As I discussed in yesterday’s Freedom Center webinar, the battle against the election theft is taking place on multiple levels and from multiple angles. Just as the fraud occurred on multiple levels and from multiple angles.
One of the sounder legal strategies is taking on the unilateral and illegal moves by Democrat state officials that fundamentally changed how elections were run.
And so far it’s the first legal strategy that appears to be paying off.
A Pennsylvania judge has ruled in favor of the Trump campaign by concluding segregated ballots should not be counted. Further, the judge found that Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar lacked the “statutory authority” to change election law just days before Election Day.
“[The] Court concludes that Repsondent Kathy Boockvar, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Commonwealth, lacked statutory authority to issue the November 1, 2020, guidance to Respondents County Board of Elections insofar as that guidance purported to change the deadline in Section 1308(h) of the Pennsylvania Election Code…for certain electors to verify proof of identification, based on Secretary Boockvar’s interpretation and application oof the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision in Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Boockvar,” the ruling states. “Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS that Respondents County Boards of Elections are enjoined from counting any ballots that have been segregated.”
It’s a win, but it’s one victory in a much bigger battle. But it shows the legal vulnerability of the Democrat unilateral election rewrites.