Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
[Want even more content from FPM? Sign up for FPM+ to unlock exclusive series, virtual town-halls with our authors, and more—now for just $3.99/month. Click here to sign up.]
The imam of the New Orleans jihadi’s mosque, Eiad Soudan, according to the Jerusalem Post, “has accused Jews of using usury to exploit and take control of the economy wherever they went.” He also said that “Hitler hated the Banu Israil so bad, because of the economy thing, they were in control of the economy,” and added: “So those who say that only the Banu Israil paid the price — everybody paid the price, they say thousands of Muslims were killed.”
Eiad Soudan doesn’t want the world to limit its sympathies to the Jewish victims of the Holocaust, when there are so many others, including Muslims, who suffered during the war. And besides, he tells us, the Jews’ rule over the world’s economy means there was a valid reason for the Nazis wanting to eliminate them.
The mosque Jabbar attended is not about to help in the investigation of Jabbar; it has asked is members not to respond to questions from the media. And if the FBI tries to interview any members of the mosque, they should not answer, but refer the FBI to the Council on American Islamic Relations, or to the Islamic Society of Greater Houston, whose leaders will know how to best handle — that is, explain away or deny altogether — any attempt to link them to Jabbar.
“Imam at mosque connected to New Orleans terrorist says Jews exploit usury to dominate economies,” Jerusalem Post, January
In another statement posted to social media following the New Orleans attack, the ISGH said that it was “horrified” by the event and condemned the “act of terror” as “pure evil.”
But why should the ISGH be”horrified” when one of its members does what the Qur’an commands, and proceeds to strike at and kill Disbelievers? What was it about Jabbar’s act that made it so “horrifying”? Was it, perhaps, the way his act has aroused, quite rightly, more suspicions about Muslims and the ideology of Islam? And if it was so horrifying, why did the ISGH not express at once its desire to cooperate fully with the FBI? Indeed, why did CAIR and ISGH balk at their members providing information about Jabbar’s attendance at his neighborhood mosque, the Masjid Bilal, including any signs that he took to heart certain violent verses in the Qur’an, or about the contents of the khutbas delivered by the Imam Eiad Soudan, whose virulent antisemitism was on display in the sermon he gave about Jewish financial power and the desire, he claimed, of all countries to keep the Jews in “Palestine,” a videotape of which MEMRI managed to obtain?
The ISGH also sent its condolences to the families of those killed, stated it was praying for the quick recovery of those hurt, and encouraged anyone with relevant knowledge to be in contact with law enforcement authorities.
The ISGH’s ostentatious display of sympathy for the victims, and its reversal of policy, by now calling on its own members to contact law enforcement authorities directly if they have any relevant information, does not jibe with its earlier statement, that directly contradicts that advice. Following the attack, media reports cited a social media post by Masjid Bilal, urging members not to respond to inquiries from the media. If approached by the FBI, the statement read, community members should refer to CAIR or ISGH. Now it is telling them to “be in contact with law enforcement authorities.” Clearly, it must have realized that its first remark — trying to prevent cooperation of its members with the police — had aroused such fury and suspicion that it had to reverse course.
And it did.
One hopes the police will take a careful look at what the Masjid Bilal’s imam preached, not just about the perfidious Jews, their usury, their power, but about other Infidels as well. One of the exceptions to the First Amendment right of free speech is the Brandenburg test (Brandenburg v. Ohio), which says that speech can be prohibited if it is “directed at inciting or producing imminent lawless action”; and if it is “likely to incite or produce such action.” Let’s see if the Imam Soudan’s sermons sound as if they could well have contributed to the “imminent lawless action” of Shamsud-din Jabbar. And if so, could Imam Soudan be arrested for influencing Jabbar to commit mass murder?
Questions for study and discussion.
Arrested? Perhaps.
Stopped permanently? Certainly.
Raze this mosque to the ground and deport this fat imam and his jihadi followers forthwith.
One mosque at a time, especially the ones in S. Florida and NYC.
But where to deport these trouble makers? Certainly not to Gaza. I was thinking they should get a choice between Somalia, Sudan or the South Sandwich Islands.
How about the middle of the ocean.
That would be water pollution
Antarctica?
My bad. I keep forgetting this thing won’t accept one word responses, no matter how pithy and relevant. Why use ten words when one will do? Oh well..
How about creating a big lake in central Michigan, with an island in the middle as a home for inciters to terrorism, and stocking the lake with piranha?
It should be kept in mind that Muslims terrorist , Shamsad Din Jabbar using a who viciously murdered fourteen people and severely injured more than two dozen people in a vehicle jihad attack in the city of New Orleans at a New year’s event that engaging in a not a kind of “ warped Islam “ was actual Qur’an based Islam.
For the Qur ‘an instructs in Surah 9:123 “ O you who believe ! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you..” Din Jabbar in that vehicular Islamic attack was maliciously showing those people who aren’t Muslims “disbelievers” in the city very much harshness.
Likewise, gives instructions in Surah 47:4 Whenever you encounter the disbelievers strike off their heads until you make a great slaughter among them…” Din Jabbar, using a truck in a jihadist Islamic terrorist attack was able to inflect a greater “slaughter a among them than a \sword can.
In spite of all the facts of reality , some people still make the false claim that “Islam is peaceful , non-violent religion.” That claim both bogus and 100% balderdash.
It may truly be said that “Islam is a death cult” That is valid and true statement. That death inflicting Muslim terrorist, Shamsad Din Jabbar, who killed many people in the city of New Orleans in New Year’s night is but one of many examples of that terrible truth.
The reason why this is so is because Islam “holy book,’ the Qur ‘an has instructions for the violence of killing and being killed while fighting in the jihad for the advancement of Islam as found in the Qur’ an ,for example, Surah 2:191. 4:89. 9:5, 123. 47:4. This is most terrible.
Furthermore, many a times members of different jihad terror/ murder entities., Each of the own jihad terror group have gathered together and chanted about Westerners and themselves ,over and over again, “They love life , we love death.”
With all this , it stands treason that Islam is really a death cult.
In great contrast, to the dead cult of Islam is Christianity, which is centered on Jesus ,Who taught and gives life and not death. As Jesus declared, “ I have come that they may have life, and that they may have it more abundantly.” John 10:10. [N.K.J.V.]
It’s best to keep it in mind that Shamsad Din Jabbar, after he died in a shootout with the police after he committed those mass murders in the city of New Orleans had a very blatant “reality check.” For in his deluded Islamic viewpoint, which he obtained from the Qur’ an, instead of finding himself in some type of paradise, to his shock and horror he found himself trapped and suffering terribly in the fires of hell, which is described in the Bible, Luke 16:19-24. Matthew 13:41-42. For the Bible informs its reader that a murder “will not inherit the kingdom of God. Galatians 5:21 [N.K.J.V.] Furthermore, Revelation 21:8 also confirms this.
That Muslim Din Jabbar, became literally as it’s termed “dangerous to self and others” because he believed in the falsehood of the promises of the Qur an and likewise his blind unquestioned faith. In the false religion which is Islam.
That horrific jihad vehicle terror murder and maiming Islamic attack on New Years Eve at New Orleans was Islamic murderous violence that is based is based in Islam’s “holy book” the Qur’ an , as found in, for example, Surah 5:33. 9:5, 111,123. 47:4.
There are some naive Westerners who might be shocked to find this out and the wonder and then ask “Just who can Muslim, Shamsad Din Jabbar, being so very religious ,also be so extremely heartless ,unfeeling, brutal and murderous to kill as to murder all those people and main other people in the city of New Orleans ?” The answer that question is found in the Bible. For the Bible reveals there are some men who are so very cold, callous and dangerous because they have had “their own conscience seared with a hot iron” First Timothy 4:2. [N.K.J.V.]
The “hot iron” in this case is Islam.
This Imam, or any Imam in America, could stand in front of his “flock” and call for the all-out murder of infidels 24/7 and no one with the authority to arrest him/them will do anything about it. They know it and we know it. Mosques are the “no go” zones where everyone knows what goes on inside but none dare oppose it. Islamophobia is an antidote to the truth.