|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
How many ways could Iran have announced its attack? We were being told beforehand in the media that Iran would attack in the next 36 hours. That’s the opposite of a conventional surprise attack.
And Iran passed on word to Turkey, whose terror regime is one of the backchannels being used by the Biden admin.
Iran informed Turkey in advance of its planned operation against Israel, a Turkish diplomatic source told Reuters on Sunday, adding that Washington had conveyed to Tehran via Ankara that any action it took had to be “within certain limits.”
The Turkish source, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan had spoken to both his US and Iranian counterparts in the past week to discuss the planned Iranian operation, adding Ankara had been made aware of possible developments.
Earlier this week, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken spoke to Fidan to make clear that escalation in the Middle East was not in anyone’s interest.
“Iran informed us in advance of what would happen. Possible developments also came up during the meeting with Blinken, and they (the US) conveyed to Iran through us that this reaction must be within certain limits,” the source said.
And then the ‘Swiss channel’ was used to convey information after the attack.
The United States learned that the Iranian strike on Israel was completed through Swiss channels, a senior administration official said Sunday.
A senior administration official told reporters in a briefing Sunday that the U.S. had a “series of direct communications through the Swiss channel” with Iran leading up to the attack. The official said Iran communicated through the Swiss channel that its strike on Israel was complete as the attacks were ongoing.
“We received a message from the Iranians as this was ongoing, through the Swiss. This was basically suggesting that they were finished after this, but it was still an ongoing attack,” the official told reporters.
Why bother doing all this? It’s coordination. It also means, as I’ve said before, that this is not the real attack. It’s a feint. A light show for publicity purposes. A test of U.S. and Israeli defenses. And a way to assure the Biden administration that its addiction to diplomacy still works.
So Bi Dung will inform Iran if and when Israel decides to respond, such wonderful and trustworthy allies…
But the information will be via the always “dependable and neutral Swiss” and their channels.
That is exactly why Israel isn’t telling Washington what it’s going to do when it goes for Rafah.
Because the obambi misadministration tipped of the Iranians about a proposed Israeli strike on their nuclear weapons program. The Israelis found out from one of their human intelligence sources in Tehran that the mullahs had been tipped off so pulled the plug on the operation.
The Democraps, and Foggy Bottom, haven’t been allies of the Israelis for decades.
The obama administration did that several times. Israel should trust no dems, and few Republicans (sad to say). However, Israel can use dem untrustworthiness to set up the jihadis.
How come depraved psychopathic murderous Iran did not “communicate” the 7 October attack ?
Just an oversight ?
Biden and Blinken think the Ayatollahs are so caring and compassionate.
Biden and Blinken belong in the psychiatric ward of Walter Reed National Military Medical Center.
How do you know they did not?
Its sickening. Biden pretends to support Israel while enabling Israel’s enemies and coordinating with them. Can I get a witness….you bet!
BiDung has done this before since being installed as the puppet – so it is not Briben it’s the puppet masters of the coup d’etat we are in from stolen 2020 election!
Some think it was done for Biden’s campaign. Bizarre how Pelosi & Schumer types suddenly stated support ( wink, wink) for Israel. When Pelosi just called to cut off Israel.
Retaliation then should not be to Iran alone, but to its partners and funders. And best served cold,
Didn’t General Pillbury Doughboy (Milley) inform some Chinese general/diplomat that he would let him know if the US intended to attack China…or something to that effect? When Trump was president. Seems like our whole government/military has gone 100% woke……
It was simply a test to determine the US response.
That, and to test Israeli defenses. Those drones were probably loaded with ELINT packages sending back data, via their satellite uplinks, on radar sites, launch sites, coverage areas, detection ranges, response times, and EW defenses. That way they can tailor the real attack to take advantage of any weaknesses or gaps in coverage detected, and degrade Israeli EW effectiveness.
a feint, yes.
yes, a feint
Iran has been getting away with ALL of it’s terrorist attacks worldwide, so far.
It’s nothing new.
The world can topple Iran’s regime in a matter of weeks. Millions of Iranians will join in gladly too.
The main question to ask is what’s the reason nobody has ever punished Iran for their crimes so far?
There’s been nothing but empty words to condemn Iran. The sanctions don’t work either. Iran simply trades with China, Russa and N Korea. Is that what the free world leaders afraid of?
Absolutely agree! This was not a real attack. It was a stunt for publicity purposes. Yes. Yes. Yes. So for Israel to launch a real attack against Iran would be unwarranted escalation. Yes. Yes. Yes. Thank you, Daniel.
Gaza first, then Iran. Fai presto, Mr. Netanyahu.
Want to end all those terrorists attacks Abolish the #1 source of Terrorist support the United Nations ren move onto Globalists like Soros and his rotten son.
Now they’re so cocky as to try these cute maneuvers in plain sight.
The Iranian attack on Israel through Biden’s VPN?
Plus: Who would trust a ‘Swiss Army Knife’ made in Iran?
If true, the alleged sanction of a limited attack by Blinken would be a scandal of huge proportions.
The WH denies that there was any forewarning, much less coordination. I am not sure what to think.
I wonder if there is anything solid out there to confirm or deny all this.
Reuters? … You don’t believe Reuters? …
… If you can’t trust Reuters, who can you trust?
But Greenfield is in good company …
The New York Times
CNN
The Jerusalem Post
Al Jazeera
The Guardian
and Voice of America
… also ran the unsupported assertions …