|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Earlier today I wrote about the judicial coup. It wasn’t surprising that Dems and leftist activists would turn to their pet federal judges to block assorted Trump administration policies. But what is startling is the level of micromanagement from the judicial coup.
We’re not dealing with federal judges blocking a Muslim travel ban or a border wall, but mandating that the FDA and HHS have to push transgenderism.
That’s the actual ruling of Judge John Bates who commanded the FDA, CDC and HHS to display materials promoting the fictional concepts of transgenderism.
The absurd lawsuit by a leftist medical group, which claimed that doctors needed transgender materials on the HHS site in order to be able to treat their patients, was topped by an more absurd ruling, claiming that, “everyday Americans, and most acutely, underprivileged Americans, seeking healthcare,” will be harmed because doctors will be unable to “provide these individuals the care they need (and deserve) within the scheduled and often limited time frame, there is a chance that some individuals will not receive treatment, including for severe, life-threatening conditions. The public thus has a strong interest in avoiding these serious injuries to the public health.”
The activist group and the judge argue that “DFA’s arbitrary and capricious argument is simple: the agencies’ removal decisions were
“completely unreasoned” and thus were not the product of reasoned decisionmaking.” That being any decision they disagree with.
The legal reach here ought to sprain an entire judiciary.
Doctors claim that because they use government websites, they won’t be able to possibly treat their patients unless those websites push their favored transgender ideology, which somehow translates into a mandate that the websites push that ideology.
Stripped of the pretense, a federal judge is contending that he can control the content of federal websites.
We’ve reached the very limit of this judicial coup and petty tyranny in which when Dems are in office, everything has to push transvestites and when they’re out of office, their judges insist that it’s in the public interest to force every part of the government to push transvestites.
Judge Bates has invented a statutory right to having government websites push his ideology. If this kind of thing stands, there will be no limit. This is the kind of decision that if it is not defied, will essentially eliminate the executive branch and the constitutional checks and balances.
If the White House doesn’t even have the right to control its websites, what can it control?
Excellent observation,
but allow me the counter-factual hypothetical …
If a conservative group demanded access to previously available public data
such as IRS records for treatment of conservative 503c’s
or FBI records involving terrorist attacks or assassination attempts or ‘erections’
or CDC’s records concerning mitigation measures for respiratory viruses
or any election offices’ statutorily required election data for an audit of their ‘recount’
or I could go on and on and on …
They would have NO STANDING.
In fact, can anyone think of a time when a pro-American activist/NGO/individual or class/agency/City or State
was determined to have STANDING in any such case?
Yet all of these Lefties have standing according to politically motivated judges.
We the People have NO rights and ONLY responsibilities …
Every communist / fascist / non – American / criminal / gov’t employee … has ONLY Rights and NO responsibilities.
You CANNOT work within a completely corrupt system and fix that system !
Only We the People can take back OUR country and set things right !
THIS is what the 2A is for !!!!!
Posse comitatis …
LETS ROLL !!!!
Dear Judge, nothing in the law permits you to make the ruling you published, so we will give it all the respect and adherence it merits.
I love President Trump but he reiterated today for the umpteenth time that he would continue to appeal illegal and politically motivated rulings by judges who are Dirtbagocrat operatives which the D-Bags “judge shopped” to get their way, which is to oppose law and the will of the people. As competent as President Trump is, his approach to D-Bag activist judges and the “judicial coup” is bend over stupid.
Sure, use the appeal process to EVENTUALLY overturn illegal rulings which cause untold harm to America in the interim, but use that time to ignore the illegal orders, especially this one, which prevents the White House from controlling its own websites. It’s ludicrous and he needs to go Andy Jackson on these criminal Dirtbagocrat scum in the interim.
And did I mention that everything this criminal judge wrote about the health of trannies and wannabe trannies is a bald faced lie? And that lower courts don’t have the legal authority to overturn federal policies and laws?
Wake up, Trump!
Another Imperialists Judge imposing the will of the UN/CFR/Globalists upon us which is more reasons to have them removed from the Bench especially the ones Obama appointed
If Trump doesn’t have the balls to defy the quote “Federal Judges” then,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ?????????????????? What are we doing?
Trump should ignore the judiciary on this issue, if the websites are within the Executive branch.
The Left wants to eradicate God and turn human society into a forest of wild beasts.
Yes, those morons think humanity has all the answers. More has been written about the folly of that conceit than the two of us together could ever read between us.
Law Courts and Judges have arrogated way too much power to themselves over the years.
They gone from applying the law to interpreting the law anyway they want to making up new law when they feel like it.
Often in direct opposition to the Legislative Branch and its intentions.
Any Judge that does that should be summarily stripped of their position. The only Justices that have any legitimacy in interpreting law in opposition to the Legislative Branch should be the Supremes, and all they should be able to do it go “that’s a bad law, go away and rewrite so it isn’t”.
“The only Justices that have any legitimacy in interpreting law in opposition to the Legislative Branch should be the Supremes, and all they should be able to do it go ‘that’s a bad law, go away and rewrite so it isn’t.'”
That is the law but Criminal Dirtbagocrat operatives judges ignore it. Lower courts don’t have the legal authority to challenge federal policies and laws, much less rule against them or overturn them.
Is there any reason he cannot add to these website materials? that they are placed there by a ruling and also add references and other materials that may refute transgenderism, for example.
It would be very helpful to those DE TRANSITIONING who have rights and require doctors to read about their treatment. These people need to sue the fed gov, btw, for their needed care and rights to be represented in same way.
Or shut the website in the interim.