This is the story of racism alive and well in America. Not just any racism — really deep racism. Shocking racism. Racism so bad it is unimaginable.
This is the story of a black liberal politician who clearly hates black children.
But the great news is: I know how to stop this. More on that in a moment. First, here is the incredible story of horrible black-on-black racism.
Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser is black, yet she recently demanded that the black schoolchildren of Washington either take the experimental, emergency-use-only COVID-19 vaccine (against their will) or be denied an education.
Can you imagine if any white politician, let alone a white Republican, gave black children an ultimatum, for any reason, that might result in them being banned from an education? What would they call that white politician? “Racist. KKK. Extremist. White supremacist. Nazi.”
But this isn’t just “any reason” for banning a black child’s education. The black mayor of D.C. is demanding black schoolchildren choose between their life and their education. At this point in time, we know two things about this experimental COVID-19 jab:
No. 1: Data from across the world suggests it is killing and injuring people at a rate never seen from any vaccine in world history.
No. 2: The same data from around the world shows that no child needs the vaccine. Some studies have shown children have a 0% risk of dying from COVID-19. Studies have also shown the risk of serious illness from the COVID-19 vaccine is dramatically higher than from COVID-19 itself — perhaps up to 100 times higher.
The latest study was out just days ago. The study, funded interestingly by pro-vaccine interests, shows that at least 22,000 young adults must get the COVID-19 booster jab just to prevent one hospitalization.
Once boosted, that same study found young adults can suffer up to 98 serious adverse effects from the COVID-19 jab, versus each hospitalization from COVID-19. In other words, the jab is far worse for young people than COVID-19 itself — as much as almost 100 times worse. Bowser is playing Russian roulette with the lives of Washington’s black schoolchildren.
One more interesting fact: The U.K. just banned COVID-19 jabs for children under age 12. Yet in D.C. the mayor is demanding children take it.
Remember “The Negro College Fund”? Their famous saying was, “A Mind is a Terrible Thing to Waste.” Here we are decades later, and a black mayor is denying black children an education. At the same time, she’s forcing them to take an experimental jab that could kill or severely injure them. Sounds a lot like the “Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male.”
Martin Luther King Jr. is rolling over in his grave.
So, how do we defeat this terrible racism? The old-fashioned way: with lawsuits. It’s time for a massive class action lawsuit by black parents in Washington, D.C., who don’t want their children persecuted for private health care decisions — and who don’t want their children to have to choose between risking their life and getting an education.
Secondly, King believed in civil disobedience, such as strikes, boycotts and protests. Where are the black parents of Washington, D.C.? Where is the Rev. Jesse Jackson, the Rev. Al Sharpton or former President Barack Obama? Don’t black children’s lives matter? Doesn’t black children’s education matter?
It’s time for a strike. Every black parent in D.C. should keep their children home from school for a day to protest the forced jab.
And it’s time for a “Million Parent March” of black parents in front of the D.C. mayor’s office to tell Bowser no tyrant has a right to deny a black child an education.
Now there’s a “Black Lives” march that conservatives can get behind. I’m certain thousands of white conservatives would gladly march side by side in that mass protest forced vaccines.
The liars that control us know that they can blame those that oppose their corruption for this vaccine. After all they pinned slavery on their enemies. Truth is not in them.
She’s a typical leftist hypocrite – they
Demand diversity, but exclude white people
Claim that everything they do is “for the children”, but excuse (and sometimes condone) pedophilia
Demand electric cars, that run on power (supplied by fossil fuels)
Rant against crime, but attack and defund the police
Want energy independence, but support pipeline shutdowns, cancellation of oil & gas leases, and drilling bans
Demand freedom of the press, but want to shutdown FOX and right wing alternative news sites
Want freedom of speech, but ban books, movies, and conservative speakers
Claim that protestors are terrorists, but ignore the urban destruction wrought by BLM & Antifa
Support illegal immigration and “sanctuary cities”, but reject illegal aliens being sent there
Claim they’re defenders of democracy, but engineer massive, nationwide election fraud
The first step is correcting anyone who refers to the shots as ” vaccines” they are not derived from the agent you are seeking immunization from, they do not directly stimulate a immune response, they do not result in immunity from the agent or agents you seek immunity from. Not vaccines!
Mayor Bowser has become the public face of vaccine supremacy backed by faux science. See https://www.qwant.com/?q=public%20face%20of%20vaccinne%20supremacy%20hutchison&client=brz-brave
Muriel Bowser certainly can’t claim to be following the science, in fact I doubt there is any science there. OK maybe political science.
Bowser also said those children in D.C. who were not vaxxed would be denied having virtual instructions as well!!!
She must be afraid that unvaxxed children will spread a computer virus. It’s a real concern among people as well-educated as she is.
“Martin Luther King Jr. is rolling over in his grave.”
Why would King be rolling over in his grave? He fought for the government to FORCE private businesses to serve blacks against the will of the private owner of the business. King believed that the “common good” was a justification for forcing individuals to obey the government against their will, a justification to violate individual rights and private property rights, a justification to crush the individual.
“The tribal notion of “the common good” has served as the moral justification of most social systems—and of all tyrannies—in history. The degree of a society’s enslavement or freedom corresponded to the degree to which that tribal slogan was invoked or ignored.
“The common good” (or “the public interest”) is an undefined and undefinable concept: there is no such entity as “the tribe” or “the public”; the tribe (or the public or society) is only a number of individual men. Nothing can be good for the tribe as such; “good” and “value” pertain only to a living organism—to an individual living organism—not to a disembodied aggregate of relationships.
“The common good” is a meaningless concept, unless taken literally, in which case its only possible meaning is: the sum of the good of all the individual men involved. But in that case, the concept is meaningless as a moral criterion: it leaves open the question of what is the good of individual men and how does one determine it?
It is not, however, in its literal meaning that that concept is generally used. It is accepted precisely for its elastic, undefinable, mystical character which serves, not as a moral guide, but as an escape from morality. Since the good is not applicable to the disembodied, it becomes a moral blank check for those who attempt to embody it.
When “the common good” of a society is regarded as something apart from and superior to the individual good of its members, it means that the good of some men takes precedence over the good of others, with those others consigned to the status of sacrificial animals. It is tacitly assumed, in such cases, that “the common good” means “the good of the majority” as against the minority or the individual. Observe the significant fact that that assumption is tacit: even the most collectivized mentalities seem to sense the impossibility of justifying it morally. But “the good of the majority,” too, is only a pretense and a delusion: since, in fact, the violation of an individual’s rights means the abrogation of all rights, it delivers the helpless majority into the power of any gang that proclaims itself to be “the voice of society” and proceeds to rule by means of physical force, until deposed by another gang employing the same means.
If one begins by defining the good of individual men, one will accept as proper only a society in which that good is achieved and achievable. But if one begins by accepting “the common good” as an axiom and regarding individual good as its possible but not necessary consequence (not necessary in any particular case), one ends up with such a gruesome absurdity as Soviet Russia, a country professedly dedicated to “the common good,” where, with the exception of a minuscule clique of rulers, the entire population has existed in subhuman misery for over two generations.” – Ayn Rand
Like most people here I am familiar with Rand’s opinions on the “common good”. It was absolutely unnecessary to cut and paste a lengthy quote and append it to an otherwise good comment. Please THX, continue to express your own opinions and leave Rand out of the discussions. Your prolix quotes make your comments unreadable and hence, unread by and large.
WAR, your best piece yet — humane, accountability-driven, geared to justice, and eminently sensible!
If blacks liked each other all so much, perhaps they might not go shooting each other dead all the time?
The vaccine is a bioweapon that will reduce the world’s population to 4.5 billion by 2024. Gates, Fauci, Bourla, every single vax pushing governor and CEO, BIDEN and yes DONALD J TRUMP. deserve Florence Supermax for life for this. Pure evil.
Funny how it works out. C. S. Lewis pointed out the worst tyrants are not the corrupt ones, but those who want to impose their options on you “for your own good”, because they are not restrained by conscience.
Governments are an unmitigated evil, based in pure force of some over others.
By their fruits ye shall know them. Evil roots bring forth evil fruit.