Somewhere deep underground there's a guy throwing darts at a big dartboard.


	Who's going to be the next victimhood group?


	Apparently,<a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/doctors-move-end-bias-overweight-patients-rcna29680"> fat people</a>.&nbsp;

<blockquote>
	
		Doctors often approach the practice of medicine with&nbsp;an anti-fat bias&nbsp;and struggle to communicate with patients whose weight exceeds what’s considered the normal range.
</blockquote>


	There's no such as "anti-fat bias".It's an unhealthy condition, much like any other, and the job of doctors is to point that out to patients.


	If someone is smoking two packs a day, is the doctor guilty of an "anti-smoking bias"? If they insist on having promiscuous unprotected sex, are the doctors "slut shaming" them?


	If the AMA doesn't want doctors to do their jobs, they can just jettison actual medicine and attribute everything to social conditions and capitalism.


	Like they're<a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10187303/American-Medical-Association-condemned-Orwellian-new-equity-document-pushes-CRT.html"> already doing</a>.

<blockquote>
	
		The American Medical Association has come under fire for publishing an 'Orwellian' guide to 'equity' that promotes&nbsp;critical race theory&nbsp;and pushes Marxism.

	
		AMA bosses published Advancing Health Equity on October 28, complete with a list of 'problematic' words physicians should stop using such as 'vulnerable,' 'high risk' and 'minority.' The document also criticizes meritocracy and individualism.&nbsp;&nbsp;

	
		The 54-page guide argues that physicians are obligated to eliminate 'health inequities' by considering their language and the political circumstances behind certain groups, rather than focusing on individuals.
</blockquote>


	So it's time for more equity.

<blockquote>
	
		To counter that, the Association of American Medical Colleges plans to roll out in June new diversity, equity, and inclusion standards aimed at teaching doctors, among other things, about respectful treatment of people diagnosed as overweight or obese.
</blockquote>


	DEI. Is there anything it can't fix?


	Embracing,&nbsp;“There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so" should work wonders for medicine.

AMA Will Use "Equity" to Fight "Anti-Fat" Bias Among Doctors

Somewhere deep underground there's a guy throwing darts at a big dartboard.


	Who's going to be the next victimhood group?


	Apparently, fat people.

AMA Will Use "Equity" to Fight "Anti-Fat" Bias Among Doctors

How deep in authoritarian fascism was the Biden administration last year?


	Faced with parental protests in schools, the Biden administration coordinated with the&nbsp;National School Boards Association to intervene. Here's <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/media/nsba-letter-called-national-guard-military-deployed">an earlier draft </a>of what that might have looked like.

<blockquote>
	
		Early demands from the&nbsp;National School Boards Association&nbsp;to the White House included calling for the deployment of the Army National Guard and the military police to monitor school board meetings, according to an early draft letter the organization's independent review released Friday.&nbsp;

	
		In contrast to the final version, the draft of the NSBA letter said, "We ask that the&nbsp;Army National Guard&nbsp;and its Military Police be deployed to certain school districts and related events where students and school personnel have been subjected to acts and threats of violence."&nbsp;
</blockquote>


	Did the NSBA realize it went too far, did someone in the Biden admin pull the plug on a proposal to deploy the National Guard?&nbsp;


	Consider the atmosphere.


	The Biden administration had engaged in an extended and unprecedented military occupation of Washington D.C. in response to the Capitol Riot despite condemning the much lesser response to Black Lives Matter assaults on the White House and D.C. landmarks. Forced to eventually shut down the occupation, someone in the administration may have contemplated using the National Guard to regularly shut down opposition political protests. This would have been the logical next step.


	Sending in the FBI was bad enough, but the Biden admin was playing at full-fledged&nbsp;fascism in '21.&nbsp;

Biden Admin Allies Contemplated Using National Guard at School Board Meetings

How deep in authoritarian fascism was the Biden administration last year?


	Faced with parental protests in schools, the Biden administration coordinated

Biden Admin Allies Contemplated Using National Guard at School Board Meetings

Considering crime rates under Soros DA Gascon, I didn't think any special motive was needed to explain the attempted assault on Dave Chappelle. There are any number of crazies wandering around Los Angeles and the internet. And as&nbsp;attack plots go, this one didn't seem too well thought out.


	But it looks like the motive <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10843403/Dave-Chappelles-attacker-speaks-time-says-triggered-comedians-jokes.html?ito=social-twitter_dailymailus">was political after all</a>.

<blockquote>
	
		The Los Angeles man&nbsp;accused of attacking Dave Chappelle&nbsp;said he was “triggered” by the comedian’s jokes about the LGBTQ community and homelessness — as he insisted he never wanted to harm the funnyman.

	
		In an exclusive jailhouse interview, Isaiah Lee told The Post that Chappelle should be more “sensitive” when it comes to the jokes he cracks.

	
		“I identify as bisexual … and I wanted him to know what he said was triggering,” Lee said Saturday at the Twin Towers Correctional Facility in Los Angeles, dressed in brown jail garb and sporting a sling on his broken right arm.

	
		“I wanted him to know that next time, he should consider first running his material by people it could affect.”
</blockquote>


	I'm sure that next time Chappelle will run his bits past random assailants before taking it on stage.


	Obviously the story would be very different if Lee had been a white male conservative offended by jokes. We would be having a loud, vocal, and very different conversaion. Instead it took the New York Post to find out his motive. Not because he was holding it back, but because the media didn't want to know.

Dave Chappelle Attacker Was Triggered By Him

Considering crime rates under Soros DA Gascon, I didn't think any special motive was needed to explain the attempted assault on Dave Chappelle. There are any

Dave Chappelle Attacker Was Triggered By Him

This is why his own people keep <a href="https://www.politico.com/newsletters/west-wing-playbook/2022/05/22/bidens-logistical-man-extraordinaire-00034257">cutting off </a>his microphone.

<blockquote>
	
		CNN’s&nbsp;KAITLAN COLLINS&nbsp;asked Biden a follow-up question Sunday about if he had a message to North Korean leader&nbsp;KIM JONG-UN. “Hello,” Biden said, before pausing a bit and adding: “Period.”

	
		While reporters were able to hear the president, clear audio and video were almost lost because the U.S. government cut off Biden’s microphone feed prematurely. Some of the mics still caught the response in a way that was usable with subtitles. But the government cutting off the audio early has been a frequent source of frustration for reporters.
</blockquote>


	Apparently, they didn't cut it off <a href="https://thehill.com/news/administration/3497693-biden-us-would-defend-taiwan-militarily-if-china-invaded/">soon enough</a>.

<blockquote>
	
		President&nbsp;Biden&nbsp;on Monday said the U.S. would be willing to defend Taiwan militarily if China were to try and take it by force.

	
		“Are you willing to get involved militarily to defend Taiwan if it comes to that?” Biden was asked at a press conference in Tokyo alongside the Japanese prime minsiter.

	
		“Yes,” Biden responded. “That’s the commitment we made. That’s the commitment we made.

	
		“Look, here’s the situation. We agree with the one China policy… but the idea that to be taken by force, just taken by force, is just not appropriate,” Biden continued. “It will dislocate the entire region and be another action similar to what happened in Ukraine.”
</blockquote>


	I don't necessarily object to the content of the answer so much as the fact that this is the latest in a series of <a href="https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/2021/08/biden-commits-defending-taiwan-quickly-takes-it-daniel-greenfield/">back and forths on Taiwan</a>.

<blockquote>
	
		A senior Biden administration official said on Thursday (Aug 19) that US policy on Taiwan had not changed after President Joe Biden appeared to suggest that the United States would defend the island if it were attacked, a deviation from a long-held US position of "strategic ambiguity"...

	
		"They are...entities we've made agreements with based on not a civil war they're having on that island or in South Korea, but on an agreement where they have a unity government that, in fact, is trying to keep bad guys from doing bad things to them," Mr Biden said.

	
		"We have made (and) kept every commitment. We made a sacred commitment to Article 5 that if, in fact, anyone were to invade or take action against our Nato allies, we would respond. Same with Japan, same with South Korea, same with Taiwan. It's not even comparable to talk about that."

	
		A senior Biden administration official said US "policy with regard to Taiwan has not changed" and analysts said it appeared that Mr Biden had misspoken.
</blockquote>


	Article 5 obviously <a href="https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/2021/10/biden-says-dont-worry-about-taiwan-based-daniel-greenfield/">does not</a> apply to Taiwan.


	Biden asserting that the United States would fight in defense of Taiwan is a pretty aggressive position. If you take that kind of position, you have to be willing to back it up. Putting all that credibility on the line and then having a staffer pull it back again makes it obvious that Biden is not mentally functioning and that American military deterrence has no credibility.

Biden is Back to Flip-Flopping on Taiwan

This is why his own people keep cutting off his microphone.


	
		CNN’s&nbsp;KAITLAN COLLINS&nbsp;asked Biden a follow-up question Sunday about if he had a

Biden is Back to Flip-Flopping on Taiwan

There's good reason for being suspicious about this Washington Post poll because it has black people echoing woke lefty talking points even when they clearly contradict previous polls, for example having black people dismiss more police in favor of lefty holistic solutions to crime.


	But let's zero in on this <a href="https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/3496738-75-percent-of-black-americans-fear-physical-attack-based-on-their-race-poll/">absurd and racist</a> result.

<blockquote>
	
		A new&nbsp;Washington Post-Ipsos poll&nbsp;found that 75 percent of Black Americans polled are worried that they or someone they care about will be physically harmed because they are black...
</blockquote>


	How often does that happen?


	We're not talking about staged white supremacist terror attacks like Buffalo or Charleston.

<blockquote>
	
		Seventy percent of Black Americans polled said they believed half or more white Americans hold white supremacist beliefs compared to 19 percent who believed fewer than half white Americans do.
</blockquote>


	That would be a widespread conviction that most white people are not only racist but white supremacists.


	In the breakdown, 35% believe that most white people hold white supremacist views, while another 27% say that half of white people do.


	Only 8% say very few.


	That's not a survey of racism, it's a racist survey.

A Very Racist Poll About Racism

There's good reason for being suspicious about this Washington Post poll because it has black people echoing woke lefty talking points even when they clearly

A Very Racist Poll About Racism

What do American sailors read? The <a href="https://www.navy.mil/CNO-Professional-Reading-Program/">list of books</a> recommended for the US Navy has been around for a long time and is not a secret. It includes excellent books on the history of naval battles, reports on the effectiveness of various weapon systems, and naval battles' strategy elements. Of course, there have been a few oddities on this list. As an example, the US Constitution continues to be missing from this list. However, there was never something seriously reprehensible on this list – till Joe Biden became a Supreme Commander.


	The author of one of the recently <a href="https://www.theepochtimes.com/navy-chief-defends-recommending-sailors-read-anti-racist-book_3870476.html">suggested books</a> for sailors, Ibram Kendi, is known for his catchphrase, "White people are a different breed of humans." The author of the book "How to Be an Antiracist" overtly states that he hates all whites and promotes the view that whites are devils. Let me remind you that this is the 21st century.


	So far, no one has convincingly explained why such an intellectually weak and otherwise damaging book is recommended for reading in the Navy. However, it is only on the surface that the book is the quintessence of idiocy. The fact is that this book is written in a foreign language, which, however, draws its vocabulary exclusively from English.


	The language of the book is well-known; it is Newspeak. This book argues that racism and capitalism "will eventually die at the same time." The author argues that "capitalism is essentially racist and racism is essentially capitalist." Contrary to popular belief, anti-racism is not a euphemism for black racism. The situation here is reminiscent of the story with the term "global cooling." This term has been replaced by the term "global warming" and then by "climate change," whereas this term has nothing to do with climate.


	Just like modern Antifa has nothing to do with anti-fascism. Just like the phrase "Black Lives Matter" has nothing to do with black people. Moreover, both the words "Black Lives Matter" and "anti-racism" do not have any racial connotations in Newspeak.


	Likewise, Critical Race Theory has nothing to do with race. Therefore, it is not some new coherent theory, as it is solely paraphrased Marxism. The correct translation of the phrase "Black Lives Matter" from Newspeak into ordinary English is, "The life of Marxists Matter." Likewise, the accurate translation from Newspeak of the term "anti-racism" is Marxism.


	Once you know the proper translation, you begin to understand why the phrases "White Lives Matter" or "All Lives Matter" or "Blue Lives Matter" evoke such a harsh reaction from the left. After all, within the language of the left, these phrases mean "The life of anti-communists matter," which, of course, is very offensive to them.


	"White," in modern Newspeak, simply means anti-Marxist (sometimes anti-communist) and has nothing to do with the amount of melanin pigment in one's skin. This is why the word "Black" in Newspeak should be capitalized, just as it is customary in English to capitalize the word "Marxist." In other words, in Newspeak, a black is a black person, but a Black is a soldier of the revolution, a Marxist with a capital M.


	The author of the "white privilege" concept, former Harvard professor <a href="https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/07/black-camouflage-american-marxism-frontpagemagcom/">Noel Ignatiev</a> has proposed many other popular constructs of Newspeak. (Professor Ignatiev himself was – depending on what language the conversation was in – either white or Black). According to Ignatiev, "racism is a form of anti-communism." Therefore, all whites, according to the left, are anti-communists by definition.


	The message being drummed into American sailors is very simple: "You might be a racist without even knowing it." The incredible thing is that this may turn out to be true – the vast majority of sailors are really not racist, but this is only if you use the "old" definition of racism. The characterization of racism in modern Marxist Newspeak means anti-communism – and this is precisely what the sailors do not suspect. Nor do the sailors suspect that Critical Race Theory is simply a less radical and more academic (to be more precise, more pseudo-scientific) presentation of the outmoded <a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/06/the_russian_origins_of_black_neomarxism.html">communist concepts</a> of Noel Ignatiev.


	In the brainwashing of the sailors, the <a href="https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/197-military-officers-purged-by-obama/">8-year purge</a> of senior officers from the ideologically objectionable contingent during Barack Obama's presidency also played a role. This purge was similar in its parameters to Joseph Stalin's Red Army purge, although it was less extensive and less bloodthirsty. It seems that both pernicious purges have been crowned with success – in the Red Army and in the American military, political loyalty and adherence to ideological dogmas are now integral to successful careers. Unfortunately, the Biden administration has <a href="https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/biden-pentagon-trump-allies-lloyd-austin-b1797057.html">continued</a> Obama's senior officer degradation program. As in the Soviet Union, they try to make American officers not warriors but fighters on the ideological front. What percentage of military officers would like to be transformed from combatants into loyal apparatchiks?


	We should fear that foreign intelligence services will eventually find out the best-guarded secret by the Pentagon – the political loyalty of the American military is now placed above their military merit. The question of how the American and Chinese generals will behave in the event of a military conflict in the Taiwan region is also fascinating. After all, both military men have gone through a very similar ideological selection and are grounded in practically identical, sister ideologies.


	The currently quite loyal American officers seem to have liked Biden's <a href="https://breaking911.com/new-army-hair-and-grooming-standards-allow-for-ponytails-nail-polish-earrings-more/">innovations</a> – new types of hairstyles and appearance are being introduced in the US Army. Ponytail hairstyles, cosmetics, manicures, and lipstick will now be allowed (with one exception – men's nail polish must be transparent). Braids with bows and dyed hair will also be permitted for women. Can you imagine what horror American soldiers with make-up, varnished nails, and multi-colored knots of ribbons will bring to the enemy?


	One of Biden's most recent initiatives is an <a href="https://dailycaller.com/2021/06/26/biden-executive-order-crt-diversity-equity-government/">Executive Order</a> to train all federal government personnel in the basics of Critical Race Theory. Unfortunately, it looks like the actual goal of this Order would be an introduction of the institution of political commissars in America, designed to emulate the activities of Soviet commissars. Apparently, soon the left will simply forbid civil servants to think otherwise; everything that does not correspond to the general party line will prohibit any ideological dissent in the American power structures.


	Previously viewed as a purely natural phenomenon, permanent climate change is now mobilized to settle political scores. The quintessence of the insanity of the American left is the acceptance into the arsenal of political battles of such truly permanent concepts as a person's gender and race.


	Muslims call "unbelievers" (that is, non-Muslims) by the word kafir; it is against the kafirs that the jihad is waged. The left also came up with a word for all "nonbelievers" in Karl Marx's genius – "white." At the same time, whites (in the racial sense) should not attach any racial meaning to the definition of "white" in Newspeak.


	The level of "black," like the level of "white," currently denotes only the level of adherence to Marxist dogmas and nothing more.


	When you hear that "all whites are racist," don't be upset. It merely implies that "all opponents of Marxism are racists" (learning foreign languages ​​has always been beneficial, and Newspeak is no exception). As Margaret Thatcher aptly noted, "Socialists have always spent much of their time seeking new titles for their beliefs because the old versions so quickly become outdated and discredited."


	If you think that modern America resembles an absurd theater, try simply visiting the numerous websites of American communists. Everything is explained in detail, and an accurate translation from Newspeak into the language we are familiar with is given. There is no absurdity in America – on the contrary, everything is happening according to the well-known and proven plan – the plan to squeeze America out of America. As a result of this plan, visiting some areas of America with the American flag is strongly not recommended, but red flags with a hammer and sickle are welcome.


	With Biden's arrival at the White House, America took a giant leap from democracy to decadentocracy.


	The term decadentocracy, understood as the political setback and decline of the achievements of the 18th century American Revolution, perhaps best describes the current state of American society. So, what awaits American military and government officials in the next phase of decadentocracy? Marx's "Das Kapital?" "Communist Manifesto"? "Red Book" by Mao? Or the favorite book of the left in the recommended reading pantheon, "Mein Kampf?"


	Most likely, many American admirals and generals, supporters of radical leftist ideology, value themselves very highly. Hence, let's consider a modest proposal for people like them – add the memoirs of the Soviet communist Karl Radek to the recommended reading list. From the memoirs of Karl Radek, the world first learned about to whom exactly comrade Lenin assigned the nickname "useful idiots."


	Gary Gindler, Ph.D., is a conservative columnist at <a href="https://garygindler.com/">Gary Gindler Chronicles</a> and a new science founder: Politiphysics. Follow him on (soon-to-be-suspended from) <a href="https://twitter.com/Gary_US">Twitter</a>.

American Decadentocracy

What do American sailors read? The list of books recommended for the US Navy has been around for a long time and is not a secret. It includes excellent books

Karl Marx is the founding father of Marxism. Bernie Sanders is a Senator from Vermont. Matvey Blanter authored the famous Russian song "Katyusha."


	They are all Jews. They are all anti-Semites. All of them are followers of leftist ideology.


	The anti-Semite Marx isn't our contemporary, but <a href="https://www.philosophersmag.com/opinion/30-karl-marx-s-radical-antisemitism">his anti-Semitic (and racist) views</a> are well-documented.


	One among the leaders of <a href="https://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individuals/bernie-sanders">American-Jewish anti-Semites</a>, Senator <a href="https://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individuals/bernie-sanders">Bernie Sanders</a>, spent his summer holidays at a Stalinist kibbutz in Israel and celebrated his honeymoon in the USSR. Bernie Sanders, almost word for word, repeats the claims of Hamas about Israel, so it seems that he is the Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of <a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/05/where_to_get_the_vaccine_against_leftwing_antisemitism.html">Hamas</a> to the United States.


	In May 2021, Senator Sanders and his supporters managed to stab Israel in the back twice. At first, the <a href="https://freebeacon.com/national-security/house-democrats-vote-against-hamas-sanctions/">overwhelming majority of Democrats voted against</a> the announcement of sanctions against Hamas, and <a href="https://freebeacon.com/national-security/house-dems-reject-measure-to-boost-israeli-security-aid/">a couple of days later</a> – against providing additional military assistance to Israel. Voting on these bills took place when thousands of rockets were flying from Gaza to Israel. Note also that all Republicans, without exception, supported both bills.


	From a military point of view, the Iron Dome system is a strictly defensive weapon. It can't be used to attack. Its sole purpose is to save the lives of civilians. However, every Democrat within the House voted against additional funding for the Iron Dome in Israel. The rationalization of this seemingly incomprehensible solution is straightforward. Democrats give money to Iran. Iran gives money to Hamas to "purify the Holy Land from the contamination." Hamas attacks Israel. Helping Israel will reduce the effectiveness of Iranian investment by the American Left.


	Finally, let's advance on to the last name on our list.


	Matvey Blanter became laureate of the Stalin Prize for the songs "Stalin – Our Fighting Glory" and "Stalin, Flight of Our Youth." He was a member of the Anti-Zionist Committee of the Soviet Public. The committee was created by the Soviet KGB in 1983. It theoretically ceased to exist officially with the collapse of the USSR. What is interesting is that this committee had not been formally disbanded.


	In addition to Blanter, other prominent Soviet Jews were also members of the Anti-Zionist Committee of the Soviet Public:&nbsp;Elina Bystritskaya, an actress who performed the role of the primary Russian beauty;&nbsp;Tatyana Lioznova, creator of the foremost famous Soviet spy thriller "17 Moments of Spring"; and&nbsp;Adolf Shayevich, former Chief Rabbi of the Soviet Union. What did Comrade Shayevich mean when he proclaimed the traditional Zionist Easter toast "Next year – in Jerusalem"? Was he referring to the Soviet tanks at the Jaffa Gate?


	It was at the time, when Natan Sharansky was in solitary confinement, that the KGB managed to gather under one roof two dozen talented Soviet anti-Semitic Jews. Additionally, the Soviet communists injected the old anti-Semitic term with brand new, ideological content, behind which the Left became convenient to hide – the anti-Zionism. We, they say, are only against the policies of the State of Israel, but we are not anti-Semites. This "ideologically correct" term has become so common on the Left that it is still widely used today. It has been <a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/05/where_to_get_the_vaccine_against_leftwing_antisemitism.html">metastasized</a> and adopted by most Leftists, many of whom are very talented American Jews.


	These talented American Jews came up with – after the model and likeness of the Democrat Party – the notion that there is supposedly a political wing of Hamas and an independent military wing of the organization. Analogous to this are the military wings of the Democrat Party – Antifa and BLM. However, if there is some kind of separation between political and military wings, it's only for the purpose of a smokescreen.


	The Left has also redefined the meaning of the conflict in the Middle East. After the Six-Day War, the conflict was redefined by Soviet apparatchiks as "imperialist colonization." Who was chosen as "colonizers" and "oppressors"? Palestinian Jews. Who was chosen as the "defenseless indigenous population"? Palestinian Arabs.


	That is why we hear the same rhetoric from both the American Left and Hamas: it turns out that the Jews are "occupiers" and the war with Israel is "resistance to the capitalist colonialists." The Soviet Communists have achieved impressive and long-lasting success in altering the religious and territorial conflict in the Middle East onto an ideological track. The Soviet Union is long gone, but the ubiquitous train of "fighters for the independence of Palestine" continues to travel. That is why Hamas, Fatah, and Iran all use familiar Soviet propaganda clichés.


	Politically, the Palestinian Arabs have long been abandoned by their Arab neighbors. If not for the ideological and military support by the Soviet communists years ago, this conflict would have sunk into oblivion. However, the baton of support for the "liberation movement of Palestine" from the Soviet communists was taken over by the American Leftists.


	The Middle East conflict is really a series of successive conflicts. At first, it had been only a religious conflict, which grew into a territorial one with Israel's revival. In turn, the territorial conflict, due to the Sisyphean labor of Soviet communists, was transformed into an ideological conflict through the injection of Marxist rhetoric.


	(By the way, this is precisely the error that the Israeli leadership made when it withdrew from South Lebanon in 2000 and Gaza in 2005. The worldview of Israel's then-leaders was formed during the conflict's previous – territorial – phase. They did not notice – or did not want to notice – that the conflict had&nbsp;already morphed into a different, ideological phase. As a result, Israel's territorial concessions have not led to anything positive.)


	President Trump tried to finish off the ideological phase of the conflict in the Middle East and put it on a rational&nbsp;economic&nbsp;track. Trump made an offer that could not be refused in exchange for ending the multi-billion dollar financing of terrorism franchise wars, Arab countries would receive multi-billion dollar American investments. The benefit is twofold. The Arab countries generally agreed because the Palestinian problem, purely economically, is very disadvantageous to them.


	Trump tried to end&nbsp;what began long before him but had touched a raw nerve. The termination of the ideological phase of the conflict turned out to be unprofitable for the American Left, and the Biden administration returned the conflict to square one. In fact, Joe Biden uses taxpayer dollars to assist Palestinian Arabs in buying Iranian missiles to attack Israel. In addition, Biden appointed an <a href="https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/05/biden-brings-islamic-activists-investigate-us-daniel-greenfield/">Islamic activist</a> to "cleanse" the US military of "extremism." Without a doubt, Iran, Russia, and Hamas still cannot believe their luck with the current occupant of the White House. As a result, in 2021, Jews are welcomed in the United Arab Emirates and other Arab countries, but not in America.


	Anti-Semitism has been around for several thousand years, although this term has officially existed only since 1879. The overwhelming majority of more or less reasonable people perfectly understood that this nefarious phenomenon is irrational. There is not and cannot be a rational explanation for it. However, the Left decided to take the next step, and in America, under the leadership of the Floydenized Democrats, the process of normalizing anti-Semitism has begun. If before, in a decent society, anti-Semitism was a taboo, now the taboo has been lifted. The new American norm will not be the complete absence of anti-Semitism but the establishment of some level of anti-Semitism acceptable in a decent society.


	Normalizing what was previously considered impossible or unacceptable is the <a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/05/the_lefts_long_love_affair_with_criminals.html">hallmark of the Left</a>. At the beginning of the 21st century, leftists normalized the attribution of the red color (the color of enemies) for conservatives and republicans. Previously, this color was associated only with the Left. In the twentieth century, the term "Palestinians" was normalized and redefined by the Left. The term "Palestinian" had meant Jews exclusively, but since 1967, at the suggestion of the KGB, they began to call "Palestinians" exclusively Arabs. Symptoms of this normalization of anti-Semitism were the simultaneous and well-coordinated attacks on Jews in Israel, New York, and California.


	A ceasefire has now been declared in Israel. However, there is never a ceasefire in the struggle between Good and Evil, even a temporary one. Especially when Good and Evil are on opposite sides of ideological barricades.


	Gary Gindler, Ph.D., is a conservative columnist at <a href="https://garygindler.com/">Gary Gindler Chronicles</a> and a new science founder: Politiphysics. Follow him on (soon-to-be-suspended from) <a href="https://twitter.com/Gary_US">Twitter</a>.

What Do Messrs. Marx, Sanders and Blanter Have in Common?

Karl Marx is the founding father of Marxism. Bernie Sanders is a Senator from Vermont. Matvey Blanter authored the famous Russian song "Katyusha."


	They

On election day, Fox News betrayed President Trump, and this has puzzled many patriots. The confusion vanishes if one assumes that this episode could be just a small part of the process of China's colonization of America. China has already colonized some countries in the Pacific region, South America, and Africa for all practical purposes. Add to this list the de facto colonization of northern Italy and a large part of Russia in Eastern Siberia. Also, communist China greedily devours real estate and businesses in the United States.


	Therefore, the 2020 presidential election should be seen as an integral part of this process.


	From this perspective, Trump and Biden symbolize two diametrically opposed approaches to America's future. If Biden made it clear that he was ready to swear allegiance to the new master, Trump is fighting for America's economic and political independence. Biden is helped not only by the so-called "Democrats" and numerous anti-Trump Republicans but also by the world socialist movement.


	The current leading force of <a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/03/what_the_political_scene_in_china_says_about_the_coronavirus.html">palace intrigues in China</a> is Xi Jinping's group of supporters of Soviet methods: "Xi Jinping belongs to the faction long forgotten in China, which at one time was aligned with the Soviet Union and Joseph Stalin." When this group came to power, a wave of repressions swept across China, like two drops of water similar to Stalin's repressions of the 30s and 40s. China's economic policy is generally reminiscent of the Soviet one. For example, foreign companies' penetration into Chinese markets is only possible if joint ventures with China are established, and all the know-how is transferred to the Chinese side.


	Donald Trump, of course, is fighting for the presidency. Nevertheless, for Trump, the presidency is only part of a more significant challenge. Trump seeks not only to win these elections but to destroy once and for all the leftist movements in general. Obviously, it includes China and the so-called "Democrats." That is a much more important goal, and it looks like Trump would prevail. What if Trump loses? In this case, all his actions will be aimed at ensuring that by the next electoral cycle – in 2022 – no one in his or her right mind would even think to vote for (D)ecadence.


	Trump must win Americans' sympathy to achieve his goal. There is no doubt that the Trump team is acting in this direction. Numerous hearings in state legislatures, sensational statements by witnesses, mathematical and computer experts, and court hearings, of course, show a horrid picture of election fraud by "Democrats."


	Election Day has been transformed into Election Months; however, more and more Americans are convinced of the "Democrat" fraud every day. More and more Americans switch to alternative sources of information every day and thus deprive propaganda outlets of their material base. Every day more and more Americans are beginning to understand which Republican is an anti-Trumpist rooting for China and which one is a Conservative. Finally, more and more Americans are beginning to guess where the command center that issued an order to stop counting votes simultaneously in six battleground states at 2 a.m. on November 4, 2020, was located.


	Trump understands that America, unfortunately, has been dozing for the past hundred years. While we were sleeping, our Constitution was undermined. We have lost control of the Washington swamp dwellers because they prefer to be controlled by Chinese interests rather than American citizens. We just lived our lives and watched football until the international leftist movement attempted to steal our America out from under our noses.


	Trump's strategic goal is an America, which is not sleeping at the wheel.


	There is now every sign that America's sleeping giant is awake. Thanks to China – the elections they most likely helped to steal could be the Chinese equivalent of the attack on Pearl Harbor. Thanks to the "Democratic" fraudsters and their leader Joe "Yuan" Biden – the 2020 elections were the last straw.


	In 1776 we did not want to be vassals to the British king, and in 2020 we do not want to be vassals of the communists.


	China communists and their distant ideological cousins on the Left – the American "Democrats," of course, went for broke. They have in their arsenal not only economic and political methods. A very extraordinary direction of China's expansion is that the communists began to transfer their enterprises to the United States, considering our country as one of the offshore destinations for <a href="https://regtechconsulting.net/uncategorized/chinese-money-brokers-the-first-us-case-involving-an-identified-threat-to-the-us-financial-system/">money laundering</a>. Based on our knowledge of communists' methods, the most probable course of action by the Politburo of the Communist Party of China would be outright buying of politicians. It seems they calculated (quite correctly) that they need to buy a limited number – no more than a few thousand – key politicians worldwide to carry out their expansion plans. This path seems to them to be quicker and economically more feasible.


	The massive importation of drugs into the United States was one of the main activities of the Soviet KGB, for which numerous drug cartels were created (have you ever wondered why most drug cartels are in countries with strong left-wing traditions?) It was the Chinese comrades who did what the Soviet comrades could not achieve – flood America with fentanyl.


	China's espionage has reached a level that the Soviet KGB could only dream of. Under Bush and Obama, China's cyber attacks, like <a href="https://www.cfr.org/cyber-operations/titan-rain">Operation Titan Rain</a>, were incredibly successful. Consider the <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/3318238/the-opm-hack-explained-bad-security-practices-meet-chinas-captain-america.html">2013 attack</a>, when China took over the personal files of 21 million US government employees. China uses widespread blackmail and bribes to lobby her interests in Washington.


	In 2020, communist China used <a href="https://rumble.com/vbker3-gordon-chang-china-election-interference-paid-propaganda-in-us-media-china-.html">artificial intelligence algorithms</a> to identify Americans who could participate in the Antifa and Black Lives Matter pogroms (of course, the Chinese communists favor only left-wing organizations). Once identified, these Americans were sent instructions (including well-crafted videos) on organizing riots via social media. As we now know, American "Democrats" enthusiastically participated in this orgy. Finally, everybody has noticed that numerous concentration camps sprung up worldwide as a precursor to CoronaGulag.


	Trump has swung not only at the Chinese communists, not only at the "Democrats" as traditional rivals of the American conservatives, and not only at the Washington swamp. All the above suggests that Donald Trump is an historical figure on a much larger scale than it seems at first glance.


	Trump is fighting a global communist Utopia, also known as the "Global Gulag."


	The "Democrats," if they do win this battle with China's help, will find themselves in a completely new, redefined reality – the majority of the country's population will regard them as usurpers, deceitful and dishonest people. If an infirm old marionette settles in the White House, it will be a classic Pyrrhic victory, where winning a battle leads to losing the war.


	Donald Trump has been compared with Winston Churchill more than once, and these comparisons, of course, have a good reason. They are based on the similarity of the circumstances these leaders had to face. Churchill, too, found himself in a situation where he and his country were single-handedly fighting both German Socialists' horde and the numerous National Socialism and International Socialism supporters among the British establishment.


	If the socialists come to power despite Trump's actual landslide victory, then the political suicide of the "Democrats" will enter the final phase. Moreover, the American patriots who feel down in the dumps should remember one of the quotes commonly attributed to Churchill: "Success is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm."


	Gary Gindler, Ph.D., is a conservative columnist at&nbsp;<a href="https://garygindler.com/">Gary Gindler Chronicles</a>&nbsp;and the founder of a new science: Politiphysics. Follow him on&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/Gary_US">Twitter</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://social.quodverum.com/@WW_II_Historian">Quodverum</a>.

Will America Become China's Vassal?

On election day, Fox News betrayed President Trump, and this has puzzled many patriots. The confusion vanishes if one assumes that this episode could be just a

In 1933, Hermann Goering was appointed Minister of the Interior (i.e., Police Commissioner) of Prussia.&nbsp; One of Goering’s first innovations was a radical change in the priorities of police, including specific restrictions of police activities.&nbsp; The novelty of Goering’s approach was that he departed from the socialist tradition of demanding the abolition of the police, which was first proposed by Vladimir Lenin a quarter of a century before the described events in his article “April Theses” of 1917.


	Another radical proposal of Russian socialists – the closure of prisons and the release of all prisoners – has been partially implemented by some American Democrat Governors a hundred years later.&nbsp; In the spring of 2020, a massive number of criminals were released from local (non-Federal) prisons – allegedly due to the coronavirus – who then went on to make a significant contribution to pogroms, looting, and riots.


	Minister Goering’s first step was staging a grand purge of the police and hiring National Socialist Party activists with no police experience to replace the thousands of dismissed policemen.&nbsp; How could the head of police practically leave citizens to their fate without police protection? This seems more than strange, but Goering had a different task.


	The fact is that by that time, the Nazis had already created alternative police, which was subordinate only to the party – the so-called SA (Sturmabteilung).&nbsp; The SA stormtroopers wore light brown uniforms.&nbsp; This uniform was bought by the party of German National Socialists – the NSDAP – at a bargain price from the German army, which kept in its warehouses millions of units of these clothes, prepared for Germany’s invasion of Africa during the First World War.&nbsp; The invasion never took place, and the army was glad to get rid of unnecessary uniforms.


	The stormtroopers of the National Socialist Party, the SA, went down in history as the Brownshirts.


	As Minister of the Interior, Hermann Goering ordered the Prussian State police to work in parallel with the police of the National Socialist Party.


	Soon this approach was extended to the entire Third Reich.&nbsp; The task of the Brownshirts was not to protect law and order but to organize riots, pogroms, arson, and intimidation of opponents of the National Socialist ideology to strengthen their political power.


	In parallel with the radical reform of the police, a process of radical control over firearms began in Germany – at first, in 1933, it was only about the registration of military-grade weapons, and then it was time to register any gun.&nbsp; In 1935 and 1938, Germany adopted laws on the total confiscation of firearms from all “unreliable elements” (Jews, for example).&nbsp; At the same time, all restrictions were lifted on weapons for members of the NSDAP and related organizations (such as the Hitler Youth).


	As a result, the main task of the German state police was not to protect citizens but to protect the rioters.


	Democrat mobsters imitate the Nazi Brownshirts in many ways, although in some ways they differ.&nbsp; Today’s leftists decided to emulate the Blackshirts of the Italian socialist Mussolini (in clothing choice), the Brownshirts of the German National Socialists (in their methods of terror), and the Maoist Hongweibing (in ideological stubbornness).&nbsp; Blackshirts, Brownshirts, and Hongweibing are ancient practices of global leftist movements.&nbsp; In other words, in 2020, neither leftist philosophy nor the current generation of leftists in America could come up with anything new.


	Calls for the dissolution of the police or defunding of police are attempts by Democrats to transform the police from a law enforcement agency into a rioters’ protection agency.


	The irony of history is that a year later, in 1934, the leadership of the Brownshirts led by Ernst Röhm was eradicated (the official code name for this operation was “Operation Hummingbird,” but it went down in history as the “Night of the Long Knives”).&nbsp; Who eliminated the SA leaders, all of whom were loyal supporters of National Socialism? This was done by their party comrades, SS Stormtroopers, and the word “comrades” is the most acceptable here.&nbsp; The fact is that, according to the tradition established among all socialists, members of the SS called themselves that way (for example, “Comrade Sturmbannfuehrer,” not “Herr Sturmbannfuehrer”).


	The same fate awaits the American democrat goons, although, at present, no one can predict precisely how the reprisals against these leftist militants will take place.&nbsp; Only one thing is known – the reprisals against these Democrats will be carried out by the Democrats themselves as part of an internal power struggle.&nbsp; In the same way, Maximilian Robespierre, one of the founders of the leftist ideological terror, fell under the guillotine at the hands of his fellow revolutionaries.


	If the SA militants in Germany were replaced by the SS militants in 1934, then someone else will replace the white Antifa stormtroopers, and black BLM stormtroopers for there are enough left-wing terrorist organizations in America.&nbsp; Perhaps the go-ahead for the internal crackdown against Antifa and BLM will be given immediately after Biden’s loss on November 3 this year.


	From a Machiavellian standpoint, the Democrat Party thugs – Antifa and BLM – are simply an extraordinary political gift.&nbsp; Who needs agent-provocateurs if your political opponent has such renegades? Do not forget that the primary damage from democratic pogroms falls solely on the democratic states and democratic enclaves.&nbsp; For months now, the “peaceful democratic rioters” have been dragging the model of the “peaceful guillotine” around the democratic enclaves.


	As a result, the new symbol of the Democrat Party of America has become not just a donkey, but a donkey carrying a guillotine.


	It is unlikely that any vacillating Republicans or other indecisive voters would dare to associate themselves with such a party.


	It took Biden three months to formulate and present his opinion on the subject.&nbsp; Portland has been burning for three months, and finally, Joe Biden made a statement in which he did not condemn – no – he just chided his supporters for “unnecessary violence.” Biden basically said that you guys are doing noble work, but still, the destruction of capitalism should not take such overt forms.&nbsp; Biden believes that burning entire city blocks to the ground is overkill.&nbsp; It took a person who positions himself as the future leader of the free world three whole months to come to this conclusion.&nbsp; Anyone, even a person who is very far from politics, understands that this is just a mockery of common sense.&nbsp;


	It is an admission that Biden did not, does not, and will never have leadership skills.


	Only a complete political dilettante does not understand that by the end of summer 2020, the political train to Washington has already left the station.&nbsp; To jump on the last wagon, Biden had three months to harshly condemn the rioters, as Donald Trump did.&nbsp; Biden missed this opportunity, and now the Democrats will be inevitably defeated in two months.


	After the defeat, an intraspecific massacre among Democrats will begin, which the history of America has not yet seen.


	Gary Gindler, Ph.D., is a conservative columnist at&nbsp;<a href="https://garygindler.com/">Gary Gindler Chronicles</a>&nbsp;and the founder of a new science: Politiphysics. Follow him on&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/Gary_US">Twitter</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://social.quodverum.com/@WW_II_Historian">Quodverum</a>.

Ernst Röhm, Maximilian Robespierre, and Democrat Party Stormtroopers

In 1933, Hermann Goering was appointed Minister of the Interior (i.e., Police Commissioner) of Prussia.&nbsp; One of Goering’s first innovations was a radical

When you come to another country, the standard recommendation concerning language is to learn a few phrases in advance that you will definitely need. For instance, a traveler to France would need to know what Bonjour means, and a traveler to Germany would benefit from learning Guten Tag.


	Without these basic language skills, they are bound to find themselves at a major disadvantage.


	To the same extent, this applies to the modern language of Leftists – Newspeak.


	Newspeak, widespread among American socialists (in Newspeak, they call themselves Democrats), differs from all other languages ​​in that it has a strikingly high percentage of words borrowed from classical English. Although, these words have a completely different meaning for the Newspeakers.


	For example, the phrase “Black Lives Matter” in Newspeak has nothing to do with black lives. Moreover, in Newspeak, this phrase has no racial connotation at all.


	The correct translation of “Black Lives Matter” into plain English is “Marxists Lives Matter.”


	Only by knowing the correct translation can one avoid violence when speaking to “peaceful” rioters, “peaceful” vandals, and “peaceful” rapists. Only by understanding the correct interpretation can one begin to comprehend why the phrases “White Lives Matter” or “All Lives Matter” cause such a sharp, violent reaction from the Leftist ersatz-revolutionaries. Indeed, in the language of the revolutionaries, “All Lives Matter” means “Anti-Communist Lives Matter” -- which is very offensive and defiant for all Leftists.


	“White,” in Newspeak, simply means an anti-Marxist (sometimes an anti-communist) and has nothing to do with the amount of melanin pigment in the skin. This is why the word “Black” in Newspeak should be capitalized – just like in English, it is customary to capitalize the word “Marxist.” According to Newspeak, the black man is a man of the black race, and the Black man with a capital B is a soldier of the revolution, a Marxist with a capital M.


	Capital-B-Black is a black camouflage for Marxism-Leninism.


	In fact, the author of the concept of “white privilege,” former Harvard professor <a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/06/the_russian_origins_of_black_neomarxism.html">Noel Ignatiev</a>, proposed another well-known construct of Newspeak. (Professor Ignatiev was either white or Capital-B-Black, depending on what language is being spoken.) In his school of thought, “racism is a form of anti-communism.” Therefore, all whites, according to the rioters, are, by definition, anti-communists – but only until they kneel before the Capital-B-Blacks.&nbsp;


	Besides, Newspeak eviscerated the entire racist component from the word “racism” and endowed this word with Left-wing political attributes only.


	Newspeak is continually evolving. Recently, an attempt has even been made to redefine <a href="https://freebeacon.com/campus/universitys-anti-bigotry-reading-list-brands-all-conservatives-as-racist/">conservatism as a form of racism</a>. While traditional Marxism used the slogan “Workers of the world, unite!”, modern Marxists in America had to abandon this slogan. By definition, the workers are those who work. However, at the center of the ersatz-revolution of 2020 are those who do not work. American neo-Marxists deserted this unproductive, as it seems to them, idea.&nbsp; They’ve chosen bandits, looters, vandals, lumpens, and nincompoops blinded by leftist ideals as the cannon fodder for the revolution.


	Prominent American philosophers-pillagers of our time use the more appropriate slogan “Ignoramuses of the world, unite!”


	The phrase “Black Lives Matter,” drawn in large yellow letters over the roadway in front of Trump Tower in New York City, has nothing to do with the “racial confrontation between blacks and whites.” This phrase, ordered by the Mayor of New York (stubborn communist Bill de Blasio), is meant to communicate the supremacy of Marxism in front of an embodiment of capitalism (Donald Trump). Like “African-Americans,” “Bill de Blasio” itself is also Newspeak: the real name of the Mayor of New York is <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_de_Blasio">Warren Wilhelm Jr</a>.


	Does Donald Trump understand all the shades and nuances of modern Newspeak? Of course.


	President Trump is aware that America has caught a political infection, and Newspeak is just its outward symptom.


	Trump, in classical English terms, defined the source of the riots in America. The perpetrators are not Russian hackers, Arab terrorists, or some abstract “racists” and “fascists,” but home-grown, radical Left-wing bastards. Trump’s message for American citizens is that the political confrontation today is a confrontation between those who believe that America’s history should be defended and those who would attempt to destroy it.


	In the 2020 election cycle, Democrats with unheard-of perseverance tried to make everyone finally understand that they are an anti-American party. Well, they succeeded. Ask any American about who is robbing, killing, and pillaging – and not a single person in his or her right mind will say that this is the work of the Republicans.


	As a result, neo-Marxists from the Democrat Party brought Donald Trump a political gift on a silver platter. They brought it by themselves – Trump did not ask for it and did not expect it.


	The task of the Leftist forces in the summer of 2020 was to normalize the pogroms. In fairness, it should be noted that the Left has enough experience in various “normalizations.” For example, the normalization of the Jewish pogroms. The normalization of relations with the Communists of Cuba and China. The normalization of the forced assignment of the color red (a historically “evil” color) to the conservatives, and blue for themselves (traditionally, “the good guys” color). They also succeeded in the normalization of the insolent usurpation of the title “liberals,” which historically belonged to the conservative Founding Fathers of the United States since the 18th century. Instead, they ensured that the policies of the Democrats in the minds of American citizens were firmly placed in the column “Anti-Americanism.”


	In addition, the process of Balkanization is rapidly growing inside the mob-inducing Democrat Party – individual factions are already starting to quarrel with each other openly. On the left flank of the political spectrum, as always, there are no changes – it is very crowded over there, as usual. The DNC is finding it increasingly difficult to keep the white militants of Antifa, and the black militants of the Black Lives Matter from shootings, although both of them are capital-B-Blacks in Newspeak – that is, the Marxists.


	Thanks to Newspeak, the word “fascism” has long lost its original meaning. This worn-out epithet was used by Newspeakers so often that, in full accordance with the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law">Goodwin Law</a>, it ceased to carry any purpose. However, in a recent Mt.&nbsp; Rushmore speech, President Trump breathed life into this killed-by-Newspeak term, clearly defining it as “left fascism.” World history, by the way, never experienced “right fascism,” even if the Newspeakers from the Frankfurt School of Socialism have been desperately trying to prove the opposite.


	If the Leftists’ verbal juggling is comprehensible by President Trump, then there are certain doubts that the average American voter is at the same level of intellectual sophistication. The likelihood that American citizens, for the most part, will refuse to delve into the nuances of who blacks are and how they differ from the capital-B-Blacks is very high.


	The consequences for American citizens who just happen to be black are not immediately apparent. However, with a certain degree of confidence, one can make a forecast for the political fate of Leftists after the 2020 elections. To do this, one simply needs to look into the Newspeak dictionary more often to not make a fool of oneself.


	Gary Gindler, Ph.D., is a conservative columnist at&nbsp;<a href="https://garygindler.com/">Gary Gindler Chronicles</a>&nbsp;and the founder of a new science: Politiphysics. Follow him on&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/Gary_US">Twitter</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://social.quodverum.com/@WW_II_Historian">Quodverum</a>.

'Black Lives Matter' and the Camouflage for American Marxism

When you come to another country, the standard recommendation concerning language is to learn a few phrases in advance that you will definitely need. For

Frontpage Mag

gary gindler

American Decadentocracy

What Do Messrs. Marx, Sanders and Blanter Have in Common?

Will America Become China's Vassal?

Ernst Röhm, Maximilian Robespierre, and Democrat Party Stormtroopers

'Black Lives Matter' and the Camouflage for American Marxism

FPM Series

Disloyal Military

Progressive Fascists

Racist Mayors

The Point

AMA Will Use "Equity" to Fight "Anti-Fat" Bias Among Doctors

Biden Admin Allies Contemplated Using National Guard at School Board Meetings

Dave Chappelle Attacker Was Triggered By Him

Biden is Back to Flip-Flopping on Taiwan

A Very Racist Poll About Racism

Events