|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Choosing to go on SNL instead of on Rogan’s show was about more than personal preferences.
Going on Rogan would have exposed Kamala to an audience of voters she doesn’t have yet. Going on SNL gives her clapter from an audience already voting for her.
In her home stretch, Kamala keeps picking friendly audiences over persuadable ones. It’s part of a campaign gamble that bets on turning out the base over any other group.
In the third pivot of her fairly brief campaign, Kamala jettisoned efforts to talk to anyone on the outside and instead the campaign was rebuilt around turning out as many pro-abortion female voters as possible.
Going on Rogan doesn’t serve that agenda, but going on SNL does.
The ultimate test of any campaign strategy is whether it pays off on Election Day. Making it officially a gender election is a strategy, but it’s one that Kamala is much more comfortable because it doesn’t take her out of her comfort zone. The initial experiments have boiled down to the familiar campaign strategy of attacking Trump as the next Hitler and rallying women voters to save abortion.
It’s not original or exciting, but neither is SNL.
‘The Truth About Kamala’ is a serious look by the Freedom Center Investigates project at Kamala, her past, her origins, and her associates.
It’s the story of who she really is, what she’s done, and what she stands for.
If ever there was a player not ready for prime time-ala …….
Of the two actresses, Mayala played the adult prompting the child, holding her hentala.
It’s just too special…..
Abortion is number 4 on the list of most important issues for voters. The media downplays it, but there are a very large number of pro-life women in this contingent. If they vote Trump will win. If they will only vote for a candidate that promises a national abortion ban, then they are, in fact, perpetuating the unmitigated slaughter they claim to be against.
Maybe Trump should promote the pro-life issue if he thinks he needs the vote of pro-life women.
A Harris administration will be a disaster, but abortion will be promoted with or without Trump and Trump will not be able to limit abortion thanks to the selective legal system controlling the issue.
Trump’s campaign has wasted its support with the pro-life community to obtain or suppress non-existent votes from pro-choice women. These “votes” are no more real than the movie Avatar’s “Unobtainium” element.
With planning like this: We should not expect much more from a Trump administration than we got in 2016.
To be clear: Everyone in my family has already voted for Trump.
Yes, abortion is a non-issue…….to the baby killers. It’s only real to pro-lifers.
I respectfully disagree Dan. Trump didn’t need to. Dems promoted the pro-life issue for free by attacking Trump on his results there. There ARE a lot of passionately pro-life women out here. Their scientific and moral arguments, and in some cases example, changed my mind on it, by my early 20s. The pro-life women and men I know voted, and the choice was clear.
But one of the pro-abortion women I know voted for the first time, at 32, for Trump on the first day of early voting. That’s who Trump needed to convince to vote, and apparently, he did. She’s concerned about the economy, crime, and her ability to make an honest living (which the dems’ over-regulation and taxation constantly interferes with). The founder of my company, who’s as apolitical as they get, who voted once in his life and wasn’t planning to this year, went and voted for Trump yesterday, Both of them also mentioned they were really impressed with JD Vance, which bodes well for the future.
Correct. I’m pro-life. However, I’m not a zealot – I believe that it should be decided by states and like clinton said years ago (but didn’t really mean it) it should be safe, legal and rare. I think many prolifers are like me: we don’t want UNFETTERED abortion, we believe in limits and educating the public about the barbaric procedure really is, and show all women and girls who want to end their child’s life, an ultrasound of that sacred, unique human life inside her. The abortion industry is a huge money maker, and they fight hard to keep the slaughter going strong.
Abort women, not babies.
I’m pretty sure “abortion” is about #39 on the list of non-issues.
Nobody is going to change their mind about it in the next two days.
There’s plenty of time to count fake D-Bag ballots afterwards, though. Just like the last two times.
SNL retooled a 2015 skit with Donald Trump and the make up mirror to put a happy face on a harpy this Saturday. Just about as original as the rest of this sad show’s content.
That show is still on the air? People watch more food channels and old, black and white, cowboy channels. Hopalong Cassidy is more popular, and I don’t even know who that guy is.
I have news for the three or four losers out there who actually watch Saturday Night Dead. John Belushi died a long time ago and so did your show.
Kamala and snl weren’t even original. Snl already did a similar skit on Trump. Kamala’s keeping to her safe spaces, cause she crashes and burns everywhere else. She’s got all these celebutard friends of pdiddy endorsing her. Anybody that knows what’s going on there, knows why.
PP Diddler? Didn’t he diddle a bunch of under-aged prostitutes? Yeah. Kiddie porn is about the speed of Dirtbagocrats.
Meanwhile, at Kamala’s Friday night rally in Milwaukee, the crowd was entertained by a (bl*ck) female singer whose name I don’t dare mention because of its r*cist overtones. The performance was characterized by scantily clad lewd gyrations and postures along with an unending stream of obscenities.
The MSM’s reaction? Total silence. This is the same MSM who were appalled – appalled! – by the alleged “vulgarity” and “racism” at Trump’s Madison Square Garden rally. (The “racism” consisted of a joke about Puerto Rico’s (real) garbage problem, and the “vulgarity” was probably Trump’s use of the word “bull****”.) But the out-and-out trash at Harris’s rally gets a complete pass.
Harris-Walz will win or lose based on selection fraud.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is a fool.
The only reason for playing along with the “we just need 1-2%” game we’ve played for the last 64 years is …
To get the losers off the couch in the hopes of overwhelming the KKKrats election stealing machine.
Much is made about winning selections – based upon one-offs and surprises – or based upon elections in smaller communities outside the KKKrats’ “base” of operations.
To win: We have to have election integrity in 50-60 key counties. The other 3500+ counties do not matter. Most key counties are already lost: They post results that are impossible if not improbable, and they exist in a legal stew where no one resist without fear of prison. See Tina Peters (and support her legal effort).
At this point we can only hope G-d blesses the heroes working on election integrity since 2020, and thwarts the KKKrats efforts to steal this election.
Regardless: If Trump does not take office, we’re done. Because of demographics. 64 years of bleeping America by KKKrats has left us with very few people who even know what it’s supposed to look like. And we now have 20+MM invaders to support the KKKrats.
If Trump takes office, the fight will go on. But all too many of us will go back to sleep. And to be fair. Many of us will be going to sleep full-time – as we age out of the game of life.
Clear violation of 47 United States Code sec. 315. SNL isn’t A bona fide news or interview show and it wasn’t a debate. Thus, her appearance violated the equal time provisions of that section as NBC did not offer Trump equal time. There are criminal penalties for violating the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. But Comcast/NBC/Universal couldn’t care less. After all, it was all in aid of the Democrats and it’s not like we have a two tier justice system or anything. Oh, and for whatever it’s worth, I practiced communications law for 40 years so I think my opinion here might have some validity.
This looks to me like Kam’s version of Trump’s stunt at McDonald’s. It’s her attempt at being a regular guy. While Trump hangs out with ordinary working peop[e, she hangs out with show-biz glitterati. Actually what it illustrates is the stark difference between what each candidate considers important. Plus it plays to Kam’s vanity. Who actually has the big ego here?
Well, she is a bit of a joke, so there’s that.
Then she laughs all the time as if someone had actually told a joke, even though there was none. Maybe SNL was trying her out for the laugh track?
I never watch SNL and I never will way too liberal and typical leftists stuff