Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Every piece of information that emerges from Biden’s shameful retreat in Afghanistan somehow manages to be worse than the last. This detail comes from a Franklin Foer article in the Atlantic based on interviews with insiders. Foer is the man you call for an establishment whitewash and that’s what this is. But even the information that slips out between the lines reveals some incredible details.
A big part of what made the Kabul evacuation so disastrous is that the Taliban were allowed to take the city.
The Biden administration sent Gen. Frank McKenzie to negotiate with the Taliban as the disaster was underway.
Gen. Frank McKenzie, who would command the botched retreat on the ground, met with the Taliban leadership in Doha. The Taliban leaders had offered to let the United States control Kabul until August 31st. McKenzie reportedly conveyed to the Taliban that they could take over Kabul so long as the U.S. was allowed to use the airport.
He bragged that, “we use the Taliban as a tool to protect us as much as possible.”
There are different versions of what happened at McKenzie’s meeting with the Taliban leader.
The Taliban had offered, ‘Why don’t you just take security for all of Kabul.’ Gen. McKenzie replied, “That was not my instruction”. The Taliban had urged, “We want you to have it,”
That would have required thousands more troops that Biden refused to authorize.
Gen. McKenzie had initially planned to tell the Taliban to stop outside the city, but in the meeting instead told the Islamic terrorism group that he had “no opinion” on them taking the city.
Afterward, General McKenzie, who had made the original dirty deal that put Kabul under Taliban control, praised them as “partners” who had made a “very good effort” to “secure the airport”.
Previously though McKenzie had warned the Taliban not to interfere with rescue operations.
General McKenzie said any attempts by the Taliban to interfere with rescue operations ‘will be met with overwhelming force.’
The Foer version offers a disgraceful synthesis of what happened at the McKenzie meet.
General McKenzie arrived at the Ritz-Carlton in Doha. Well before Ghani’s departure from power, the wizened Marine had scheduled a meeting with an old adversary of the United States, Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar.
Baradar wasn’t just any Taliban leader. He was a co-founder of the group, with Mullah Mohammed Omar. McKenzie had arrived with the intention of delivering a stern warning. He barely had time to tweak his agenda after learning of Ghani’s exit.
McKenzie unfolded a map of Afghanistan translated into Pashto. A circle had been drawn around the center of Kabul—a radius of about 25 kilometers—and he pointed to it. He referred to this area as the “ring of death.” If the Taliban operated within those 25 kilometers, McKenzie said, “we’re going to assume hostile intent, and we’ll strike hard.”
McKenzie tried to bolster his threat with logic. He said he didn’t want to end up in a firefight with the Taliban, and that would be a lot less likely to happen if they weren’t in the city.
Baradar not only understood; he agreed. Known as a daring military tactician, he was also a pragmatist. He wanted to transform his group’s inhospitable image; he hoped that foreign embassies, even the American one, would remain in Kabul. Baradar didn’t want a Taliban government to become a pariah state, starved of foreign assistance that it badly needed.
But the McKenzie plan had an elemental problem: It was too late. Taliban fighters were already operating within the ring of death. Kabul was on the brink of anarchy. Armed criminal gangs were already starting to roam the streets.
Baradar asked the general, “Are you going to take responsibility for the security of Kabul?”
McKenzie replied that his orders were to run an evacuation. Whatever happens to the security situation in Kabul, he told Baradar, don’t mess with the evacuation, or there will be hell to pay. It was an evasive answer. The United States didn’t have the troops or the will to secure Kabul. McKenzie had no choice but to implicitly cede that job to the Taliban.
Baradar walked toward a window. Because he didn’t speak English, he wanted his adviser to confirm his understanding. “Is he saying that he won’t attack us if we go in?” His adviser told him that he had heard correctly.
From a ‘Ring of Death; to “Is he saying that he won’t attack us if we go in?” Even through the lens of Foer’s spin the disgrace comes through.
Gen. McKenzie had started out with the ‘Ring of Death’ bluster that he withdrew when the Taliban leader used the magic words that terrify any bureaucrat pretending to be a general. “Take responsibility.”
McKenzie turned over Kabul to the Taliban because he was making empty threats on reflex that he had no intention of backing up.
Baradar was playing a game. The familiar game that terrorists play of pushing and then claiming that they can’t control their men. McKenzie could have put on a show of force and the Taliban would have backed down. They didn’t actually want to draw the United States into a fight.
But instead, McKenzie backed down. The ‘Ring of Death’ became a slope of appeasement. And Americans were ultimately caught in the ring of death. 13 military personnel and unknown numbers of civilians were killed, many more were stranded behind enemy lines, because McKenzie backed down and let the Talban take the city.
Why did McKenzie do that? As disgraceful a figure as he may be, he was operating on the orders of the Biden administration. And Biden was determined to pull out no matter what. The orders were not to do anything that might delay the scheduled withdrawal. That meant not rescuing Americans or defying the Taliban.
McKenzie had no cards to deal and the Taliban, likely courtesy of their Qatari partners who have bought up half the foreign policy sector in D.C., knew it.
This was where the panicked embassy evacuation and the Americans left behind enemy lines came from.
Mickorn says
“McKenzie could have put on a show of force and the Taliban would have backed down.”
Here’s where you do it. Understood that you are taking Foer’s reporting and his analysis and tweaking it to fit your, whatever you call the garbage you peddle.
But when you try to introduce your “analysis”, all you do is make unprovable pronouncements as if they are irrefutable. Actually, you do not know what the Taliban would have done if US forces had “put on a show of force,” whatever that means (you have no clue what it means). You don’t know. Pretending that you know when you don’t know is not cleverness.
Daniel Greenfield says
It’s not my analysis.
The consensus of material coming from the media, the military and the administration, various accounts, claimed that the Taliban were trying to avoid a fight.
But if McKenzie was unwilling to put on a show of force, he should have never made threats he wasn’t willing to back up.
That’s your side’s foreign policy in a nutshell. Empty talk followed by rapid surrender.
Jeff Bargholz says
Dickworm.
You always defend America’s enemies and attack America.
Just get the fuck out. The vast majority of Americans don’t want America last scum to live here and we want you gone. Why do you cretins choose to live in a country you Hate? NOBODY want to fundamentally change a country they love.
Frank says
Pathetic, are you auditioning for “The View?”
Christopher Robert Riddle says
The”Bomber”was in one of our soldiers”CrossHairs”;He was denied Permission to Take Him Out!!!!!!!!!!!
Algorithmic Analyst says
Should have disobeyed orders.
Jeff Bargholz says
I sure would’ve.
Like when Rob O’Neil shot Bin Loser in the face instead of capturing him for a show trail that would’ve lasted for the duration of the Bareback Hussein Osama regime until Trump got in.
Algorithmic Analyst says
That reminded me. The British Navy was strangled for about a century due to restrictive rules of engagement that obstructed attacks, even in favorable circumstances. Finally a few bold officers, most particularly Horatio Nelson, pushed the limits of the rules and broke them down, just in time to defeat Napoleon.
Kasandra says
Biden is truly the villain of this piece. Not only were our commanders under orders not to do anything that might delay the scheduled withdrawal, but he severely limited the number of troops we could deploy to conduct the withdrawal. The limit was too low for the U.S. to be able to secure the Bagram air base. This meant that the airlift had to be conducted out of the Hamid Karzi airport in Kabul. Having to conduct the airlift out of the center of a heavily populated city, largely in control of the enemy, with too few forces to establish a perimeter some distance from mass of people led to serious problems and, eventually, to American deaths. That is entirely on Biden’s head and he should not be allowed to forget it.
Algorithmic Analyst says
Retreats are complex and difficult operations that hopefully would be well-planned and carried out. This one was thoroughly botched.
Jeff Bargholz says
The Dunkirk retreat was rushed but carried out well.
If idiots can’t make plans, they shouldn’t be in charge.
Algorithmic Analyst says
Yeah, the British were masters of naval withdrawals. I was thinking of Dunkirk, and several other very successful naval withdrawals that the British carried out, that I’ve read some about, that most people don’t know about.
Jeff Bargholz says
Yes, they were good at Naval withdrawals, weren’t they? They didn’t simply flee, they withdrew in an orderly manner whenever possible.
Algorithmic Analyst says
Another example was the withdrawal by sea from Gallipoli during WW1. They expected up to 30,000 casualties during the withdrawal, but there were virtually none. It was a well-planned operation.
Steven says
The Dunkirk retreat cost the British Army all its heavy weapons, not to mention the equipment of 250,000 French and Belgium allies. The retreat was a disaster of incredible portions.
The British evacuation was a “miracle” that should not have occurred except for an incredible mistake on Hitler’s part that cost him the war. The evacuation should never have occurred if the German Army had pressed its attacks against a beaten foe.
Spurwing Plover says
Biden the Blunder how many still support him? They might want to hide away
Jeff Bargholz says
What kind of “work?” Bot porn?
Lucas says
Military leaders who receive orders they know will lead to disaster have a duty to protest and make it known that their orders will result in failure. Our militaria is composed of careerists and has no heroes like Singlaub any more. All knew that over 80 billion in military equipment would fall into the hands of terrorists and the US’s defense posture compromised in a manner not seen since the Demorats sold of South Vietnam.
This was planned and deliberate and orchestrated by Obama. The US will have to deal with this disaster for decades.