Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
[Want even more content from FPM? Sign up for FPM+ to unlock exclusive series, virtual town-halls with our authors, and more—now for just $3.99/month. Click here to sign up.]
Observers suggest that Israel’s full-scale war against Hezbollah, aimed at neutralizing its leadership and destruction of its missile arsenal, could dismantle the terror group. While Israel’s efforts indeed pose significant setbacks for Hezbollah and represent a critical step in the global fight against terrorism, a crucial factor is often overlooked: Iran’s pivotal role in ensuring Hezbollah’s survival. No matter how severely Israel targets Hezbollah or how much the group is weakened, the Islamic regime in Tehran will relentlessly work to resurrect it. Thus, the key to eradicating Hezbollah may ultimately lie in changing the regime in Tehran.
Supporting Hezbollah (and other terrorist groups in the region such as Hamas and Islamic Jihad) has always been part of the Islamic Republic of Iran’s historical quest to dominate the Middle East and destroy Israel.
When the Islamic regime was founded in 1979, it espoused “the most radical anti-Israeli and anti-Zionist” position in the Muslim Middle East. In a theological innovation, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founder of the new regime, asserted that liberating Jerusalem from the “Little Satan” and its return to Muslim hands was a precondition for completing the Islamist revolution and the return of Mahdi, the Shiite 12th Imam. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Khomeini’s successor, emphasized that achieving this objective requires unwavering support for “Resistance Forces” against the “Zionist Enemy” considering it a fundamental Quranic duty.
The Islamic Republic’s ideological commitment soon transformed into actionable policy. It began calling for the physical annihilation of the state of Israel. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) established the Quds Force (QF) unit to oversee this objective. This specialized unit created proxies in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and later in Yemen and the Gaza Strip to advance the regime goals. The IRGC-QF has built a network of nineteen terrorist organizations on Israel’s borders as part of its “Unity of Fronts” strategy, designed to launch broad-scale attacks on Israel. This highly effective approach has enabled the Islamic Republic to wage a permanent conflict against Israel from multiple fronts and has allowed the regime to gain significant influence throughout the Middle East.
The Islamic Republic provided the proxy network with funding, training, and sophisticated weapons, including precision-guided missiles, rockets, and drones, to target Israeli civilian populations and sensitive sites. This includes precision-guided missiles, rockets, and drones aimed at Israeli civilian populations and sensitive sites. As of September 2024, Hezbollah’s arsenal was estimated to include 200,000 rockets and missiles, such as Fajr-5, Raad-2/Raad-3, Khaibar-1, Zelzal-1, Zelzal-2, Scud-B/C/D, and Fateh-110. Many of these are precision-guided missiles capable of striking deep within Israeli territory.
The IRGC-QF has also supplied drones to Hezbollah and provided training on operating UAVs with ranges between 150 km and 1,700 km, capable of carrying payloads of up to 150 kg. Among these drones are the Mirsad-1 and Mirsad-2, Ababil-2, Ma’arab (suicide drones), Shahed-101 (range of 800 km), Ayoub (equivalent to the Iranian Shahed-129, range of 1,700 km), and Hudhud. Additionally, Iran has provided Hezbollah with drone components and trained its members to operate drones remotely. By mid-2024, Hezbollah had an estimated 2,500 UAVs, according to the Alma Research and Education Center. With this support, Hezbollah launched over 300 drones between October 2023 and July 2024. On June 13, 2024, alone, Hezbollah deployed 30 suicide drones and fired 150 rockets at 15 Israeli positions.
Iran not only supplies Hezbollah with advanced rockets and armed drones but also assists the terror group in establishing its own drone and missile production facilities. This support has enabled the creation of a sophisticated arsenal capable of striking Israeli cities.
There are also reports that Hezbollah has been supplied with electromagnetic pulse (EMP) weapons by the IRGC. An Iranian source disclosed to Kuwait’s Al-Jarida newspaper that the IRGC delivered a shipment of “qualitative weapons” to Hezbollah. Israeli intelligence suggested that the term “qualitative weapons” might refer to chemical weapons. Although Israeli military intelligence has not confirmed the transfer of such weapons to Hezbollah, it is plausible to consider that the regime might supply these weapons to its terror proxies in the future. The IDF discovered a USB flash drive on the body of a Hamas terrorist involved in the October 7, 2023, massacre, which contained instructions for assembling a device to disperse gas, historically used for mass murder in Nazi gas chambers.
Neither Iranian regime officials nor Hezbollah leaders have been shy about publicly acknowledging the regime’s extensive support for Hezbollah. Ayatollah Khamenei has consistently affirmed Iran’s financial and military support for Hezbollah. In a 2012 statement, he declared, “any nation or any group confronts the Zionist regime, we will endorse, and we will help. We have no fear expressing this.” In a 2016 speech, Hezbollah’s eliminated Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah publicly acknowledged Iran’s comprehensive support for the organization, saying “The budget of Hezbollah, its salaries, its expenses, its food, its drink, its weapons, and its missiles come from the Islamic Republic of Iran. As long as Iran has money, we have money… Just as we receive the rockets that we use to threaten Israel, we are receiving our money.”
Iran’s unwavering ideological commitment to Israel’s destruction, coupled with its steadfast support for Hezbollah, Hamas and other terror groups, ensures that no matter how weakened the “Resistance Front” becomes through Israeli decapitation campaigns and bombing raids, the regime will always attempt to rebuild it. For instance, in the 2006 war when Israel launched a massive bombing raid followed by a ground incursion in response to Hezbollah abducting three Israeli soldiers, Hezbollah suffered huge losses in military equipment, and the destruction of its command-and-control system. But it did not take a long time for Iran to rebuild the arsenal into an even stronger, despite Israel’s relentless efforts to prevent such reinforcement.
As the saying goes, to eradicate the tree, you must strike at the root, not the branches. In the same vein, to eliminate Hezbollah, the focus must be on dismantling the regime that created, funds, and arms it.
Farhad Rezaei is a senior fellow at the Philos Project.
RLagrange says
About Iran,the only way to defeat it militarily is using nuclear bombs. The death of millions of civilians.
For the NON-Iranians in the West who are in favor of nuclear war against Iran,that is ok. Those people say they love Iranians but don’t care if millions die due to nuclear bombs.
My impression is that for the vast majority of Iranians in the West that is also ok.
Why would the Globalist Western governments want to start a nuclear war against Iran? Iran is part of BRICS ( 10 members plus 13 partners,not full members). BRICS has defeated the Globalists. The Globalist plan is to have full economic and political control of the world.
Yet if there a nuclear war it would defeat BRICS. There is an Iranian who now lives in Brazil named NIMA ALKHORSHID and whose youtube channel is ”Dialogue Works”.
Each of his videos is watched by tens of thousands,even more.His latest has 100,000 views.He interviewed ALEX KRAINER,anti-Globalist yesterday.Krainer is of the opinion that Trump could be assassinated and that there is the possibility Trump has begun a deception campaign against the Globalists.
By having SEBASTIAN GORKAS ( nominated by Trump as conter-terrorism chief) and others say they will continue to fight Russia,go to war with Iran. So the Globalists will think they are not in danger and let him get to power. Donald Trump and his son Donald Trump Jr have both publicly said that
they believe the Globalists want to start a NUCLEAR war with Russia before he gets into power.To destroy Trump. Here is Nima’s interview:
RLagrange says
Now turning to the cultural landscape,in the West there is a decadence so deep that even science can’t change it.
On the one side there are the Evangelical Christians,100 million in the US,33% of the population, who believed there are NO errors in the Bible.
For ideological reasons, that lead to Cognitive Dissonance.
There are errors. On the other side there are those who are ex-Evangelicals and others who ignore the Shroud of Turin. In the MIDDLE AGES about 40 fake shrouds of Jesus appeared. But that of Turin is not.
In 2011 the scientific center ENEA published a 5 year study.
This study has later been REPLICATED thus verified.
They concluded the front and back images on the Shroud were created by 34 TRILLION watts of ultraviolet radiation. This radiation would have had to come OUT of the body.
34 trillion watts from the top of the body and from the back,both ways.
And it was a FLASH of radiation. It took 1 fortieth of a billion of a second in time.If it had been 1 fortieth of a billion of a second MORE, then the cloth would have been BURNED.
Today with our technology the MOST UV radiation we can create is
only several BILLION watts,not even 1 trillion. Being open minded I can say it is possible ETs did it. Their technology would be that great. Or if not,then a real miracle.
The amount of radiation would be the equivalent of 14,000 LASERS,but we can’t compress 14,000 laser machine into the area of a human body.
Alkflaeda says
Every time I look into an alleged Biblical error, I find that the allegation is groundless – that the original languages provide an explanation of the apparent anomaly. So if you tell me what you’ve found that looks like an error, there could be an answer.
RLagrange says
Hello,
This will be short and long.The short version is read EZEKIEL chapters 26 ,27,28,29.
First,Jerusalem was taken by Nebuchadnezar,king of the Babylonian empire,in 586 BC. He destroyed the Temple of Jerusalem built by Solomon.
So Ezekiel says God himself said Nebuchadnezzar (says his name) will destroy Tyre,conquer it.
There was a 13 year siege ( 586- 573 BC). Tyre was not destroyed. It was on an island.
Then in Ezekiel 29, God himself again says Nebuchanezzar will utterly conquer and destroy EGYPT. The historical records show he invaded it but did not conquer it.
RLagrange says
The longer version about Ezekiel 26,27,28,29 and Tyre and Egypt being conquered and destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar.
Ezekiel 26 says:
” In the eleventh month of the twelfth[a] year, on the first day of the month, the word of the LORD came to me: 2
“Son of man, because Tyre has said of Jerusalem, ‘Aha! The gate to the nations is broken, and its doors have swung open to me; now that she lies in ruins I will prosper,’ 3 therefore this is what the Sovereign Lord says: I am against you, Tyre, and I will bring many nations against you, like the sea casting up its waves. 4 They will destroy the walls of Tyre and pull down her towers;”
(those are the literal words of God according to Ezekiel)
TYRE was a city on an island,plus a mainland part.
In 332 BC ALEXANDER the Great built a RAMP to the walls of Tyre,used BATTERING weapons of war,destroyed the city.
Ezekiel has God saying the same thing,it never happened.
”7 “For this is what the Sovereign Lord says: From the north I am going to bring against Tyre
Nebuchadnezzar[b] king of Babylon, king of kings,
with horses and chariots, with horsemen and a great army. 8 He will ravage your settlements on the mainland with the sword; he will
set up SIEGE works against you, build a RAMP up to your walls and raise his shields against you. 9 He will direct the blows of his battering rams against your walls and DEMOLISH your TOWERS with his weapons. ”
Then in Ezekiel 29 God admits the siege failed and says Egypt will be utterly destroyed,desolate (didn’t happen)and Nebuchadnezzar would conquer EGYPT.
It didn’t happen.
Ezekiel 29: ”17 In the twenty-seventh year, in the first month on the first day, the word of the Lord came to me:
18 “Son of man, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon drove his army in a hard campaign against Tyre; every head was rubbed bare and every shoulder made raw.
Yet he and his army got NO REWARD from the campaign he led against TYRE.
19 Therefore this is what the Sovereign Lord says: I am going to give Egypt to Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, and he will carry off its wealth. He will loot and plunder the land as pay for his army. 20 I have given him Egypt as a reward for his efforts because he and his army did it for me, declares the Sovereign Lord.””
RLagrange says
About the Shroud of Turin and John.
Scholars on it believe there is an indirect reference to it in John.
We can see the negative image of a man’s body. So that is what John saw,we have:
John 20:6-8:
”Simon Peter arrived just after him. He entered the tomb and saw the linen cloths lying there. 7The cloth that had been around Jesus’ head was rolled up, lying separate from the linen cloths.
8Then the OTHER DISCIPLE, who had reached the tomb first, also went in.
And he SAW and BELIEVED.”
He would have seen the negative image of a human body on the cloth. That was what made him believe in a miracle,a resurrection.
What happened before was this:
John 20:1-5. Notice NONE of them have been told of any resurrection,
”Early on the first day of the week,a while it was still dark, Mary Magdalene went to the tomb and saw that the stone had been removed from the entrance. So she came running to Simon Peter and the other disciple, the one whom Jesus loved. “They have TAKEN the Lord OUT of the tomb,” she said, “and we do not know where they have put Him!”
Then Peter and the other disciple set out for the tomb. The two were running together, but the other disciple outran Peter and reached the tomb first. 5He bent down and looked in at the linen cloths lying there, but he did not go in.”
Why was the image not mentioned?
1. According to Jewish law it was considered IMPURE to have a cloth that had touched a DEAD body and had BLOOD.
2. The cloth had the IMAGE of a MAN,that was idolatry according to Mosaic law.
3. However by WHO was the image created,by an ordinary man, or by the Messiah and even by God. Since it was by God then it was not idolatry nor impure.
4. Keep it as a reminder of a miracle, but as a secret,or else it could be destroyed by the enemies of Jesus. So no mention of an image.
Notice it mentions linen CLOTHS,plural.There would be the linen shroud of Turin and two linen strips tying the HANDS and FEET due to RIGOR MORTIS and a third around the
head to keep the MOUTH closed,not be wide open,due to rigor mortis.
Also we have John 11:43-45 ( Lazarus incident,resurrected)
”After Jesus had said this, He called out in a loud voice, “Lazarus, come out!”
The man who had been DEAD came out with his HANDS and FEET BOUND in STRIPS of LINEN (due to Rigor Mortis,my note), and his face wrapped in a cloth.”
“Unwrap him and let him go,” Jesus told them.”
RLagrange says
1st Part
To show I am not closed to all possibilities I will show why it can be argued Jesus was NOT a failed apocalyptic prophet. It will be in 3 or 4 parts and refer to:
1. The CONDITION Jesus gave the people of JERUSALEM 1 week before he died as to when he would return(Second Coming). And he also states that if they do not accept him then
the Temple of Jerusalem would be made desolate. It is in Q written around 50 AD, 20 years before the destruction of the temple in 70 AD.
Q is a collection of 50 sayings of Jesus that appear in both Luke and Matthew but not in Mark.
2.Then why I believe Mark,Luke and Matthew were all written at the MOST by 62 AD.It is based on the non-mention of the death of JAMES,brother of Jesus in Jerusalem. He was the leader of the Christians there and one of the 3 leaders of the church ( with Paul and Peter).
3. Then seeing Mark,Luke and Matthew all have Jesus predicting the literal destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem one day before his death (Olivet Discourse). Jesus said not one stone would remain,he is asked WHEN.
He says THIS GENERATION and in the Bible a generation is 40 years,Jesus died in 30 AD or 33 AD. The 40 year period for when the destruction of the Temple would be is 30+40=70 AD or 33+40=73 AD.
Matthew 24:1 – 25:46. Parallel passages are found in Mark 13:1-37 and Luke 21:5-36.
4. Then the 40 years appear again in reference to the destruction of the Temple in both the Babylonian TALMUD and Jerusalem Talmud.
5. Then in 362 AD Emperor Julian,ex-Christian ,tried to prove Jesus a false prophet.
He gave the Jews permission to rebuild the Temple of Jerusalem so the ”not a stone will remain” would be proven false.
And all say BALLS of FIRE prevented it. We have 6 writers, 3 were contemporaries ( 1 was pagan) and all the others were Arians or Trinitarian Christians. The other 3 lived only one generation after the event. Read:
https://fisheaters.com/juliantemple.html
RLagrange says
2nd part
About Jesus in Q
In Luke 19:28-40, Matthew 21:1-11, Mark 11:1-11 and John 12:12-19
Jesus enters Jerusalem on a DONKEY and the JERUSALEM crowd shouts ”Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord”.
They accept him as the Messiah,Jesus on a donkey is about the ZECHARIAH 9:9 prophecy referring to the Messiah:
”Rejoice greatly, Daughter Zion! Shout, Daughter JERUSALEM!
See, your KING comes to you, righteous and victorious, lowly and riding on a DONKEY, on a colt, the foal of a donkey.”
Jesus enters and teaches for a week,later in the week he says what is found in Q (50 AD ) in Matthew 23:37-39 and Luke 13:34-35.
”O Jerusalem, Jerusalem,
who KILLS the prophets and stones those sent to her, how often I have longed to gather your children together as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were unwilling!
Look, your house is left to you desolate. (Temple of Jerusalem to be made desolate,my note)
And I tell you that you will NOT see
me AGAIN (Second coming) until you say, ‘Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord.’”
The ”Blessed is he who comes…” is from Psalm 118:26 and before in the same psalm it has ”The stone that the builders REJECTED has now become the cornerstone.”
Jesus had in that week told the pharisees about it in Matthew 21:42, Mark 12:10-11 and Luke 20:17
”Jesus said to them, “Have you never read in the Scriptures: ‘The stone the builders rejected has become the cornerstone. This is from the Lord, and it is marvelous in our eyes’?”
Essentially Jesus said that he would come back again in the second coming only if the people of Jerusalem accepted him again as Messiah after his death
and that as proof he was the Messiah he was saying the Temple of Jerusalem would be destroyed.
RLagrange says
3rd part
The Temple of Jerusalem was destroyed by the Romans in 70 AD.Most scholars believe Mark was written around 75 AD,Matthew and Luke around 85 AD and John around 90AD.
However Luke and Acts are ONE BOOK, in 2 parts.Acts ends with Paul in prison in Rome,still alive. We know Paul and Peter were killed by Nero in 64 AD. Why didn’t Luke in Acts,history of the early church, mention it if Acts was written 20 years later?
Mention it as proof that Peter and Paul were heroes of the faith?
Scholars say that it was because Luke was AFRAID of offending the Roman emperor and state. Because it was a Roman emperor who killed Peter and Paul. I used to be convinced by it but then I remembered:
1. Acts mentions the death of STEPHEN for the faith,killed by who? By the Jews,non-Romans.
2. Acts mentions the death of JAMES, brother of John the apostle in Acts 12:2.By who? By Romans, no,by the Jewish king then.
3. Acts mentions the STONING of PAUL,who was left for DEAD,but survived in Acts 14:19.By who?By Romans,no, by Jews.
We know JAMES,brother of Jesus,leader of the Jerusalem Christians was killed the Jewish leaders there in 62 AD. It appears a book JOSEPHUS,Jewish historian of the time.
Why,if Acts was written in 85 AD,does Luke NOT mention it if the one who killed James were Jews and not Romans? Unless Acts was written before
62 AD or finished in the year 62 AD but news of the death of James had still not reached Luke.
RLagrange says
4th part
Having argued Mark,Luke and Matthew were written before 70 AD,then they have a real prediction before the event by Jesus. Jesus says the Olivet Discourse,one day before his arrest and in Matthew 24:1-3 ( also Mark 13:1-3, Luke 21:5-7)
says:”As Jesus left the TEMPLE and was walking away, His disciples came up to Him to point out its buildings.
2“Do you see all these things?” He replied. “Truly I tell you, NOT ONE STONE here will be left on another; every one will be thrown down.”
3While Jesus was sitting on the Mount of Olives, the DISCIPLES came to Him privately. “Tell us,” they said, “WHEN will these things happen, and what will be the sign of YOUR COMING and of the end of the age?””
And later,”Truly I tell you,THIS GENERATION will not pass away until all these things have happened.”
I believe this generation was in reference to that of the apostles (Peter,James,later Paul,also contemporary of Jesus). A Biblical generation is 40 years. We know Peter and Paul lived until 64 AD and they were killed. John presumably lived longer.
Before in Q Jesus made his Second Coming conditional on Jerusalem accepting him again.
So he probably meant he gave Jerusalem a time period of 40 years after his death to repent.Those 40 years also included the life span of the disciples. Within 40 years or at most at a maximum of 40 years after his death
the destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem, as proof.
Here either there was an authentic prediction or Jesus made a lucky guess.
RLagrange says
Lastly what appears in the 2 Jewish Talmuds,the Babylonian and the Jerusalem. The information was written down hundreds of years after 70 AD so who knows how accurate they are.
One thing is sure it is NOT Christian propaganda.It was written by the Jews.
YOM KIPPUR is the Day of Atonement,the holiest day,and the High Priest would ask God to give the Jewish people for that year.
Both Talmuds mention a procedure done to know if the forgiveness had been given,or if the sins were not pardoned. They both mention that for FORTY YEARS prior to 70 AD God did not accept the sacrifices for sins on Yom Kippur.We have:
The earlier collection is known as the Jerusalem Talmud and the later collection, compiled between the 3rd and 5th centuries AD, is known as the Babylonian Talmud. Both of them have fascinating things to say about the 40 year period between Jesus’ ascension and the temple’s destruction in 70 AD:
Jerusalem Talmud:
“Forty years before the destruction of the Temple,
the western light went out,
the CRIMSON THREAD remained crimson, and the
LOT for the Lord ALWAYS came up in the left hand.
They would close the gates of the Temple by night and get up in the morning and find them wide open” (Jacob Neusner, The Yerushalmi, p.156-157).
If the Crimson turned WHITE and the lot came up on the right hand instead it mean that yes,God had pardoned the sins on Yom Kipper.
They even thought the lack of light meant God had said no.Since it says ”always” it is thought the text means for a
40 year period,not just one year.
Babylonian Talmud:
“Our rabbis taught: During the LAST forty years before the destruction of the Temple
the lot ‘For the Lord’ did NOT come up in the right hand;
NOR did the crimson-colored strap become white;
nor did the western most light shine; and the doors of the Hekel [Temple] would open by themselves” (Soncino version, Yoma 39b).
The Crimson Thread
There was a Jewish tradition tied to the Day of Atonement, when a scapegoat bearing the sins of the people would be released into the wilderness (see Leviticus 16).
According to the Babylonian Talmud, though, the scapegoat would wear a crimson (red)-colored strap, and it would become white once it reached the wilderness, indicating that God had forgiven their sins:
RLagrange says
I should have added this also,John is said to have been written 90 to 95 AD.However if Acts was written in 62 then John was written in 72 AD.
John actually talks about the martyrdom of Peter (happened in 64 AD) in John 21:18-19 ,””Very truly I tell you, when you were younger you dressed yourself and went where you wanted;
but when you are OLD you will STRETCH OUT your HANDS (crucifixion?)and someone else will dress you and lead you where you do NOT want to go.”
Jesus said this to indicate the kind of death by which Peter would GLORIFY GOD.”
Only in John does it say Jesus’ side was pierced .It appears in the Shroud of Turin.
Only in John does it says Jesus’ legs were NOT broken,a common Roman practice at crucifixion. The Shroud shows no signs of broken legs.
Only in John does it says when the side was pierced that water (in reality SERUM,transparent) and blood came out. The shroud shows serum on it,as well as blood.
It says the author was there at the crucifixion,an eyewitness in John 19:33-35:
”But when they came to Jesus and found that he was already dead, they did NOT break his legs.
34 Instead, one of the soldiers PIERCED Jesus’ side with a spear, bringing a sudden flow of BLOOD and WARER.
35 The man who SAW IT has given testimony, and his testimony is true. He knows that he tells the truth, and he testifies so that you also may believe.”
John was written by 2 authors,we know since it has 2 conclusions.The last chapter is believed to have been written by a disciple of the author of the first 20 chapters. First one is John 20:30:
”Now Jesus performed many other signs in the presence of his disciples that are NOT recorded in this work. 31 But those written here have been recorded so that you may come to believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that through your belief you may have life in his name.”
Second conclusion,in John 21:24:
” This is the disciple who testifies to these things and has WRITTEN them, and we know that his testimony is true.
( in reference to the author of the first 20 chapters)
25 But there are also many other things that Jesus did; and if every one of them was recorded,
I do not think the world itself could contain the books that would be written.”
skam says
“About Iran,the only way to defeat it militarily is using nuclear bombs. The death of millions of civilians.”
It would end with just one nuclear bomb on Tehran and maybe a second over Masshad,and the resulting death of hundreds of thousands….just like the US did over Hiroshima and Nagasaki which ended the Japan war.
Rob A says
Actually, a neutron weapon would be more efficient and far less destructive than a fission weapon. Neutron radiation dissociates organic matter, not infrastructure. And neutron radiation penetrates fairly deeply underground so there’s no hiding underground from it’s effects.
Think of a neutron weapon as an efficient way to instantly depopulate an entire area.
Wesley says
Israel has a problem. . .a problem that is years old, and persists. I would hate to see the confilct go nuclear, but if it does, there is little the rest of the world can do about it.
In the meantime, Israel should launch a very dirty war of attrition against the leaders of IRAN. . kidnap, kill, whatever they need to do, to whomever they need to do it to. . Bomb whatever they need to. I suspect that it would not take that much to topple the Iranian regime, and they have deserved payback since ’79 when they took the American Embassy hostages.
The United States can sink their Navy, and reign down indiscriminate fire with drones. . Isreal controlled their entire airspace and were merciful. Perhaps the next time the Iranians will realize the 40 and 50 year old Soviet junk just will not keep them safe.
Let IRAN feel the terror they so love as a result of their religion.
Intrepid says
Note to Hez-Balless-La
Your yellow flag looks a little frayed. And painting your faces with green, red and black face paint will not win you any battles,
Here’s an idea. How about surrendering, unless you really like getting your asses kicked, every 6 months.
Gabrielle says
One need not start a nuclear war but annihilating their ability to engage in usage of or the sending of any form of weaponry to their multiple proxy terrorist groups would certainly seem strategic in nullifying Iran until Inauguration Day in the USA.
Then, permanent means of strangling the Persian empire should be reinstituted, sorely crippling their economy. If Biden had not eliminated the sanctions, Iran would be on the verge of total economic collapse by now. Such impoverishment of the nation might well give rise to a revolution by the people, most of whom want this dictatorship obliterated. Israel, quite simply wants to thrive and continue living in our eternal homeland with good relations with others.
Once brought to their economic knees, then strategic bombing of pivotal weapons, nuclear, and other areas should be stealthily completed leaving them essentially neutered and unable to threaten any of their Middle Eastern neighbors. Trump and his team can effectively address both Russia and China as well as North Korea to interrupt any such supplies of weapons being sent to Iran through any of them in order to keep the Ayatollah in check. Then it’s the people of Iran who must REVOLT against the chains on them and destroy this theocratical, communist dictatorship posing as religious leadership.
Spurwing Plover says
One way to end Hezbollah is to cut off their support like the United Nations Soros
Rob A says
That’s the equivalent of stepping on the cockroaches you see. The problem is with the cowardly cockroaches you don’t see who hide behind women and children and the wussified western nations. Ergo, cutting off their support doesn’t go far enough and ultimately end up being an exercise in futility.
The only way to get rid of human cockroaches is via mass extermination done expeditiously.. Of course, there will be collateral damage but that’s a small price to pay for getting rid of a much larger and persistent problem. Plus, by eliminating the “breeders”, there won’t be a new generation of Hamas or Hezbollah cockroaches..
Angel Jacob says
Killing Nasrallah was a good start.
The mullahs are the root cause of all terrorism.