Last week at the John Fitzgerald Kennedy Presidential Library, on the 60th anniversary of JFK’s “moonshot” speech, Joe Biden proclaimed, “cancer doesn’t discriminate between red or blue, it doesn’t care if you’re a Republican or a Democrat. Beating cancer is something we can do together and that’s why I’m here today.” Few if any in the audience had any clue that Biden was plagiarizing a Republican.
Way back in 1971, in his State of the Union address, Richard Nixon proclaimed, “the time has come in America when the same kind of concentrated effort that split the atom and took man to the moon should be turned toward conquering this dread disease.” On December 23, 1971, President Nixon signed the National Cancer Act, which gave the National Cancer Institute unique autonomy at the National Institutes of Health, with special budgetary authority. This was the same approach Biden adopted when he was vice president.
In 2015, Joe Biden’s son Beau died of brain cancer, and Biden announced a $1 billion “moonshot” to cure the disease. In 2016, the National Cancer Institute got a budgetary boost, and the NCI advisory board added a 28-member working group. In 2022, Biden once again bloats the bureaucracy.
In March, Biden created the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H). Biden named as director Dr. Renee Wegrzyn, who earned a PhD in applied biology from the Georgia Institute of Technology, but whose bio shows nothing specific about actual cancer research.
As the Biden White House explains, Dr. Wegrzyn worked for two of the institutions that inspired the creation of ARPA-H – the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA) that “will deliver the strategy for the agency’s nascent research portfolio and inaugural budget.”
Under Dr. Wegrzyn’s leadership, “ARPA-H will support programs and projects that undertake challenges ranging from the molecular to the societal, with the potential to transform entire areas of medicine and health in order to prevent, detect, and treat some of the most complex diseases such as Alzheimer’s, diabetes, and cancer, providing benefits for all Americans.” They can be forgiven for harboring more than a reasonable doubt.
The Biden “fact sheet” touts America’s “extraordinary biomedical system that has delivered stunning advances previously seen as inconceivable – from COVID-19 vaccines to drugs that can eliminate certain cancers.” As Americans might recall, repeated application of those same vaccines, plus boosters, failed to prevent the acquisition or transmission of COVID-19. Biden and Dr. Fauci ought to know.
On the other hand, the vaccines proved useful for restricting Americans’ freedoms of movement and association. As Biden charged, COVID-19 was a “pandemic of the unvaccinated.” The “extraordinary biomedical system” also sets up a conflict of interest. Government health officials have an incentive to promote treatments from which they profit and oppose those from which they get no money, whatever their efficacy against disease.
As embattled Americans should know, there’s another back story here. The man Joe Biden jokes is the real president, outgoing medical advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci, has already set back the quest to find a cure for cancer.
Anthony Fauci earned a medical degree in 1966 but if he ever practiced medicine it was only for a short time. In 1968, to avoid duty treating American soldiers, Fauci took a cushy “Yellow Beret” job with the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Dr. Fauci’s bio showed no advanced degrees in biochemistry or molecular biology, but in 1984, the NIH made him head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Kary Mullis, who earned a PhD in biochemistry at UC Berkeley and won a Nobel Prize for the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), believed Fauci did not understand electronic microscopy, did not understand medicine, and therefore, “should not be in a position like he’s in.”
Peter Duesberg, by contrast, earned a PhD in chemistry from the University of Frankfurt in 1963. As Jeanne Lenzer noted in Discover Magazine, the next year Duesberg arrived at UC Berkeley as a postdoctoral fellow “hoping to unlock the secrets of cancer.” At the age of 33, Duesberg was the first scientist to discover a cancer gene (oncogene), which he isolated from a virus.
At 36, Duesberg earned tenure at UC Berkeley, where he served as professor of molecular and cell biology. In 1986, at age 49, Duesberg was elected to the National Academy of Sciences and awarded a National Institutes of Health Outstanding Investigator Award, as Lenzer noted, “one of the most prestigious and coveted grants.” In 1987, Duesberg was a Fogarty Scholar-in-Residence at the NIH laboratory in Bethesda, Maryland.
Professor Duesberg knew that retroviruses don’t kill the host cells they infect, so he was skeptical when Fauci proclaimed HIV to be the cause of AIDS, with no scientific study making the case. In March of 1987, in the journal Cancer Research, Duesberg published “Retroviruses as Carcinogens and Pathogens: Expectations and Reality,” questioning the role of HIV as the cause of AIDS. As Lenzer noted, the man colleagues might once have regarded as the “Einstein of biology” was then smeared as an “AIDS denier.”
For the previous 23 years, Duesberg never had an application for public funding turned down. That funding began to disappear under NIAID boss Fauci, who controlled both AIDS policy and spending on medical research. Fauci also contrived to cancel Duesberg’s media appearances, and tailored policy to please the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power (ACT-UP), whose activists also harassed Duesberg.
Fauci’s prediction that AIDS would ravage the general population was hopelessly wrong but in the best bureaucratic style he remained at the helm of NIAID. Duesberg kept his position at UC Berkeley, but his cancer research took a hit.
His laboratory once boasted two secretaries and jostled with graduate students and postdocs, but by 2008 the only occupants were Duesberg and a single graduate student. Had Dr. Fauci been shown the door, and Duesberg received the funding his research deserved, a cure for cancer might be closer at hand.
In 1996, Duesberg authored Inventing the AIDS Virus, a virtual post-grad course on virology, and a thorough investigation of AIDS controversy. Nobel laureate Luc Montagnier, who discovered HIV, agrees with Duesberg that no scientific study shows HIV to be the sole cause of AIDS. Before he passed away in February, Montagnier endorsed The Real Anthony Fauci, by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
“Tragically for humanity, there are many, many untruths emanating from Dr. Fauci and his minions,” Montagnier wrote. “RFK Jr. exposes the decades of lies.”
Joe Biden, who never had an original idea about anything, claims he wants Americans to beat cancer “together.” Cancer may not care if you are a Republican or Democrat, but Joe Biden certainly does. Check out his September 1, “Battle for the Soul of the Nation” speech, freighted with hatred. For all but the willfully blind, that’s the “real Joe Biden.”
As Biden touts the government’s “extraordinary biomedical system” embattled Americans might pay heed to what Peter Duesberg said about that same system in 1996.
“The modern biomedical research establishment differs radically from any previous scientific program in history,” Duesberg wrote. “Driven by vast infusions of federal and commercial money, it has grown into an enormous and powerful bureaucracy that greatly amplifies its successes and mistakes all the while stifling dissent. Such a process can no longer be called science, which by definition depends on self-correction by internal challenge and debate.”
In government for more than 50 years, Dr. Fauci wields executive-level power without ever facing the voters and now claims to represent science itself. If scientific integrity is to be restored, and deployed in the quest to cure cancer and other deadly diseases, the nation must deinstitutionalize white coat supremacy at first opportunity.
Jello says
The mRNA shots were originally manufactured to prevent cancer. I’m quite sure that Borden’s new cancer cure is simply more killer mRNA shots. The idea was, and I had a friend who worked on them at Merck ages ago, that everyone in the world would get regular shots to stave off cancer. The only problem was, the shots caused cancer. I really would take that shot if I were you.
Redheart says
If we were a Constitutional Republic with Enumerated Powers for the Federal Government and a 10th Amendment to the Constitution, there would be no Constitutional basis for this, the same goes for Senator Lindsey Graham’s plan for the Federal Government to set abortion laws. By the way, didn’t the Supreme Court just return abortion issues back to the States?
CowboyUp says
Biden’s been plagiarizing people since college, at least. The DC bureaucracy needs to be pruned with a chainsaw, and the remainder stripped of its’ ability to make law. Congress should vote on these laws and regulations, not schlep responsibility for them off on unelected officials.
Mo de Profit says
There is no difference between big Pharma and the UN owned WHO, they are intertwined one with the other,
They funded gain of function research in china, they owned the lab where the convid virus emerged, what is the difference between gain of function and spike proteins in the mRNA injections?