When Muslims kill Americans, then Obama is all about not jumping to conclusions.
Boston Marathon bombing by two Muslim terrorists?
“We still do not know who did this or why and people shouldn’t jump to conclusions before they have all the facts,” Obama said.
Fort Hood Massacre by a Muslim Jihadist?
In the wake of the deadliest mass shooting at a U.S. base, President Obama on Friday cautioned against jumping to conclusions on the motive of the suspect.
“We don’t know all the answers yet and I would caution against jumping to conclusions until we have all the facts,” Obama said in the Rose Garden of the White House.
But Muslims got shot? Obama is jumping all over those conclusions.
“Yesterday, the FBI opened an inquiry into the brutal and outrageous murders of Yusor Mohammad Abu-Salha, Deah Shaddy Barakat, and Razan Mohammad Abu-Salha in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. In addition to the ongoing investigation by local authorities, the FBI is taking steps to determine whether federal laws were violated. No one in the United States of America should ever be targeted because of who they are, what they look like, or how they worship,” Obama said, on the Chapel Hill shootings.
Now these aren’t just words.
Local law enforcement and local Federal people had viewed this as a parking dispute. Obama’s pressure has once again hijacked a local case with Federal pressure for a particular outcome.
We’ve already seen this movie play out in Florida and Missouri. Both times Obama’s conclusion jumping was proven wrong.
But the bigger question is why Obama feels the need to warn us against jumping to conclusions when Muslims kill Americans, but jumps to conclusions when it’s the other way around?
The answer would be much the same as why he called the murders of Jews in a Kosher supermarket by a Muslim terrorist “random”, but is insisting, evidence to the contrary, that this was an Islamophobic killing.
Obama has a bias. It’s not subtle. And it leans toward Mecca.