U.S. Central Command released its latest phase of the report on the Abbey Gate terrorist attack which killed 13 American servicemembers during Biden’s botched evacuation from Afghanistan.

Predictably the report claims that the attack was not preventable even though there had been calls to close the gate, Marine snipers had identified the bomber who had been released by the Taliban after Biden’s decision to abandon Bagram Air Base and the terrorists who were there and asked for permission to take him out, but were denied.

Was Abbey Gate preventable? Obviously. At multiple levels. Beginning with Biden’s decision to abandon Bagram to the same punishing rules of engagement that prioritized Muslim civilians over American soldiers.

Faced with testimony from a survivor that he had eyes on the bomber, the report claims that he was wrong.

The report further insists that it didn’t matter that Biden abandoned Bagram because ISIS “had multiple bombers that were available… and this supports the conclusion that the attack at Abbey Gate was not preventable at the tactical level.”

Not preventable at the tactical level? There was just no way to keep a suicide bomber from killing 13 servicemembers?

ISIS just has infinite bombers and nothing that could have been done, nothing at all, would have stopped an attack? Then maybe we should just surrender now.

Of course, there’s a massive caveat there in the report.

“The terrorist attack at Abbey Gate was not preventable at the tactical level without degrading the mission to maximize the number of evacuees.”

Now that might have been noble if the priority was to evacuate Americans. It was not. Americans were left behind. The priority was evacuating Afghans, and not even allies, but those allowed through by the Taliban.

American soldiers died so Afghan migrants could be illegally dumped in the United States to commit terrorist acts here.

Understandably that’s the sort of thing you would want to cover up.