|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
[Want even more content from FPM? Sign up for FPM+ to unlock exclusive series, virtual town-halls with our authors, and more—now for just $3.99/month. Click here to sign up.]
Among the unintended consequences of Pope Francis’ recent letter to the American bishops on immigration, the exposure of his globalist worldview and agenda ranks as the biggest.
FrontPage Magazine has reliably reported on that agenda over the years. But this time, perhaps for the first time, Catholic journalists and analysts are discussing it openly.
Edward Pentin, a veteran Vatican correspondent who has written for numerous print outlets, broached the subject in his most recent blog post.
“Just a fortnight into the Trump presidency and the damage wrought by the Pope and the Vatican allying too closely with Democrat-run globalism on a variety of moral issues is becoming clear,” wrote Pentin, alluding to an article from the director of a Catholic think tank in Italy.
Nine days after President Donald Trump’s inauguration, Stefano Fontana, who leads the Cardinal Van Thuan International Observatory on the Social Doctrine of the Church, accused the Vatican of colluding with “the owners of the Web, the major press, the universities, the so-called philanthropic foundations, the international agencies, the main Western governments and the management of the European Union,” he wrote, to create “an elitist and totalitarian post-democracy managed by the American Democratic administration” that would enforce policy on immigration, the environment and gender ideology.
FrontPage’s readers might remember Pope Benedict XVI, the ostensible theological conservative, advocating a supranational authority “with teeth,” he wrote, to make economic, social and political decisions for individual countries.
“There are many reasons to argue that the Catholic Church had contributed to that totalitarian system,” wrote Fontana, who argued that such a commitment muted the church’s moral voice on homosexuality and abortion, as FrontPage long argued.
Regarding abortion, the church’s voice “has become feeble and almost absent, preferring to intervene on immigrants and the environment,” Fontana wrote. When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022 in a 5-4 decision — with all three of Trump’s selections voting to overturn — “the Vatican simply took note,” Fontana wrote. Before Trump pardoned protesters who blocked entrances to abortion clinics, “the Church had not mobilized any protest in their defense.”
Meanwhile, “homosexuality is now accepted as something normal — ‘God loves us as we are,’ ” Fontana wrote, with the church “not willing to fight any battle on the subject.” Fontana cited Francis’ advocacy for legal recognition of same-sex couples and the blessing of same-sex unions, and Chicago Cardinal Blase Cupich’s support for same-sex couples adopting children.
His fellow bishops consider Cupich as one of the more notorious papal sycophants.
Yet perhaps the most blatant example of the Vatican’s embrace of globalism concerns COVID-19. Francis not only persuaded Catholics to get the mRNA vaccine as an “act of love,” despite concerns about the use of aborted fetal cells in the vaccine, because “love is also social and political,” he said. The pope not only purged Puerto Rican Bishop Daniel Fernandez Torres for opposing vaccine mandates.
Francis used a Vatican medical conference in 2021 to promote mRNA vaccines (See pages 6 and 7 in the second link). Moderna supplied both the funding for the conference and its CEO, Stephane Bancel, to speak on the potential for such vaccines.
Though ensuing research has shown the COVID-19 vaccines to be ineffective and deadly, neither Francis nor his bishops nor the Vatican as a whole have admitted any responsibility for perpetrating scientific fraud.
“Not a word has been heard, I don’t say of apologies but at least of rethinking or course correction, from the ecclesiastical leaders,” Fontana wrote. “No bishop has said he regretted having closed the churches and sanctuaries in obedience to the WHO, of having supported the self-interested lies of paid virologists, of having forced his priests (even today those who refuse to get vaccinated are opposed and discriminated against in the dioceses).”
For Fontana, the Vatican’s alliance with globalist utopians constitutes moral capitulation.
“The first difficulty of the Catholic Church is precisely … not having been able to free itself from the dominant ideological power … not having defended justice as it should have,” he wrote. Declaring the World Economic Forum to be an ally of common welfare while persuading American bishops not to withhold communion from politicians who support legalized abortion, Fontana added, “demonstrates a line of obsequiousness to the current system of social control.”
R.R. Reno, the Catholic editor of the journal First Things, also connected the pope’s position on immigration to globalism.
“The practical upshot of the Holy Father’s letter is nothing other than the globalist, open borders position, glibly theologized,” Reno wrote Feb. 11. “This, Francis implies, is the only position permitted for true Christians who honor Christ’s universal love.”
In reinforcing the connection between the Vatican and globalist utopians, Reno accuses Francis of exploiting desperate migrants as human shields protecting his “woke” agenda.
“Pope Francis claims to be taking the side of the vulnerable, but his rhetoric aligns with attitudes and statements characteristic of progressive elites,” Reno wrote. “‘Inclusion’ is a tell-word, and it crops up often in papal pronouncements regarding immigration. The Holy Father insists that we must not enforce immigration laws. To do so would lead us ‘to give in to narratives that discriminate.’ That’s the same rationale for not enforcing laws against shoplifting.”
Those human shields also provide the soldiers to trigger the kind of social disintegration that would make a so-called Great Reset necessary. After the COVID-19 pandemic, Francis imitated the WEF in calling for such a reset. In 2021, the Vatican even held a one-day economics conference, “Dreaming of a Better Restart.”
“Reading Pope Francis over the years has led me to believe that he harbors an apocalyptic dream for the West, one in which mass migration and ecological peril overturn the foundations of Western confidence and global hegemony,” Reno wrote. “In this regard, his thinking accords with post-colonial ideologues and those at pro-Hamas rallies.
“The West is a den of iniquity. Its capitalism foments greed. Its enterprises have raped mother nature and polluted the biosphere. Its vainglory, especially American pride, has brought war and ruin to foreign lands. The wretched of the earth are fully within their rights to rise up, migrate, and destroy the Behemoth.”
Francis thus threatens to transform the Catholic Church from a protector of Western civilization, a historic role, to its destroyer.
“I see Pope Francis as more than a wooly-headed moralizer,” Reno wrote. “By all appearances, he’s an accelerationist, someone who welcomes catastrophe rather than appealing to Catholic social doctrine to make nuanced judgments that might help us humanize, as best we can, the policies and actions necessary to prevent the social upheaval that attends rapid demographic change, and the disorder it will bring.
“The Argentine Jesuit seems to relish collapse. It will provide an opportunity to break the iron grip of homo economicus and build a new world, a ‘fraternity open to all.’ This borderless fraternity is a true utopia, a world of no-place, a future universal society free from the grave evil of loyalty to one’s country — Donald Trump’s terrible crime against universal love.”
In other words, Francis becomes John Lennon. Imagine.
Bishop Joseph Strickland — one of Francis’ most forthright critics whom the pope purged from his post in the diocese of Tyler, Texas — argued that the Vatican’s globalist agenda includes a strong monetary component, as FrontPage recently exposed.
“There has long been a concern about the Church’s financial ties — particularly with globalist organizations — as well as concern about government funding and wealthy donors who have a vested interest in certain political outcomes,” Strickland wrote Feb. 13. “Especially in the case of immigration, there is a large financial element at play. Stronger immigration enforcement means less funding for these programs, which is undoubtedly a large factor in the Vatican’s stance.
“On the other hand, abortion and gender ideology do not offer the same direct financial incentives for the Church to oppose them aggressively. While Catholic doctrine condemns these practices unequivocally, to speak out about them risks alienating powerful political allies and financial supporters.”
Those allies include Columbia Economics Professor Jeffrey Sachs, a papal advisor who helped develop the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. Sachs wrote a book advocating abortion as a means to limit population worldwide.
For years, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò warned about Francis’ alliance with globalist utopians. Reaction to the pope’s letter on immigration has proven Viganò right.
Not for nothing did Reno call that alliance an “apocalyptic dream” and Francis’ letter a “suicide note.”
The Pope isa Phony the Vatican is a Scam their Satanic Worship gose on and on like the Energizer Bunny
The nature of reality is that it is complex. Each person’s unique individuality adds to the whole of the society to which he belongs. This washing over the diversity that comprises the whole is sooo typically part of the human tendency to simply things. However, simplicity – fewer people, fewer ideas, fewer questioners and questions, fewer distinct societies, fewer languages, fewer opportunities for the individuals, etc., – is just a pandering to our own need to understand the world in linguistic terms that can never match reality – not in structure and not over time. Rather, simplilfication is a fool’s paradise. Better to immerse ourselves in a complexity that is closer to reality than denying complexity. The Pope is a simplifier. Love, universal truth, destruction as positive, everything the same value, the use of people as tools for ideas, are all reflections of the need for simplification.
Let us try to understand complexity instead of destroying it and denying its reality. Here is a cross-cultural insight: In spoken Hebrew there is a common phrase that appears both in daily speech and song: “to accept black-white.” ‘Black-white’ is a phrase that means accepting ‘good-bad’, the duality of most events. I sat next to a man in synagogue for many years who survived Auschwitz, but his optimism led him to say things like, “I never would have met my wife in ordinary life, had we not been thrown together by the concentration camp experience.” I was dumbfounded by this statement, but I did not experience his suffering. He accepted ‘black-white’ much more than I could at that point in my life.
One should never use diversity to gloss over evil. As for your Black-White and the Auschwitz survivor, he has gone into the depths of the depravity he survived in order to find one good thing from the rubble of evil. It is a choice as Viktor Frankl speaks about it in his book, Man’s Search for Meaning.
As my life has included many horrors from which I could not escape and in adulthood I had to do similarly as this man did, I also taught this to my son. I shared with him that bad things happen to people in life, however, it is incumbent upon him to relentlessly search through the bad until he finds one good thing. It is the jewel he must put in his backpack and carry it forward in his life. I began teaching that when he was eight years old. By the time he reached adulthood, he had many precious jewels in his backpack and tremendous skills in searching out a matter and finding the good amongst the bad. He black-white of life.
Amounts to foreign governance and USA should refute it
There is someone even more vile and evil than Francis waiting to replace him.
You don’t mean, – The Devil himself, do you ?
“I believe that the medievals understood much better than the moderns on what basis to build a totalitarian society that would last and not collapse in less than a century. They did it and the people in the rising religious movement today know that full well. They’re the ones who have millions, upon millions, upon millions, of followers and a real insight into the fact that economics is not the crucial factor, but philosophy and culture are…. Religion has been the root of [totalitarianism] from the beginning, it has ruled in disguised forms, and still is, and now the disguise had to be stripped off… What socialism is doing is really helping religion, the bigger the statism, the more people grow accustomed to government rule over everything, the more people are ready for religionists to take over the lead from the more secular side… The socialists are building the basis for totalitarianism but only the religionists are going to cash in on it and take over.” – Leonard Peikoff
I knew it couldn’t last.
The usual lecture from Lenny’s Piehole.
The mentally deranged just can’t hold on for more than a few months without posting some precooked pile of anti-religious/socialist massive plot to take over the world.
Guess what. Trump’s president and the Cloward & Piven socialist plot has been defeated, for at least the next four years. Your hero Obama will not be around politically to run a shadow presidency any more, and everyone now sees through him and you.
Maybe you should go to the E.U. where socialism is still alive and well and we would finally rid of you and your weak sauce B.S.
Gollygosheroonie….I feel like I’ve gone back in time to the Biden years.
Collectivism and socialism come from Christianity. Christianity does NOT lead to the Free Market but to a collectivist, socialist, theocracy. Always has and always will. The Christians on the Right are the ones who are mistaken about Christianity.
From “POPULORUM PROGRESSIO, ENCYCLICAL OF POPE PAUL VI, ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF PEOPLES”
MARCH 26, 1967
The Use of Private Property
23. “He who has the goods of this world and sees his brother in need and closes his heart to him, how does the love of God abide in him?” (21) Everyone knows that the Fathers of the Church laid down the duty of the rich toward the poor in no uncertain terms. As St. Ambrose put it: “You are not making a gift of what is yours to the poor man, but you are giving him back what is his. You have been appropriating things that are meant to be for the common use of everyone. The earth belongs to everyone, not to the rich.” (22) These words indicate that the right to private property is not absolute and unconditional.
No one may appropriate surplus goods solely for his own private use when others lack the bare necessities of life. In short, “as the Fathers of the Church and other eminent theologians tell us, the right of private property may never be exercised to the detriment of the common good.” When “private gain and basic community needs conflict with one another,” it is for the public authorities “to seek a solution to these questions, with the active involvement of individual citizens and social groups.” (23)
The Common Good
24. If certain landed estates impede the general prosperity because they are extensive, unused or poorly used, or because they bring hardship to peoples or are detrimental to the interests of the country, the common good sometimes demands their expropriation.
I would suggest that what you say is a result of Roman Catholicism, which is not the same as Christianity.
Same old tired crap from our rezidentura faux philosopher.
As if Pope Paul VI had any more of a window on the future than any of your Objectivist totalitarians had during their short-lived heyday.
Guess what F**kWheat, you don’t get to take over my house. And it’s not 1967 anymore than it is the 1950s when Rand and Piehole were sort of a very small thing.
You will always be a loser pedaling your little scare tactics.
This pope, who falsely dons the covering of Catholicism while being an antisemite (apparently his savior, Jesus, being a Jewish man has completely escaped him) and provides the three- card-Monty protection of the vast network of his global-pedophile priests moved from parish to parish and continuing to sexually violate yet more young people leaving them to keep silent as they are paid off while their lives have been destroyed.
This Argentine Marxist has conned the world into believing in his papal purity wearing these white-robe trappings over the true evil in which he both engages and finds solace in the Vatican catacombs of abject darkness, secretive ceremonies and who knows what else.
That any truly believing Catholic can stomach his regular blasphemy of the holy god he says he represents is a scathing admonition of the ease with which his sycophantic followers refuse to see the man for the heinous human being he is and the pain and suffering of others to which he is completely aligned.
Perhaps, if he actually took the mRNA vaccine, he is being slowly murdered from within by the globalist treachery he supported as his G-d given immune system is being destroyed by this manmade bioweapon.
another conspiracy from another conspiracist. Pope Francis is preaching something rather simply laid out in the parable of the Good Samaritan. He is not formulating public policy. and by the way, the vast weight of medical science is that the COVID vaccines worked. You guys are getting nuttier by the day.
Really? Have you clicked on any of the links in the piece? Or do you prefer to live in your own fantasy world dominated by “mainstream” media?
yes, I did click on the link. one scientist against the overwhelming consensus of medical science. who are you kidding Joe. by the way, I used to be a regular writer for this site. but unlike the current crop of Trump idolators, I actually value our Constitution, the peaceful transition of power and the Buckley school of conservative principles.
So when people in Britain say that their loved ones have died or have been seriously damaged by COVID-19 vaccines, you’re saying that they’re lying?
i would never call anyone a liar unless the knowingly told an untruth. I have no way of knowing the details of individual situations and genetic make up.
Is it possible that a small percentage of folks reacted badly to a vaccine. Of course. If that is your point, I would be hard pressed to argue about it.
Does that mean the vaccine should never be used if it is otherwise highly effective? That is another question that requires the weight of medical research and expertise.
By the way, it is one of the areas where I think Trump deserves credit — his mobilization of the country around WARP Speed.
will leave it there. I will choose my words more carefully in the future. You at least provided a rational response unlike a lot of others posting on this site……..sadly. be well.
None of this should surprise anyone if they have been paying attention. Since the death of Pope John Paul 1, Vatican business affairs have been under scrutiny, as articulated in “In God’s Name,” by David L. Yallop, and “Operation Gladio”, by Paul L. Williams. Pope Francis was party to the coup in Argentina in 1976, which killed some 9000 people. He ascended to the Papacy before his predecessor died, which is not suppose to happen. The church he currently captains has had serious homosexual and pedophile issues for decades, suggesting that his “inclusiveness” is more about hiding corruption that forgiving sinners. Catholicism, IMO, has betrayed its own teachings. The question to ask is who absolves the Church?
The Pope claims to be the “Vicar of Christ on Earth”. He should therefore do like Christ did – preach the gospel. Personal sin is the biggest problem each one of us have – it separates us from God. However, our sins can be forgiven through the death and resurrection of Christ, and only Christ. This should be his key message, everywhere he goes.
The Papacy tells us that the Pope is infallible; which is a blatant lie. They also tell us that the Traditions of the Roman Catholic Church take precedence over the Bible and that the Pope takes ultimate precedence over everything and everyone in the world. That’s not what Jesus taught and it’s not what I believe. Sola Scriptura is what true Christians should believe.
Great article – I am a Catholic and I think Bishop bergoglio is a very evil man in multiple ways.
Thank you so much.
Francis is a Jesuit and the history of the Jesuits is one that is shamefully and violently un-Christian. But of course, they report to the Pope ( the Black Pope of the Jesuits, as he’s called, reports to the White Pope, who is currently Francis).
the link on covid cited one scientist. I could cite 100 giving the opposite point of view
You are basically talking about one link in a story with maybe about 30? As far as Covid is concerned, the thrust of the story, concerns, Francis and the Vatican’s support for the vaccines not because they actually care about people, but because 1) they are promoting a globalist, materialist, utopian agenda, (which they would’ve done had Kamala Harris won the election) and 2) the Vatican not only received money from a major vaccine manufacturer to host a medical conference, but also allowed that manufacturer CEO to discuss the potential of mRNA vaccines. And you don’t view that as a blatant conflict of interest?
This Pope has always been a stinking leftie — to the max. I can hardly wait till he is replaced by automatic processes.
None of you have a clue about the traditions of the Catholic Church or the role it plays in the spiritual realm. That is truly sad. Apologies for not reading every link in Mr. D’Hippolito’s story. I will spare him and all of you the 100 links I could provide saying just the opposite, including from major medical journals. But as the Pope would have me say: peace to you all.