Since the election of Donald Trump to be America’s next President, large groups of protestors and rioters have fanned out around the United States, smashing windows, damaging property and physically attacking other people to express their anger of Trump’s victory.
Their conduct in the aftermath of the election of a president is unprecedented but, given the riots launched by “Black Lives Matter” not a huge surprise.
The central theme of the anti-Trump demonstrators is to equate his calls for border security and effective immigration law enforcement with racism and bigotry.
Undoubtedly some of the demonstrators, particularly the non-violent demonstrators, are truly concerned about racism. However, they are grossly misinformed and are tragically being exploited and manipulated by the globalists and immigration anarchists, having been convinced by the decades of lies told about immigration by our politicians and pundits.
Our immigration laws as we will see, have absolutely nothing to do with xenophobia or racism.
During the first Republican presidential debate Fox News correspondent Bret Baier opened the debate by asking all of the Republican candidates on stage to raise their hand if they would not support any Republican candidate who would win the primaries and possibly run as a third party candidate.
Trump was the only candidate on stage to raise his hand. Trump’s reaction was reported on by news media across the country, typical of those reports was “Trump tells Republicans in 2016 debate he may not support GOP nominee.”
None of the reporters thought, however, to ask the Democratic candidates if they would support the Constitution of the United States if a Republican won the general election. Perhaps those reporters should have.
For decades, politicians from both political parties have acceded to the demands of the globalists who see in our nation’s borders impediments to great wealth for the elite to be derived by driving down wages and working conditions for Americans by making them compete with Third World workers who bring with them Third World expectations of wages and working conditions.
Organizations such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have, though massive campaign contributions, pushed the United States to increase the number of countries enrolled in our Visa Waiver Program even though this removes a vital layer of security that the 9⁄11 Commission reported was essential to national security.
The Chamber of Commerce is one of the most Anti-American organizations. It is hell-bent on flooding America with cheap foreign labor for all industries including high tech industries. The Chamber of Commerce is also eager to flood America with unlimited numbers of foreign tourists and foreign students and have found (bought) allies in both political parties.
The Democratic Party, however, is additionally motivated to oppose commonsense measures to secure our nation’s borders and enforce our nation’s immigration laws, seeing in a flood of Third World foreign nationals, potential future voters who would support their party’s candidates.
This is why many cities and states, particularly those controlled by the Democratic Party have created “Sanctuary Cities” that incentivizes illegal immigration thereby undermining national security, public safety, public health and the ability of Americans to find decent jobs.
In my article, “Sanctuary Cities Endanger – National Security and Public Safety” I noted that such cities operate in violation of Title 8 U.S.C. § 1324, a statute comprehended within the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).
Here are the relevant portions of this section of law:
Harboring —Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii)
makes it an offense for any person who—knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation.
Encouraging/Inducing —Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) makes it an offense for any person who—encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law.
Conspiracy/Aiding or Abetting —Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(v) expressly makes it an offense to engage in a conspiracy to commit or aid or abet the commission of the foregoing offenses.
Trump’s goals of securing America’s borders and enforcing our immigration laws are an anathema to the goals of the globalists and so they accuse Trump and those who support his immigration enforcement plans by creating a false narrative linking immigration enforcement with racism and xenophobia. These lies have incited demonstration and riots.
Title 8, United States Code, Section 1182, is the section of law included in the INA that enumerates the categories of aliens who are to be excluded the United States.
The grounds for exclusion are oblivious as to race, religion or ethnicity but deem as excludible aliens who suffer from dangerous communicable, diseases or extreme mental illness.
Additionally, convicted felons, human rights violators, war criminals, terrorists and spies are to be excluded as well as aliens would like become public charges or those aliens who would seek unlawful employment, thus displacing American workers or driving down the wages of American workers who are similarly employed.
Aliens who violate our immigration laws therefore must be seen as a potential threat to national security, public health and public safety and/or to the livelihoods of American workers.
For unscrupulous politicians, however, the truth is an impediment that must be overcome.
My recent article,“Jimmy Carter: Originator Of The Orwellian Term ‘Undocumented Immigrant’ _How the former president manipulated immigration enforcement policy to influence elections_” was predicated on a news report published by CBS on September 15, 2016, Jimmy Carter: The U.S. is seeing a ‘resurgence of racism’” in which, just weeks before this year’s presidential election, Carter apparently laid the foundation for the demonstration and riots.
Carter was the first president to use immigration law enforcement (or the lack thereof) as a political tool to gerrymander Congressional districts and Electoral College votes.
During his administration Carter became the first president to implement Orwellian Newspeak about immigration, demanding that INS (Immigration and Naturalization Service) personnel refer to “Illegal Aliens” as “Undocumented Immigrants” threatening noncompliant officials with extreme disciplinary consequences.
By insisting that all foreign national present in the United States be referred to as “Immigrants” it became a simple matter, especially over time, to alter the public’s understanding of our immigration laws and their significance for national security, public safety and the general safety and well-being of America and Americans.
Inasmuch as we are a “Nation of immigrants” anyone who opposes the presence of “immigrants,” irrespective of their immigration status, are “Anti-Immigrant.”
The news media describes immigration anarchists who oppose secure borders and oppose effective immigration law enforcement, as being “Pro-Immigrant,” while accusing those who support securing our borders and enforcing our immigration laws of being “Anti-Immigrant.”
The official report, “9⁄11 and Terrorist Travel – _Staff Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States_” focused specifically on how international terrorists entered the United States and embed themselves as they went about their deadly preparations.
The preface of this report begins with the following paragraph:
“It is perhaps obvious to state that terrorists cannot plan and carry out attacks in the United States if they are unable to enter the country. Yet prior to September 11, while there were efforts to enhance border security, no agency of the U.S. government thought of border security as a tool in the counterterrorism arsenal. Indeed, even after 19 hijackers demonstrated the relative ease of obtaining a U.S. visa and gaining admission into the United States, border security still is not considered a cornerstone of national security policy. We believe, for reasons we discuss in the following pages, that it must be made one.”
On November 10, 2016 the New York Post reported, “Is the city about to scrub records of undocumented immigrants?”
_The city’s municipal ID program_ [_anticipated that Republicans might control Congress after this year’s elections](http://nypost.com/2015/02/16/municipal-id-law-has-delete-in-case-of-tea-party-clause/), leading Mayor de Blasio on Thursday to say he’s looking to safeguard records submitted by undocumented immigrants “in light of what’s happened.”_
The reference was to Donald Trump’s stunning victory, which gave Republicans control of the White House and both houses of Congress.
The municipal ID program, which was enacted in January 2015, includes a one-time provision giving the mayor power to scrub the data of cardholders on or before Dec. 31 just in case of such an eventuality.
Mayor de Blasio’s municipal ID’s help illegal aliens do business in the New York City and is yet another component of the sanctuary policies of New York City that effectively shield illegal aliens from detection by federal authorities.
Those identity documents fly in the face of commonsense the findings of the 9⁄11 Commission and also provide illegal aliens with a level of credibility that they should not have.
Demonstrators who may think they are rooting for the “underdog” need to wake up. They are protesting the very laws that were enacted to protect them, their families, Americans irrespective of race and the lawful immigrants who came to America seeking freedom, peace and opportunities.