|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
[Order Robert Spencer’s ‘Antisemitism: History & Myth’: NOW!]
After Oct 7, Robert Spencer, the eminent scholar of religions and expert on Islamic terrorism, witnessed the irrational return of antisemitism, not just on the left, but also on the right.
“Fervent and articulate opponents of globalism and socialism began sending me articles in which globalists and socialists rehearsed all the alleged evils and misdeeds of Israel,” he writes.
“Vociferous critics of the United Nations began citing its figures on civilian deaths in Gaza.”
In response, Spencer began working on what would become his latest book, ‘Antisemitism: History & Myth’. Spencer, already the author of numerous critically acclaimed books touching on the intersections of religion and history including ‘Empire of God’, about the Byzantine Empire, ‘The Palestinian Delusion’ and his recent, ‘Muhammad: A Critical Biography’, once again goes back in time and perhaps further so than his past books have ever traveled before.
In ‘Antisemitism: History & Myth’, Spencer traces the origins of antisemitism to an initial pagan reaction against the translation of the Bible until “in the ancient world, revisionist versions of the accounts in the Jewish scriptures became a cottage industry.” Antisemitism became a way to rebut scripture and with it the moral foundations of a divine religion. The more contemptible the Jews were, the less reason there was to respect anything that Moses and later prophets had to say. This echoes the moral inversion that Spencer now sees all around him on social media in which the Jews attacked on Oct 7 become the perpetrators and Hamas becomes the victim.
In trying to understand this present day moral inversion, ‘Antisemitism: History & Myth’ travels through the ancient pagan world, from Egypt to Greece and Rome, through to the rise of Christianity in which Spencer, a devout member of the Greek Orthodox Church, grapples with the troubled history of antisemitism in Christianity, and then on to the Muslim world.
As a scholar of Islamic teachings, particularly those which the politically correct formal world of academia no longer sees fit to acknowledge, Spencer is especially able to trace the history of hate within the Koran and assorted Islamic texts that compare Jews to “apes and pigs”, curse them and call for their annihilation. As his deathbed wish, the founder of Islam vows, “If I live—if Allah wills—I will expel the Jews and the Christians from the Arabian Peninsula.”
Unlike Christianity, within Islam there is no reevaluation, reformation or rethinking of the status of the Jews. And thus contemporary Muslims see Jews exactly the way Mohammed and his followers had and treat them in much the same way. As a subjugated people, the Jews were persecuted, but useful. Once they had been liberated from bondage by the rebirth of Israel, all that remained was a ceaseless war to either return them to bondage or exterminate them.
Much as Islam systematically represses every non-Muslim minority to show its superiority.
As recently as 1880, Islamic Sharia law banned Jews from wearing shoes in Morocco outside the ghetto. Hamas justified its atrocities of Oct 7 by objecting to Jews praying on the site of their former Temple, naming their genocidal campaign ‘Al-Aqsa Flood’ after their mosque built over that sacred site. Such humiliations of non-Muslims form the theological triumphalism of Islam.
The calls for violence by Imams against Jews after Oct 7, with resulting attacks in America and around the world, which ‘Antisemitism: History & Myth’ documents, maintain that tradition. Many of them depend on the same moral inversion that Spencer finds back in the ancient world in which the ancient Pharaoh was the hero and Moses the villain, in which Jewish moral rights can be rebutted by flipping them into moral wrongs and making the villains appear justified.
In Egypt, Pharaoh was reinvented as the hero of the story of the exodus. Today it’s Hamas.
‘Antisemitism: History & Myth’ also delves into the emerging ‘secular’ antisemitism beginning in revolutionary Europe and on to the atrocities of Communism and Nazism whose ideological systems were, as Spencer notes, premised on defining Jews as the ultimate enemies of their creeds and requiring the eradication of the Jews as a people for their utopias to succeed.
The persecution of the Jews under Czarist rule only intensified under Lenin and Stalin climaxing in a “carefully constructed plan in which almost all of the Soviet Union’s two million Jews, nearly all of whom were survivors of the Holocaust, were to be transported to the Gulag—in cattle cars” interrupted only by Stalin’s death, and the USSR’s creation of the ‘Palestinian’ movement.
In ‘Antisemitism: History & Myth’, Spencer delves into everything from Holocaust denial to conspiracies about the Talmud and finally clears away the cobwebs with common sense.
“If the Talmud commands so straightforwardly that Jews behave this way toward Christians, it would be only reasonable to expect that at least some Jews, somewhere, would opt for the more direct approach and simply bomb a church,” he writes. In contrast to those same arguments about Islam, which contends that it’s a ‘religion of peace’, and yet there have been “nearly forty-five thousand violent jihad attacks worldwide” since 9/11. Along with quite a few attacks on churches including a recent beheading of Christians in a church in Africa.
The best evidence of a religion’s teachings is in the behavior of its worshipers.
Moral inversion insists that Islam is peaceful and that the Jews are violent. But everyday reality shows a very different pattern. Antisemitism flourishes when there is something trust that must be denied. In ‘Antisemitism: History & Myth’, Spencer shows that many antisemitic figures were obsessed with denying some basic truth, biblical, historic or that of human nature, as with Marx’s insistence that capitalism was simply a Jewish problem, or the more contemporary insistence that the reality of Islamic terrorism would go away if Israel did not exist.
“This is an age of social contagions,” Spencer warns in his conclusion. Social contagions emerge, vanish and then reappear. Antisemitism may be the most persistent social contagion of them all because there is always something that people want to unlearn, some truth they want to bury and someone else that they want to blame.
My tangent is that hate is another drug high, produced by some of the body’s own chemicals, which also becomes an addiction.
You and I are in agreement about hate and its neurological effects. And it has social and social bonding effects. It’s a high, an addiction. It feels good! Its self rewarding neurologically ( feel strength, power, righteousness rather than more troublesome self evaluation ) and can be socially reinforcing as well.
Exactly. Thanks Cat !!!!!
From what I’ve read there were plenty of Nazis who did their tortures and killing with coldness and no strong emotions at all, they were simply doing their duty as a matter of course.
Hannah Arendt called it the banality of evil.
Haters are addicted to their own anger
There is that high – which is pretty miserable and a very low high – Not even a high – it’s a low – hate is a low – I hate radical jihad izzylam and nazziz, I feel justified and tears and holes within me that became open wounds of my soul on 10-7-2023 being filled with every death and defeat of the terrorists and their leaders. I got a supreme laugh with MOSSAD’s exploding pagers and walkie talkies and how MOSSAD snuck into that creeps apartment and left bombs they detonated when he was inside.
This hate is focused on the terrorists and Iran who sends them out. I do not go around hating someone I see.
But it’s not the high I get from LOVE. I’ve lived long enough to feel love when there are bitter and miserable people around me for whatever reason they are miserable. Hate is toxic and deadly.
I think we can pretty much agree.
We have to personally overcome the misery and bitterness of our life especially in USA.
Of course the demonKKKrats thrive on hate and misery.
MAGA is love and production and life itself.
The spectrum of love and the darkness of hate is confusing to those that hate and are taught hate by their parents and culture they live in.
They are living in their own S**t Storm.
When they shed blood, they must be executed with extreme prejudice!
Perhaps that is true but hate eventually destroys the hater as well as the target of the hatred.
The far right blames the Jews for communism and the far left blames the Jews for capitalism.
Yes. We were way too dark and so hunted and killed by Nazi “Aryans” for it. Now we are very very white privilege oppressors of sainted brown people (many of whom look a lot like us). We are said to be controlling the world but are also considered pigs and dogs.
Our only flaw was ever caring what others think.
I sure don’t
By any standard (look at their attitudes toward women and gays) Islamists belong on the far right. Yet people like Michael Moore, Susan Sarandon and Greta Thunberg are nauseatingly obsequious toward “The Religion of Peace”. Of course, they know they’re hypocrites and liars, and deserve the consequences. “Queers for Palestine” deserve to live (at least until they’re splats on the sidewalk) under Hamas.
I hate the Amaleck.
In reading this article, it seems that Robert Spencer has validated how the pagan world’s fear of G-d is the truest hate-filled motivation to annihilate the Jewish people. No Jewish people, no Oracles of God, No Oracles of G-d and man believes he can do as he pleases.
As stated by Dostoyevsky;
“If God does not exist, then everything is permissible.”
It seems this is precisely what idolatrous man wishes and destroying all Jews is necessary for him to get there.
Thank you for this article and review. I have ordered the book and look forward to reading it.
Has anybody else noticed that the most popular of pop songs are usually idolatrous?
Do we really have to hear them over and over in the grocery store?
What about the Displacement and Ethnic Cleansing of Palestinian Christians from the Palestinian Homeland? Just askin’.
Oh! And really, who has better reason for their antisemitism than Palestinian Christians and non-Jews? Again, just askn’, Danny boy..