|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
What’s a worse “attack on the American system of justice”, challenging your prosecutors or prosecuting your challengers?
I’m echoing Biden’s rhetoric who recently gloated that. “For the first time in American history, a former president that is a convicted felon is now seeking the office of the presidency. But as disturbing as that is, more damaging is the all-out assault Donald Trump is making on the American system of justice.”
I don’t know what “all-out assault” Trump is making here. Unless Biden is using the woke formula of “speech is violence” in which case being critical of the system counts as an all-out assault.
Challenging the system prosecuting you (especially when it’s done for blatantly political reasons as virtually everyone credible has acknowledged) is an American tradition.
Prosecuting your political challengers, as Biden and his political faction are doing to Trump, on the other hand is much more of an “all-out assault on the American system of justice.”
Any system can and should be able to survive some criticism. Its credibility can’t however survive being turned into a hand puppet for political special interests.
And that is what is happening here.
A justice system can survive those who challenge prosecutors, but it can’t survive those who prosecute challengers.
Wake up Americans: “Woke” Democ-rats have a F.I.S.A. warrant with each of our names on it.
No, Daniel, Biden is not “using the woke formula of speech is violence.” He is referring to the fact that Donald Trump refused to accept the result of a free and fair election, attempted by several means to reverse the results of the election, and encouraged his followers to violently opposed the peaceful transfer of presidential power.
That is not “criticizing the system.” That is putting one’s personal ambitions above the system. You know the 2020 election was not rigged (this is why you never claim that it was in you ‘articles’). You must be capable of seeing the difference (most of your regular commenters are not, but that’s just how it is).
you are part of the problem that you cannot and refuse to see and will rue the day when you sided with Joe Briben and his puppet masters and deep state whores who are in the swamp vying to be compromised to be a made man or woman to the deep state’s god
Speaking of the Deep State, it seems that there is a normal tendency for a Deep State to arise from political systems. I see that now when reading history, a pattern that arises over and over.
Yes, ancient Athens, Rome and the Chinese dynasties. We just can’t be rid of these scumbags. The D-Bags are the worst in America.
How can you live with all the dissonance of your false presuppositions? I know it is possible, but it must require a life answering to no one or one which protects your bubble. No one can speak as you do without that kind of cushioned protection.
Free and fair election? Encouraged his followers to violence?
You criticize Greenfield’s capacity / intelligence to “see the difference” as well as his regular commenters. This means you believe you have arrived and wisdom dies with you. You have such hubris! I seldom interact with you but often read people who disagree with me to test my own presuppositions and study against my own ignorance. You never make me study because I can see your false presuppositions. Your writing, unlike Daniel Greenfield’s, does not have the gravitas of coherence and evidence.
You are the Critic and Daniel Greenfield is the Strong Man. He wields a pen much mightier than the sword. You are not ready for him. You must train yourself before you can step into his arena to challenge him and not look the fool. As it is, you embarrass yourself and obviously cannot see it.
” It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.” – Theodore Roosevelt
According to Biden the Blunder no ones above the law yeah sure Biden its just that Biden his Son and their entire cabinet think their above the law and act like it. Somone needs to tell them were not a Monarchy
“it can’t survive those who prosecute challengers.”
That’s a good line, and true to history.