Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Warner Bros has nothing to do with the actual Warners brothers who were Jewish Republicans. It’s just another brand owned by a sprawling media monstrosity that, like the rest of the industry, is dedicated to pumping out recycled versions of its own intellectual properties and disguising that by making them more “diverse”.
With diverse versions of the X-Files, the Little Mermaid and King of the Hill on their way, why not enjoy some butchered classics with more exclusively inclusive and diverse (no white people, please) casting?
With one-hundred years having passed since it opened its doors to filmmakers and audiences alike, Warner Bros. has announced that it will be ringing in its anniversary with “a short film series that reimagines the Studio’s iconic films through a diverse and inclusive lens.”
This isn’t an anniversary of anything except a corporate property. And Warners already demonstrated its regard for the classic movies it owns by pulling them down, denouncing them and sticking trigger warnings on them.
The series will see six of the studio’s classic offerings remade with “representative casting, storytelling, and narrative” by a respective up-and-coming filmmaker, all of whom were specifically selected to participate by “DEI industry veterans,
When you’re looking for creative talent, the place to go is DEI and your friendly local Communist Party official.
The list includes ‘A Star is Born’, ‘Rebel Without a Cause’ and ‘Robin Hood’.
Why do I suspect Robin Hood is going to be a black woman while the Sheriff of Nottingham is going to be white and wearing a MAGA hat?
Who knew that Men in Tights would be remade as a serious dramatic production?
Robbin’ da hood.
omg, Rebel Without a Cause engaging in driveby shootings in the Hood
How abut a woke, white Othello? Oh, wait, then the villain Iago would have to be black, and that would not fly,
Why not Biden Hood?
They’ll have to do a lot of “reimagining,” since Robin Hood stole money from the tax collector and returned it to the taxpayers. Should be a disaster.
They’ve already had three remakes of “A Star Is Born,” since the original in 1937, and the most recent was just in 2017. Couldn’t ask for a more formulaic and adaptable plot, so I guess it’s time to run it into the ground, and redo it every few years. Next up after soul version, is drag queen version, and then hip-hop version.
“Rebel” would be really short in tha hood, Jim would have emptied a mag in Buzz right off the bat. Black people don’t generally go in for “Chickie Run,” type stunts, either. It would probably be like Eddie Murphy’s hilarious black version of “Amityville Horror,” real short.
Looking forward to watching classics, and more Dust scifi, Black Mirror, and Love, Death, And Robots, myself..
Chaucer Reimagined: Tales of the Hood, in Ebonics
They are confusing remaking with unmaking.
Remember, this represents their 100% best effort. Everything else is even worse. Self worship has consequences.
Once again Liberal Hollywood rewrites History to meet their liberal P.C. Goals
Porgy and Bess visit the Hood?