|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
[Make sure to read Daniel Greenfield’s contributions in Jamie Glazov’s new book: Barack Obama’s True Legacy: How He Transformed America.]
At the heart of everything from the debate over the Gaza War to DEI to toxic interpersonal relationships is a disastrous loop known as the “self-reinforcing victim/villain” cycle.
The self-reinforcing victim/villain cycle is a deceptively simple and incredibly destructive paradigm for any kind of relationship, national, communal or personal, in which one party constantly attacks the other while claiming that it is the victim fighting against oppression.
The paradigm is guided by the idea that there is a permanently fixed victim and villain, that the victim is constantly suffering attacks from the villain and that anything the victim does is justified because he or she has no agency except to resist the assaults of the villain.
While some Hamas supporters have lied or tried to cover up the atrocities of Oct 7, Ghazi Hammad, a Hamas official, initially denied them, but then burst out with, “the existence of Israel is what causes all that pain, blood, and tears. It is Israel, not us. We are the victims of the occupation. Period. Therefore, nobody should blame us for the things we do. On October 7, October 10, October 1,000,000 – everything we do is justified.”
“We are the victims”, “nobody should blame us” and “everything we do is justified” perfectly capture the cruel workings of the cycle. So many westerners have sided with Hamas because they accept, incorporate and make use of the same cycle in their own politics and lives.
The very same arguments adapted from Marxism and therapy culture play out routinely in “whiteness” and “colonialist” discourse in America, Europe and other free world nations.
The “self-reinforcing victim/villain” cycle dispenses with arguments, evidence or any reasoned assessments of rights. These may occasionally be thrown in when convenient, but make no real difference because the central premise of the cycle is the lack of any objective standard that both sides have to meet. International law, racial tolerance, peace treaties or negotiations are invoked in a purely one-sided fashion. It is understood that the officially designated victim never has to abide by international law, to stop hating or to sincerely agree to stop the violence.
Any of the invoked appeals to any larger principle are usually rigged in such a way as to render mutuality meaningless. For example, racism has been redefined to mean racial hatred practiced by those with power, making them the officially designated villains, while racial hatred from victims has been designated “reverse racism”: a justified response to the racism of the majority.
Once again, “we are the victims”, “nobody should blame us” and “everything we do is justified”.
Similarly, international law is held to apply only to Israel as the “occupier” while no one can expect anything of the Muslim terrorists who are “occupied” and therefore have the right to “resist” by invading Israel and burning Jewish families alive in their own homes.
The perpetrators are omnipotent by virtue of being helpless, since they can do nothing, they can do everything, as victims of oppression they have no agency and also no restraint under any norms, either those of decency, humanity, the laws of war or any concept of right and wrong.
They cannot be asked not to rage, that’s “tone policing”, not to hate, that’s “reverse racism” or even not to kill because that’s “dictating to oppressed people the forms of their resistance”.
Whatever they do is not a reflection on their own morality, but on the oppression they suffer.
If they hate, it’s because they have been hated and if they kill, it’s because they have been killed. The worse the crimes they commit, the more we are told that the horrors they perpetrate are a reflection of the horrors they have suffered. When suicide bombers emerged on the scene, we were told that they were a sign of how desperate the killers must be after such suffering.
No crime, not even those committed on Oct 7, was allowed to be seen as a deliberate choice.
The moral numbness of the self-reinforcing victim/villain cycle has long haunted liberal minds. As Nazi Germany invaded Poland and began the process that would lead to the mass murder of millions of Jews, the poet W.H. Auden penned a hasty condemnation of Nazism, but threw in four lines that became the best known from the poem. “I and the public know/What all schoolchildren learn/Those to whom evil is done/Do evil in return.”
Those same four lines appear in disguised or undisguised form in every account of the Oct 7 attacks and in every account of the violence committed by leftists and their allies.
How often during the BLM riots were we treated to the MLK quote that, “a riot is the voice of the unheard” which was never intended to be a blank check for urban violence, but is used to shift the agency from the young men beating an old man in the street to the body at their feet.
The insistence that evil is a cycle not a choice, that the Nazis were victims rather than perpetrators, that every terrorist and rioter in the world could not do otherwise is an unlimited license for evil. And evil is not a cycle: it is a choice that each and every one of us makes.
Oct 7 is far from the first time that “we are the victims”, “nobody should blame us” and “everything we do is justified” licensed genocide. And it will certainly not be the last.
Why did so many radicals jump into supporting Hamas after Oct 7 rather than disavow it?
The atrocities did not alienate, they incited. The crimes offered the same heady promise that the Left had since the French Revolution of committing the worst possible crimes while being morally righteous because each horror was a response to the horrors visited upon them.
When there are no objective standards, all that remains are the propaganda narratives that justify violence. The self-reinforcing victim/villain cycle sheds standards. It asserts pain and suffering. It spends all of its time demonizing those it wishes to kill. And then it kills them.
The crybullies, the victims who kill, spend all of their time asserting their trauma, they project hate as pain, murderousness as trauma and assaults as resistance. Even as cities and countries burn, they always talk about themselves while raging when anyone mentions the damage.
Attempting to find common ground with them is futile. Proposals for reforms or compromises are treated as admissions of guilt. Negotiations are blown up because the professional victims don’t want a deal, they want to continue the hate and violence, and they only use negotiations to assert their endless suffering which can only be remedied with the destruction of their targets.
Some attempt to meet them blow for blow, by asserting their own victimhood, and yet this strategy is bound to fail because the underlying premise of the self-reinforcing victim/villain cycle is the “punching up” and “punching down” one of wokeness that only some people’s pain and some people’s lives matter, that those who have “power” are always perpetrators, and those who claim to be “powerless” are always their victims no matter who is actually doing what.
No matter how much those charged with having “power”,deny it, back away from it, leave, turn over control, and cut deals, the underlying dynamic can never be allowed to change anywhere.
Pro-Israel activists, especially liberal ones, still don’t understand this dynamic and are pained and shocked at how their former allies can justify mass murder and rape at a music festival. But the answer is that it’s the same way that supporters of BLM justified torching cities. The self-reinforcing victim/villain cycle rejects any morality except assertions of powerlessness.
Whoever has the most power is accused of setting the cycle into motion and can never assert innocence again even as the Nazis are goose stepping their way into Poland.
What is the answer to the self-reinforcing victim/villain cycle’s endless “you made me do it”?
Giving up power isn’t the answer. Some adopt a Stockholm Syndrome strategy of admitting guilt and promising to “do better”, they clamor to be “allies” and loudly denounce their own people. But when the violence begins, the Stockholmers don’t do any better than anyone else. Whether it’s the Hamas attacks or BLM riots, the appeasers and the apologists were caught up in them.
Some died.
An argument cannot be won by arguing using the self-reinforcing victim/villain cycle’s rules. It is important to think back to a time before the cultural poison reduced every exchange to Marxist logic and social media narcissism when we actually knew what right and wrong looked like.
And the only way to do that is by demolishing the cult of victimhood.
Right and wrong are not determined by expressions of pain. While some people may have more power than others, no one is truly powerless or lacks agency. Whatever happens, everyone has a choice in how they respond to it. That choice defines who they are for as long as they keep making it. People are not the products of impersonal forces, but of those choices.
Anyone can be a victim, but no one has to choose to continue being one unless it’s a role they want to play. And anyone from narcissists to aspiring tyrants finds that to be a useful role.
Most of those who assert victimhood were never victims at all. The most malignant victimhood behavior comes from the powerful and the privileged who use it to claim moral immunity. Lenin came from a noble family and Castro was the son of a plantation owner. Osama bin Laden came from a billionaire family. Hamas had its origins in high officials who were displaced by the fall of the Ottoman Empire and whose families have become millionaires through terrorism.
Every evil movement, including the Nazis, claimed to be the victims, but they’re only the victims of their own thwarted ambitions. Today’s totalitarians who claim to be victims are like them the victims of their futile dreams of conquest and of grinding everyone else under their boots.
“While some people may have more power than others, no one is truly powerless or lacks agency. Whatever happens, everyone has a choice in how they respond to it.”
Yes. There are no excuses in that matter. You do what you can and morality is a personal choice, Do right or do wrong. Be a man or be a bitch.
Speaking of victim-villain syndrome, the left keeps teaching the young and the inexperienced the wrong way to interact with the police. Such as arguing with them, getting physical with them. Be polite, answer their questions, follow their instructions.
Yes. Always conduct yourself with common sense, courtesy and rectitude. It’s amazing that we have to caution people about that nowadays. Especially with the cops. If you’re white, they can shoot you! Fuck that shit.
Idiots.
Who wants to be a victim?
What person would ever want to morph into being a victim?
The only way you’d want to be a victim is if you’ve never been a victim.
The mindset of a faux (foe?)
victim is that of an abusive victimizer, calculating, lying, angry, jealous, violent -a dangerous, insatiably predatory mutation of a decent human being.
And a kind of angry, perpetual childhood.
You just described my ex wife.
Who wants to be a victim? A person who wants to never be held responsible for their own actions – who wants to be considered to have no “agency” – wants to be considered a victim. And now almost everyone wants to be considered a “victim.”. The Marxist “oppressor/oppressed” narrative has, unfortunately, proved very durable and popular, especially in Western societies where being “judgemental” now has nearly the status of being a capitol offense.
Yes, what rational or decent person wants to be a faux “victim?”
Watch “Against the Ice” for a truly great story about two Danish guys who refused to be victims against overwhelming odds.
The two stars of the movie, Nikolaj Coster-Waldau and Joe Cole, knocked it out of the park. Waldau is a very handsome guy and I admire that. Waldau is Danish and Cole is British and they both did a great job.
The fake oppressor/oppressive rationale and narrative destroys the facts of good and evil
We should always be on guard concerning matters we dwell on. God tells us to forgive. The world gives us so much to hate. It presents so much to us to hang our hate on. Hate is a compelling emotion we wear with pride. Being a victim releases one from taking blame for the mess our lives have become or will become.
Thank you Daniel for the dose of clarity we receive each time you put words together.
Yes, thank you David for separating out a “self-reinforcing victim-villain cycle,” I suspect a generalized version of this “cycle” could fit as a common denominator across a host of issue sets. I’m hoping that’s true!
Yeah, hate is a narcotic. It’s almost impossible to resist. I’m strong as fuck and even I can’t resist its seduction.
Whoever down voted me is a hateful dick licker who jerks it to Hillary and Obama porn. How’s that limp noodle working for you?
I’ve been thinking about this lately. Can it not be said that this whole harking back to historical sins by professional “victims” is an anti-Christ philosophy? Or rather – an anti-Christ strategy, which is being employed by the adversary to poison people’s minds?
When one takes on the historical sins of the past, and takes responsibility for them and feels bad because of them, or rather, feels guilty because of those past sins, is this not denying that Christ’s sacrifice is sufficient to account for all of one’s sins?
No Christian should ever pay any heed to any self-professed “victim” of historical sins who insists that we should hold ourselves accountable, and declare ourselves guilty, because of the sins of the past – because this is entirely contrary to the teachings of Christianity.
“Every priest stands day after day ministering and offering the same sacrifices time after time, which can never take away sins. But this man, after offering one sacrifice for sins forever, sat down at the right hand of God. He is now waiting until his enemies are made his footstool. For by one offering he has perfected forever those who are sanctified.” Hebrews 10: 11-14 CSB
“The Lord says, I will put my laws on their hearts and write them on their minds, and I will never again remember their sins and their lawless acts. Now where there is forgiveness of these, there is no longer an offering for sin.” Hebrews 10: 16-19 CSB
No Christian can accept the doctrines being pushed by the enemy, for it is a direct repudiation of the fundamental teachings of Christianity.
“Be sober-minded, be alert. Your adversary the devil is prowling around like a roaring lion, looking for anyone he can devour.” 1 Peter 5:8 CSB
By insisting that people who are alive today take responsibility for, and feel guilty about, historical sins, the “woke” fanatics are doing the work of the adversary, for they are are insisting that people believe the Satanic lie that the sacrifice made by Jesus Christ was not sufficient to wash away all of their sins.
An important point, which many people miss.
An excellent comment!
Read and study your Bibles! The world isn’t getting better, it’s going to get much worse!
I truly desire and wish Hamas ultimate victimhood as they disappear into history. The Islamofascist colonists around the world have raped, tortured, ethnically cleansed and murdered hundreds of millions and are the source of over 75% of all the violence in the world.
The Arabs rule countries from Morocco all across North Africa and through the Arabian Peninsula. Yet they demand that tiny sliver of land we call Israel be given over to the Arabs too, as they still need to screw it up too. They have a long history of conquering and enslaving those whom they meet, and they feel justified in continuing the practice. Crybullies for sure.
The ONLY reason Arabs rule these places is OUR efforts to extract, ship and process oil. They have ZERO ability to anything themselves.
Crybullies, yes. But the ultimate imperialists, too.
— They cannot be asked not to rage, that’s “tone policing”, not to hate, that’s “reverse racism” or even not to kill because that’s “dictating to oppressed people the forms of their resistance”. —
That leaves violence as the only possible response to their violence. The only thing that saves them from annihilation is the self-restraint of their “oppressors.” And therefore…?
I am increasingly convinced that one of the reasons for pervasive hatred of both Israel and Jewish people, is that they refuse to be victims, or to be defined by the wrong treatment that has been disproportionately handed out to them. They pursue excellence, which itself is anathema to people whose philosophy is based on the assumption that there are some groups whose ability to achieve anything at all has been irrevocably stymied by other groups.
Thanks for this article. It is very clear. Even a cry bully could understand it, if they ever read it.
I know the world is on fire and at war. But, I am also applying these ideas to personal relationships. The adult children who no longer speak to their “conservative” parents, breaking hearts but claiming they would be traumatized by them. They are cry bullies. The broken friendships and job losses due to blaming others for being oppressors. Cry bullies again.. I cant help thinking the loss of (benign) religious faith and practice allowed for this distorted lens to be placed over all of life.
Romans 1:28
And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper,
2 Thessalonians 2:11-13
And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: 12That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
What an excellent column. Really highlights and explains the often-ignored mind virus that has increasingly infected (especially but not only) the West for decades and shows no sign of abating.