Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
[Want even more content from FPM? Sign up for FPM+ to unlock exclusive series, virtual town-halls with our authors, and more—now for just $3.99/month. Click here to sign up.]
After the organized attacks on individual Jews and Israelis in Amsterdam, in which Muslim mobs went racing through the city to find Jews to punch, and kick in the head, and leave bleeding and in some cases unconscious on the ground, Amsterdam’s Mayor Femke Halsema correctly described the horrific events as a “pogrom.” She has had a chance to think things over, however, and she now says she regrets using such a term. More on her new view can be found here: “‘Amsterdam riots were not pogrom,’ mayor says, defending Muslim population,” by Yuval Barnea, Jerusalem Post, November
Amsterdam Mayor Femka [sic] Halsema said she regretted calling the riots in Amsterdam a “pogrom” because this was being used to discriminate against the Moroccan-Muslim population of the city, Dutch media reported on Monday.
So she regrets using the term “pogrom” not because it does not apply to the attacks on Jews in Amsterdam, but because it does. But nothing must be done to make those who committed this pogrom — Moroccan Muslims in Amsterdam — feel they are being “discriminated against.” So let’s just drop that term “pogrom” so that those Moroccans will not suffer — either psychically or in any other way. Where’s the sympathy for them?
The riots that erupted following an Ajax-Maccabi Tel Aviv game led to mass violence throughout the city. Large groups attacked people they suspected were Jewish or Israeli, often demanding to see their identification to confirm their ethnicity.
In an interview with Dutch state media NOS, Halsema said that she would not use the term “pogrom” to describe the events again and that it was wrong to do so initially.
At first, she said at the press conference immediately following the riots that “young men on scooters crisscrossed the city looking for Israeli football fans. It was a ‘hit-and-run.’ I fully understand that this brings back memories of pogroms.”
She backtracked on these comments, saying she did not want to make a direct comparison with pogroms and that she was merely trying to empathize with Jewish Amsterdammers.
However, Halsema said during a debate in the city council last Tuesday [Nov. 12], before the most recent interview, that she still fully supported the use of the term “pogrom.” She admitted that the city’s municipality, police, and Public Prosecution Service had not succeeded in keeping the city safe….
So within a week, she went from “fully supporting” use of the term “pogrom” to denouncing its use. What happened?
“The Israeli government spoke of a ‘Palestinian pogrom on the streets of Amsterdam,’ and in The Hague, the words were used to discriminate against Moroccan Amsterdammers – Muslims. That is not what I meant or what I wanted.”…
Israel’s matter-of-fact and accurate description of the attacks on Jews in Amsterdam as a “pogrom” becomes, in Halsema’s view, a sinister tool of Israeli propaganda, encouraging a negative attitude toward Moroccans in the Netherlands, and even discrimination against them. Or perhaps those Israeli propagandists were trying to place the blame for the Amsterdam attacks on all Muslims; Halsema must think that those Israelis are capable of anything. She offers no examples, of course, of any increase in “discrimination” toward Moroccans in Amsterdam. Might that be because there hasn’t been any such increase?
De Telegraaf later reported that police initially believed that the rioters were looking for a group confrontation, and only after the event had begun did they realize the purpose was to assault individual Israelis.
Those Muslims were determined to assault not just “individual Israelis,” but also anyone, of whatever nationality, who was Jewish.
Their barbarism was fueled not by anti-Israel animus, but by antisemitism.
This “Jodenhacht” or “Jew Hunt” certainly deserved to be called a “pogrom.” Mayor Halsema thought for the first week that that was the proper term. Then, quite suddenly, she decided the charge of “pogrom” would stigmatize her city’s Moroccan population. Was she wrong to initially “try to empathize with Jewish Amsterdammers” who were, along with Israelis and Jews from all over, the victims of severe attacks by Muslim Arabs from Morocco? Why this sudden decision to minimize the severity of the attacks by no longer describing them as “pogroms”? Why was her empathy now reserved for the Moroccans in Amsterdam, complaining about the use of the word “pogrom”? Could it be that the mayor, in the days since the first attacks occurred, has been considering the number of Muslim voters, and the far smaller number of Jewish voters, in the city where she wants to continue serving as mayor?
Spurwing Plover says
Violent Muslims all need to be returned to where they Came from and all Further Travel from those Terrorists Nations Banned and pull America out of the UN
Intrepid says
Ah….thank you for your contribution and support for my campaign, Mohammed.
Ah….thank you for your contribution and support for my campaign, Achmed.
Ah….thank you for your contribution and support for my campaign, al-Sisi.
Ah….thank you for your contribution and support for my campaign, Mohammed.
My name is Femke Halsema and I promise to never use the word progrom again against my muzzie buddies, because it upsets my Muslim friends. Would you believe I told the truth about them and they actually threatened me?
More money please.
Chief Mac says
She is part of the pogroms and needs to be charged as a co-conspirator for her actions. Perhaps the ICC can be bothered to investigate real genocide but I doubt that will ever happen
BLSinSC says
Why are people so concerned about “discriminating” or “offending” the muslim hordes? They should be more concerned about protecting their OWN citizens and removing those who wish to cause harm to individuals and, more importantly, THEIR NATIONS!! It’s like a cancer that must be treated and either removed or the patient will perish! It’s not “anti-religion” – it’s SURVIVAL!! There’s enough evidence to show that those people are intolerant and militant. Their ideology is 7th Century – return them to their home Nations and let YOUR Citizens live in PEACE!
Darryl says
Amsterdam Jews need to leave and make Israel their home. The Dutch are too weak to offer any form of protection from the lawless mobs that have become Europe’s number one priority and future.
The old Europe is as childless and as futureless as a Babylonian who’re.
These Muslim fascists are worse than Nazis when it comes to exterminating Jews. It is a divine order from their hellish version of the demonic god that they worship.
skam says
“has been considering the number of Muslim voters, and the far smaller number of Jewish voters”
That is exactly the point. It is the same reasoning and kowtowing to the muslim vote across mainland Europe and in Great Britain.
Tom Samek says
It far simpler. The Radical Muslims will commit acts of terror in retaliation for “Islamophobic” remarks that cast them in a negative light.
Whereas, we Jews will continue to be law-abiding model citizens and try not to upset anyone.
Paul says
Leftist politicians want to use the radical violent Muslims for their control over the people but they fear the radicals and you can’t control what you fear. I spent some time visiting Europe and enjoyed the visit but I don’t ever want to return there because they have destroyed Europe with their policies.
DGray says
Violence against the Jews and Infidels is just what Muslims do! How is possible their intentions are so misunderstood? Politicians in denial destroys many lives.
Henry Szubzda says
…. or relocate here to the USA.
I have been all over the country during my long life and have never personally heard an antiemetic or racist comment.
Chief Mac says
Then you have been sheltered, because I have heard many
Annie45 says
As is par for the course with Muslims – maybe Halsema received
serious death threats from them against her and her family for
putting any Muslims in a bad – albeit truthful – light.
So she is now -suddenly- protective of those Muslims instead of
the beaten up and terrorized Jews.
Maha says
Moroccan Muslims committing violence against Jews in Amsterdam? There SHOULD be a negative attitude about them, and a campaign to round them up. As a matter of fact, the Major should be working toward deporting as many of them as she can, and stop whining about “Israeli propaganda.”
jcr says
If a new NAZI group set up camp in Amsterdam, it would be world, front page news.
Someone please explain, how is islam different?
Maximus Peperkamp says
It is all about social pressure and fear of retaliation.. Strictly speaking, however, it is about how we use our language, to either clearly describe what we are doing and how we are behaving or to hide and lie about what is really going on, because of our belief in inner language, mind, thought. All belief – political, psychological and spiritual – is based on the falsehood of words and sentences within our skin. We have yet to acknowledge this fact.