Assyrian tactics, allowing the Jews to maintain their identity both in their land and in Babylon.
America is not like the Jews. We do not have God’s national promises to them. There must be a unified people to fight for our existence and that unity is very questionable today.
It is likely the wildly successful cheating of 2016 will be repeated because it remains unpunished and unremedied. The leftist regime is furiously flying new voters from third world countries into all the swing states in margins greater than the 20K or so — that number being the comfortable margin for victory.
Elon and Tucker spoke of it recently and Elon says some truly stunning things that should attack the normalcy bias of most thinking people. Go to this video and advance to the 8:45 mark and listen for about 3 minutes. If Elon is right (and I think he is) we are in deep doo doo.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/10/08/elon-musk-and-tucker-carlson-discus-current-politics/
Gabrielle says
Thank you so very much. Your assessments and writing are a treasured gift to humanity!
I heard the crack of the bat….another home run hit out of the park!!!
Kurt says
Well done, Daniel.
Here is some additional information to supplement your fine piece:
http://www.collective.zone/collectivism/
Walter Sieruk says
Karl Marx with his COMMUNIST MANIFESTO an long with his three volume THE CAPITAL in which he explained his economic political/philosophical scheme for a “classless and stateless society “ in which “Everyone works according his ability and receives according to his needs.’’ has many times over by refuted and discredited by genuine economists, sociologists and historians. These scholars have thoroughly exposes the many economic fallacies and flaws of Marxism way before the collapse of Communism in Russia and the Eastern bloc nations in 1992. Therefore even the recent history of the early 1990’s disproves Marxism as extremely erroneous. So it’s Adam Smith with his THE WEALTH OF NATIONS that is valid and in contrast Karl Marx with his written nonsensical a full of folly and invalid.
So it’s highly unlikely that Communist rulers [dictators] really believe in the obvious flawed economic fallacies of Karl Marx. Nevertheless, they all still need to publicly stand firm on the teachings, principles and precepts of Communism as laid down in the many writing of Marx. This is because evil is always looking for an excuse. Therefore, Marxism is the excuse to set up and up hold tyrannical red regimes. As if those Communist dictators actually believe that in the future a “pure perfect Communist society “ will come from their tyranny . As in the saying “Being cruel, brutal and deadly for the greater good” What nonsense! Thus to uphold the ideals of Marxism, Communist tyrants as Kim Jong Un of North Korea cruelly persecute Christians. For Christians believe in the Bible and Marxism is so very weak and fragile in its nature and because it lacks sound logic and rational arguments based on reason to uphold it , the whole Marxist system collapse down to the ground In the light in information of the Bible. Since Communists don’t have a firm foot based on reality and reason to base Marxism on in which is the foundation for the heinous rule. They resort to extremely harsh severe, malicious and murderous persecution against Christians and burn their Bibles.
Walter Sieruk says
Most historians agree that Karl Marx had good intentions when he labored so many hours writing his books .Such as the COMMUNIST MANIFESTO along with his long volumes which are entitled THE CAPITAL. Those volumes and his other written works were intended to remedy the terrible social conditions of the oppressed and exploited working class.
The reality was the only further tyrannical oppression and cruel exploitation came upon humankind as a result of his error filled philosophical economic political thesis. First, this awful disaster is what may be called “The law of unintended consequences.” Second, as already mentioned above Karl Marx had “good intentions.” So this serves a proof that the old saying must actually be true. Which is that “The road to hell is paved with good intentions.”
Dr. Larry says
The Communist Manifesto reads like the utopian rantings of an adolescent mind. I am still amazed that people who think that they are intelligent ever fell for this garbage.
Alix Brit says
Sounds like people who basically don’t care about their own – especially at their own expense and the expense of their loved ones – have brought us Leftism – all in the name of “equality” of course. In New York State we are having a referendum on “Equality” – which would permit boys to compete against girls in sports and use their locker rooms and allow unlimited abortion through all the months of pregnancy – all in the name of equality, of course! The Left tries to project it as “equal rights for women”, a sort of ERA resurrected, but it would set back women decades – and their girl babies.
TRex says
Yes, and who will vote overwhelmingly for this referendum? The very women that will suffer under it, that’s who. Never underestimate the stupidity of people who think legislating “equity” actually creates it. Legislating equity for some, by necessity, creates inequity for others like there is only so much to go around. It looks more like vindictiveness to me. Reparations, anyone?.
Rob A says
Daniel:
An astute analysis but I think the one missing factor that ties all together is the fact that leftism, if you will, only succeeds when considerable efforts are made to dumb down the majority of the people and render them susceptible to leftist ideology. The left have been at this for decades and have largely succeeded.
Their path to success was via the American education system and particularly at the college and university level which have become more or less, finishing schools for newly minted leftist/Marxists. . They used and are still using the American education system to that end with only token resistance at best.
“Isms” spread by first indoctrinating the youth. The supposed adults typically don’t take is seriously and downplay it until the ism becomes a tidal wave that threatens to upset the status quo and sweep them aside.
We’ve watched that happen again and again in different forms since the 1960s and have yet to confront the matter head on in any serious way. Now the latest thing (or ism) is anti-Americanism which the leftists whole heartedly embrace because it’s “cool” and ‘down with the cause” to be anti-American.And they’ve shown no concern about the consequences. of their anti-Americanism.
However, that’s not the worst thing that has happened. Consider/ponder this:
The real danger to America is not the left or Kamala Harris. The real danger is a citizenry that is capable of entrusting such people with the presidency and the reigns of government.
TRex says
Bullseye! I might add this insurgency has now made it all the way down to pre-school with SEL and all the other crap that places actual education in the rear view mirror. We’re “educating” a bunch of sissies who grow into malcontents who think socialism won’t hurt their feelings. When just living under such conditions causes perpetual brain damage it’s easy to vote for someone who promises to share the wealth you don’t want to work for.
Dr. Larry says
Best analysis of the problem with the Left that I have ever read. Congratulations!
Steven Brizel says
Excellent analysis
Robert of Prague says
Daniel,
Excellent piece from your mighty quill.
While studying geology & earth sciences in Prague in the late ’60s, marxism/leninism were mandatory. Never touched that stuff; would be sick for the rest of my life; winged the exams. The pol-sci prof was not very bright. Have lived it since the ’50s – our Dark Ages – due to the persecution of our pro-American family. Three gens of males & my daughter are applied science STEM guys, i,e., productive problem solvers. Main reason we can’t stand the L-regressives, apparatchiks, commissars, parasites, et al. Been fighting & mocking them for a 100 years. And, main reason we support Israel, save the Jewish commies (e.g., Frankfurt School). Your scientists are brilliant. Even my famous nuclear physicist grandpa freely admitted while having had studied in Berlin under Otto Hahn & being friends w/ Mme Curie that Einstein, Max Planck & the Curies were out of his league.
Apropos fictitious problems, didn’t one Chicago schmuck who served w/ hussein obaMao say, “never let a crisis go to waste?”
One more insight from ‘Hautnah’ (skin-close) experience w/ the Red thugs. The brutal street revolutionaries were/are replaced w/ apparatchiks of the deep state. They are cunning & insidious. The sadistic street thugs are doing their dirty work. The burauc-rats, media & radical academics also rewrite history – see G. Orwell. The sheeple are oblivious. Nothing new under the sun…
Snowfrog says
Great and insightful article. Bravo!!!!! Have you noticed the latest problem that the deviant left is trying to create? This manufactured problem was revealed by Hilllary and Kerry yesterday when thy claimed that the left is losing control of the information that the public is exposed to. She said that “misinformation” is a danger to society. She claims that unscientific and irresponsible information is a danger to our society. Let’s break this down; we live in America and have freedom of speech that was paid for by millions of men and woman who were defending freedom. The left has condemned the attack on legitimate science by replacing it with political science (science mixed with politics is political science). Is more information a problem? It is a problem for Kerry and Clinton who assume that they are arbiters of the truth. Where do they get the authority to even make such statements? From dummies like some of the responses to Daniel’s article defending this aberration of freedom.
Another example is the drug problem that put hundreds of thousands of addicts on the street and appeased them with tents and giving them space on a sidewalk as they stare into space. This problem would take Trump about five minutes to solve. But the governor and liberal elites of California perpetuate the problem and put the burden on the residents of the beautiful state of California. Do you see how this works? Enable the drug addicts to continue to feed their addiction while financially supporting them. Their strategy is to continue to allow these addicts to be a burden with no actual resolution except to fund them with taxpayers’ money. The problem is not going to be solved because they don’t want to solve it. They would rather brag about their tolerance and make the citizens pay the price for drugs and crimes, than attempt to solve it with tough love.
There are many examples that we could list that support Daniel’s claim that the left only wants to drag out problems, collect their salaries and appear to be the rescuers of the oppressed. America needs to be saved from the left.
RS says
Throughout the ages, its the left that has caused the uprisings and the pitted people against each other.
Jeremiah says
“Leftists”?
We are our misfortune—and everyone else’s.