|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
[Craving even more FPM content? Sign up for FPM+ to unlock exclusive series, virtual town-halls with our authors, and more. Click here to sign up.]
In Great Britain, tens of thousands of people came out this summer to protest against Muslim criminals, and to bewail the failure of their government both to halt Muslim migration and to enforce its own deportation decisions. In France, the government is without a prime minister, as President Macron struggles to avoid confronting the matter that most exercises the French — Muslim migrants, the expense they cost the French taxpayers, the crimes they commit, the general sense of disorder and insecurity they create in the land. In Germany, the anti-Muslim immigrant party, Alternative für Deutschland, has become the winner in the recent election in Thuringia, and the runner-up in Saxony, results that have sent the other parties into a panic, as AfD’s inexorable rise, despite the national media’s attempts to blacken its image as a “most far-right party since the Nazis,” continues.
More on those Muslim migrants, and the growing rage in Europe expressed by people fed up with their governments’ inability to deal with the Muslim migrant crisis, can be found here: “Continental Spring? Europe Could Be One Violent Migrant Incident Away From a Revolution,” by Anthony Grant, New York Sun,
Could Europe be facing its own version of the so-called Arab Spring? That era of uprisings and rebellions started with the despair — and suicide by fire — of a single Tunisian street vendor. It tore through the political fabric of much of the Middle East. In Europe today, disaffection with leaders seen as detached from the realities of migrant crime is roiling politics across the Continent.
Immigration, of course, isn’t the only issue. The spiraling cost of living — inflation and currency debasement — is among the issues that are contributing to the turmoil on the continent. In such an overheated climate as this, in any event, it would take only one incident to send people into the streets clamoring for common-sense change….
Why do these migrants want to go to Great Britain? The answer is simple: it is easier to enter the social services in the UK than in France. And the British are even more generous, in the cornucopia of benefits they lavish on these economic migrants posing as “asylum seekers,” than are the French. The free or subsidized housing is better, the medical coverage under the National Health Service more extensive, the family allowances and unemployment benefits larger in the UK than in France. If these migrants were genuine “asylum seekers,” they shouldn’t care which European country granted them asylum, but they are not asylum seekers; they are economic migrants, and will head for those countries in Europe where the benefits are biggest. These are the UK, Germany, and Sweden.
The Sun goes on to say that in France, President Emmanuel Macron did not “internalize” – that is, take to heart — the reasons for the National Rally’s success. This is the party of Marine Le Pen, and voters turned to it because it is the only party that directly addresses the Muslim immigration crisis, and promises to not only call a halt to that immigration, but to repatriate Muslims, beginning with those who have been convicted of crimes. Macron continues to avoid discussing the “Muslim migrant” problem, for he does not dare to echo the National Rally and Marine Le Pen. That would allow his opponents on the left, such as the antisemitic Jean-Luc Mélenchon, to paint him as a “racist” and “Islamophobe.” Instead, Macron is attempting to direct public attention away from Muslim migration and onto other matters.
Waves of Muslims continue to pour into Western Europe each year, claiming to be “asylum seekers,” but in reality they are economic migrants, costing European taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars in welfare benefits each year. In 2023, $36 billion was spent on these migrants in Germany alone. The Muslims in Europe are responsible for a vast increase in both crimes of property and crimes of violence, such as street assaults, rapes, and murders. There is a general sense of insecurity and malaise, and governments are apparently incapable of cracking down on this migration, much less stopping it altogether, and unable to enforce their own deportation orders. A few more high-profile stabbings by Muslim migrants will lead to new expressions of popular rage, akin to that on display in the UK this summer. Europeans are turning rightward because of only one thing: their anger against their governments’ inability to handle the Muslim immigrant crisis.
If this is correct why did Britain just elect the Labour Party
They lied to the voters. The voters swallowed the lies.
1] For decades, the UK has voted alternatively for either Labour or Conservative, despite the existence of many smaller parties.
2] Despite the public’s general great dissatisfaction with the ruling Conservative party for their failure to commit to their declared policies on two major issues – immigration numbers and energy (i.e. Net Zero) both of which led to many other problems, not enough voters took the plunge to make a real difference by changing their voting habits, since it was a foregone conclusion that Labour would perpetrate the same failing policies as the Tories, only more so.
Britain has a strange voting system whereby parliamentary seats do not match the numbers of votes cast, partly due to constituency boundaries, the unfairness of which many electors have complained about for years…..
3] In numbers, 9.7m voted Labour, who got 411 seats, 6.8m voted Tory with 121 seats and although 4 m people voted for the real “change” party – Reform – (i.e. 2 in 5 voters), they were only given 5 seats, whereas the LibDems with fewer votes (3.5m) won 72 seats, an obvious injustice politically. There are many more fringe parties that attract small numbers of voters which added up, affect the overall result.
In conclusion, although 80% of those registered to vote did not vote Labour, their votes in total were spread too widely to reverse the issues that allegedly concerned most voters, which have indeed continued to worsen since the election, in addition to many more that were unforeseen…..
Party over people? Same as it is in the US with voting for Kamala.
This is what’s coming to America.
‘They’re turning rightward’ after decades of being leftists. Colloquially speaking, the Eurotrash shit in their own nest.
“Why Europeans are turning rightward.”
It’s easy and you don’t have to write long articles. White Europeans are getting sick of the rape gangs, the knife murders, and the endless money being spent on these Muslim ferals, and having their countries overrun by a race of ignorant lazy monkeys.
Kick them out. Deport them. And arrest all elected leaders who support this garbage, especially the new fascist PM of England. And return the right to own firearms to Englishmen.
It’s not fair to call them monkeys. Monkeys are clever.
The only way to be rid of the Islamic invaders is to mobilize the military and send all Muslims packing out of the EU. Of course, this will never happen, and the EU peoples are the proverbial frogs in the stewpot being brought to a boil.
FYI Stramer is not the PM of England, he is however the PM of Britain and England is indeed a part of the Britain alongside Scotland Wales and N.Ireland.
Would you claim Biden is President of Delaware or America?…. Just asking…
In the UK, the Conservatives got their plow cleaned in the last election, b/c the people who ordinarily vote for them stayed home and didn’t vote. Why? b/c the conservatives there play the same rope-a-dope game as the Republicans here. They talk a good game about reigning in government, bringing immigration under control, etc. But they don’t actually do what they say they’re going to do.
As House Speaker, Mike Johnson has been a colossal failure. I can point to many reasons, but the House being forced to pass a Continuing Resolution to fund the government stands apart from the rest. The need for a CR is in turn the result of the House’s inability to pass separate appropriations. IOW, business as usual.
One large expenditure that MUST be ended is funding of the State Department’s grants to NGO’s which assist in the invasion of our country by illegal immigrants.
Another strike against Johnson is his promise in November 2023 to release Jan 6 videos. A few weeks later he released a few, then nothing. He broke his word.
My vote for a Republican in the 2024 election is not automatic. My Senator, Ted Cruz referred to the Jan 6ers as terrorists, and hasn’t done a thing to help them. He’ll have to defeat Colin Allred without my vote. Likewise, if Roger Williams, my congressman, won’t commit not to vote for Mike Johnson for Speaker, he’s not getting my vote.
I have not voted FOR a president since Ronald Reagan. What I have done since that time is to vote AGAINST the democrat candidate.
Withholding my vote from the lesser of two evils seems like “cutting off my nose to spite my face.” “Silence in the face of evil is evil itself.”
Please reconsider your position about voting – – “Open Borders and Abortion Until Birth” Allred is not someone we want as a Senator.
If all of our countries would shut off the spigot of “free stuff”, they would all go home on their own. The ones that don’t we can ship back to where they came from.
The free stuff is predicated on the assumption that they are asylum seekers needing us to rescue them. We might be better off saying that they can come if they have the name of a sponsor who will give them accommodation, plus money for six months’ support, during which time they can look for a job. Since they are going to come anyway, their money should be used for their support, rather than feathering the nests of people traffickers. This would also mean that we would be entitled to set some boundaries on the types of behaviour that will result in withdrawal of visas and deportation. And it should be understood that there can be no status changes midway – i.e., you can’t suddenly discover that you are fleeing a repressive regime after raping someone as an economic migrant.
The other thing is that this (I’m writing in the UK) would re-open the door to Eastern Europeans, whose values and aspirations more nearly match our own. As things stand at the moment, Brexit has not addressed Muslim migration, but has stopped hard working Poles and Lithuanians – a distinct own goal.
My friend, Islam is here to conquer, and most of the EU peoples will be eliminated or will knuckle under the Muslim domination and your history will be erased.
“Waves of Muslims continue to pour into Western Europe each year, claiming to be “asylum seekers,” but in reality they are economic migrants, …”
Half right — they are “welfare migrants.”
An economic migrant migrates for economic conditions to work and provide for their family and survive. Many (most?) of the current immigration wave are coming for benefits, even those that work are receiving more in direct and indirect benefits than they put in.
Call them what they are. Fight the lies that they are here for asylum or to build a better life, or climate change. They are here to suck up tax dollars.
What we get instead of change is ineffective protests, sporadic, uncoordinated, unorganised. A leader who means business is needed. Someone determined and ruthless who can bring people together and then manage the job. Who has the stomach for that ? You need someone who can articulate a clear sense of us and them.
Invaders, not migrants.
Migrants assimilate, invaders force the natives to assimilate.