Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
If you’re still speculating what new sexual identity, leftists will embrace between men in dresses and the inevitable pedophilia reckoning, Polyamory, or a whole bunch of people living together as a sexual unit, seems like a good bet.
And Berkeley, named after a bishop, is the perfect place for a trial balloon for how to wreck what’s left of the country’s moral code.
Berkeley passed a new law prohibiting discrimination on the basis of relationship and family structure Tuesday, creating some of the first legal protections for people in non-normative relationships.
If you’re living in your very own sex cult, Berkeley has you covered.
The law applies to polyamorous couples and families, as well as single-parent and multi-generational households — anything outside of a monogamous couple and nuclear family structure.
In practice what does that mean? One basic difference between polyamory and other sexual identities is sheer number. Does that mean that if 50 people decide to move into a one-bedroom apartment, it’s okay? If Berkeley is going to treat a bunch of people living together as a protected sexual identity, it’ll do interesting things to zoning laws. Even if laws carve out exceptions, then disparate impact kicks in and the rest is history.
“We see polyamory as one of many stigmatized forms of building relationship and family against the backdrop of a culture that really sets you up to ‘couple,’” said Lily Lamboy, co-founder of Modern Family Institute.
Lamboy is in a polyamorous marriage, lives in an eight-person co-op house in the Berkeley Hills and helps parent the child of a single mother. Through Modern Family Institute, they work on building societal acceptance of a range of relationships and family structures like theirs.
Massive child abuse is obviously the point. This starts with “housing discrimination” and then escalates to family law.
“We know people who have lost custody hearings because their partner outed them in court and the judge ruled against them as an unstable and unsafe parent, because they had a nontraditional relationship structure,” Lamboy’s husband, Alexei Savtchenko, said.
As any qualified family therapist will tell you two years from now after this has become the de factor liberal position, children are healthiest when they’re around a bunch of mentally unstable people abusing each other. That’s why cults produce the healthiest kids.
But if you question any of this, you’re obviously on the ‘wrong side of history’.
Family structures like Lamboy’s are becoming increasingly common. About 5% of people are in consensual non-monogamous relationships, and about 1 in 5 people will engage in such relationships throughout their lifetime.
Increasingly common. The gaslighting should sound familiar. You may never have heard of this, but 1 in 5 people are doing this? Or will be once there are enough shows and TikTok videos promoting this aberrant behavior by a tiny fringe minority with mental and social problems.
“The push by Berkeley and Oakland to formalize polyamorous families is cultural suicide,” Greg Burt, vice president of the California Family Council, said in a statement. “History and experience have shown children thrive best in nuclear father, mother, and child families. A civilization that rejects this biblical model for family life, is hell-bent on its own destruction.”
Well isn’t that the whole point of Berkeley?
Del Varner says
Mormons and Moslems now welcome
Mark Cogley says
Aka Beserkeley.
Algorithmic Analyst says
Psychedelic Berkeley.
Imagine if they had psychedelics during the French Revolution.
Kynarion Hellenis says
Promote, restore and protect traditional sex roles and marriage. Discourage, punish and abolish all forms of disordered “love.” Problem solved.
SPURWING PLOVER says
How else are they going to reduce the Human Population all over the false threat of Over population the legacies of Malthus and Ehrlich
Cat says
Who does the dishes and takes out the trash? Who pays the bills?
I foresee a bunch of freeloaders joining up.
Like most cults, these supposedly new formations will disintegrate in same old way. Favoritism by attractiveness and control and lots of victimization. .
Chris Shugart says
And why not? After all, polyamory worked out fabulously for Charlie Manson and his family.
Domenic Pepe says
So ….. How are the poly “family” finances handled ?