|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
[Want even more content from FPM? Sign up for FPM+ to unlock exclusive series, virtual town-halls with our authors, and more—now for just $3.99/month. Click here to sign up.]
From 2018 and 2024, the politicians and bureaucrats in Washington D.C. arranged for the ‘resettlement’ of 6,299 ‘refugees’ in Maryland. Nearly 1 in 5 of them came from the Islamic terror state of Afghanistan and 1 in 10 came from the equally violent and dangerous terrorist state of Syria. Nearly 70% spoke no English. The second most common language was Arabic.
However in Washington D.C., once part of the state and likely to be part of it again if retrocession reform advocates get their way, only 73 ‘refugees’ were resettled in 6 years.
The Immigration Research Initiative listed an even smaller number in D.C. of 66 in ten years.
There is no information on those lucky 73 or 66.
D.C. is small, but Vermont, which has an even smaller population, had 1,260 ‘refugees’ inflicted on it. 1 in 10 were from Afghanistan. 77% don’t speak English. North Dakota was plagued with over 1,000 ‘refugees’ including the usual assortment of Afghans, Somalis, and Venezuelans.
Even Alaska was saddled with resettling over 400 refugees (the Afghans and Somalis couldn’t make it, only the Ukrainians could apparently handle the bitter Alaskan winter.)
Why doesn’t the capital of refugee resettlement want to take in refugees?
Washington D.C. has been the hub for resettling migrants, some pretending to be ‘refugees’ around the country, yet of the 288,709 ‘refugees’ forced on Americans in big cities and rural towns alike, only 73 were consigned to D.C.
Some people might argue that housing in D.C. is too expensive for everyone except a small elite, but no one was proposing to resettle Afghans and Somalis in Georgetown mansions (not that there wouldn’t be a certain amount of justice to it). Despite being a nexus of wealth for government contractors, lobbyists and the well-connected, 1 in 7 people in D.C. live under the poverty line. And nearly 50,000 people in D.C. already live in subsidized housing.
There is no reason that the ‘refugees’ couldn’t have been placed in D.C. low-income housing the way that they have been all over the country (occupying space meant for America’s poor.)
Nor is D.C. unready to take in the ‘wretched refuse’ yearning to bomb marathons.
Indeed, the D.C. government maintains the usual ‘refugee office’ contracted out, as usual, to Catholic Charities and offers cash assistance and social services. Lutheran Social Services runs an operation there. The Office of Refugee Resettlement claims to have dealt with only 261 ‘refugees’ in D.C. in the last financial year and there’s little sign that they actually stayed.
When you go to the Office of Refugee Resettlement, every state listing links to a collection of local resources. The D.C.directory page mysteriously links only to “Page Not Found.”
Or maybe not so mysteriously after all.
D.C. is the hub for refugee resettlement. This is where the various federal agencies, the refugee organizations, the resettlers, the lobbyists and politicians collude to flood America. But they don’t want that sort of thing where they live and work. It’s fine for a small town in Georgia or Ohio to suddenly have to absorb a few hundred invaders with virulent diseases and agendas, to find interpreters and keep their daughters locked up, but it’s a different matter in D.C.
When 3,000 illegal aliens were dumped in Lockland, Ohio, a village of 3,400, the locals were told to welcome them and keep quiet or be accused of racism. All the while D.C., at 200 times Lockland’s size, was fulfilling its obligation by taking in not thousands or hundreds, but dozens.
The minimal refugee resettlement in D.C. reveals that the people behind the program know that it’s destructive and they don’t want to deal with it in their own homes, cities and communities.
The very people responsible for the retreat from Afghanistan and thenbringing in over 100,000 Afghans to this country did not actually want to live next door to them. And considering the track record of crimes, including murders and stabbings, committed by the Afghans, who can blame them. The trouble is that they want us to live next door to them. And we don’t get a ‘say’ in it.
Refugee resettlement has been a lucrative business and a means of shifting political demographics. That’s why red states in particular were targeted for ‘resettlement’. But like the men who build toxic waste dumps and lunatic asylums somewhere else, they know that the business they’re in is dirty, ugly and dangerous, and they don’t want it close to home.
D.C. and the Vatican both proclaim how important refugee resettlement is, but they don’t actually want to house the refugees. What they do is lecture everyone else about their supreme moral duty of opening their doors to those who want to kill them. Like the celebrity environmentalists who fly jet planes to warn about the terrible environmental impact of traveling by jet, their hypocrisy reveals that they don’t really believe any of what they preach to us.
The D.C. politicians who made a point of visiting murderers, rapists and gang members in ICE detention facilities didn’t actually volunteer to bring any of the ‘poor dears’ home with them. AOC may have cried over an ICE parking lot, but she’s not inviting cartel thugs into her apartment. And the rest of D.C. isn’t interested in sharing the fate of Lockland, Ohio.
Refugee resettlement, like police defunding and cutting back on heating in the winter, is for other people. That’s why Washington D.C. resettled ‘refugees’ in every other possible place.
Even in Alaska. Just not in D.C.
When Dope Francis was so pro migrant I always said he should tear down the walls surrounding the Vatican and invite the invading masses come live with him. They could sell a few art treasures that could feed, cloth and house dozens of “refugees” as well as buy them the latest , greatest snazzy iPhone.
Leading by example is the very best example.
Maybe a tent encampment on the DC. mall?
Better yet, how about the US capitol building and the house and senate buildings?
A shack encampment by the dump.
Well, we know these illegals won’t be dumped in Martha’s Vineyard, Kennebunkport, Chappaqua, Malibu, etc.
They’ll be dumped in red/purple areas. Any concerns of local residents would’ve been dismissed during the B. Hussein/Sleepy Auto-pen administrations.
The citizens in a red community in Idaho voiced outrage over the sudden rise in rapes when Jug-eared Barry dumped all those muslims there. A.G. Loretta Lynch responded with threats of “hate crimes” if they didn’t shut up. (Guess rape isn’t that big a deal. Just ask Bill Clinton.)
Hopefully President Trump will toss ’em out, but he’s talking about amnesty if they pick lettuce.
Shithead McCain taunted Americans to pick lettuce for $50 per hour.
When the cosseted prick said “jobs Americans simply won’t do”, he meant a job HE simply wouldn’t do. (Later on, McCain denied us the same health care he had, because screwing Trump took priority.)
Legal migrants can come farm, then return once finished.
No welfare. No food stamps. No free hotels. No free transportation.
Otherwise, it’s bullshit.
There should be some technical way of distinguishing between signatures made by auto-pen and human made signatures.
There is a way.
That’s how it’s known that the severe majority of signatures are auto-penned.
It also confirms what we’ve known from day one of Grifter Joe’s administration; Biden wasn’t running a damn thing. He was a prop – nothing more.
Also; Thomas Jefferson didn’t use an auto-pen. He used a mechanical device to make a copy of any letter he wrote. He was touchy about slander after he was falsely accused of siring Sally Hemmings’ son Tom. (The DNA test proved Tom WASN’T his son, but the media screwed that one up also.)
Ergo, he used the quill pen – not a button to do it for him.
The auto pen “signatures” are always identical. That’s how you distinguish them.
cvb cvbcbcv cvbcv cvbcbvcvbvb cv
“Nor is D.C. unready to take in the ‘wretched refuse’ yearning to bomb marathons.”
What a great line!
Catholic Charities and Lutheran Social Services are only two denominations among MANY being used by globalists to destroy formerly Christian nations. Their justification relies solely upon twisting the scriptures regarding the Christian duty to love family, brother, nation, sojourner, stranger, and enemy. If you cannot conceive of loving your enemy as you escort him to the place where the sentence of death will be carried out (or Alligator Alcatraz), then you do not understand Christian love. Your thinking is governed by “sloppy agape” and not true Christian love.
This short article is good place to begin to place the duty of Christian love in its proper frame:
https://www.reformedclassicalist.com/home/who-is-the-sojourner
Those arrogant, Pompous old Peacocks cant be bothered with those lower on the roost
Libertards blur the line between real actual refugees and flooding the USA with open borders elements of criminals.
Mommsen said that the worst elements congregated in Rome, and that that was a chronic problem with capitals everywhere.
I was really amused at what D.C. did. The old saying, “Do as I say, not as i do” applies here.. It’s OK for other cities to deal with refugees, illegal aliens, and migrants, but we can’t have that in Washington D.C. I think this is really becoming a big joke to the world. No wonder they laugh at us behind our backs.
City Leaders in the District of Crooks wants protection for themselves but not for the Citizens the typical response from these bunch of Scoundrels