|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
The first time I heard the controversial social media personality Andrew Tate speak on women, Western society, and masculinity, I immediately thought that he was a radical Islamic extremist. A defector from the Taliban, perhaps? Over the next few months I would hear Tate make outlandish remarks such as, “Women should shut the f**k up, have kids, sit at home, be quiet and make coffee.” And more: speaking of women in general, Tate said, “If I have a degree of responsibility over her, then I must have a degree of authority… You can’t be responsible for a dog if it doesn’t obey you.”
So, when we learned on July 18, 2023, that Tate, who last year converted to Islam, was hoping for, and celebrating the fact of the imminent Islamization of Britain, I cannot say that I was surprised.
In response to the news of a Muslim billionaire winning the right to turn the Trocadero, one of London’s most famous landmarks, into a mosque, Tate (Quran in hand in the photo above) expressed his delight. Here is what he had to say on Twitter:
This building is literally dead centre in the middle of London’s historic centre. Amazing news. The only alternative to Islam for the brits are pride flags as they no longer have any innate culture or patriotisim [sic]. Allah is the best of planners and I look forward to seeing The Islamic republic of Great Britistan in her final form. Alhamdulillah Britain will be fully Islamic soon.
Tate has always had a knack for diagnosing many of the legitimate maladies plaguing Western civilization, which explains his appeal to many conservatives. He is also known for delivering what often seem to be out-of-context solutions to some of these maladies. He understands the crisis in masculinity well and has, at times, offered commonsense advice to young men who are without a sense of purpose or direction in their lives.
The problem, though, is that Tate is himself like a directionless policy wonk, where policies are driven by pragmatism and expediency and not by fundamental principles. He is the embodiment of the very problems he decries. He lies, cheats, is a self-admitted philanderer and the unmarried father of what he claims is a “double-digit” number of children. His social media performances are hyperbolic, and he knows when to sound reasonable and when to be sensational. Moral consistency is a trait he has never possessed. It should come as no surprise, therefore, that he is celebrating the further destruction of the West by promulgating the Islamization of Britain. This has always been part of Tate’s strategy: to commit the fallacy of the “either/or,” a type of argument constructed to mandate the necessity of choosing one of only two alternatives. For Tate, masculinity is in crisis: the problem is autonomous women. The solution is total domination of the modern woman. Western civilization is bankrupt in Tate’s view; therefore, the only solution is to embrace a comprehensive and well-integrated worldview that so happens to embrace the subordination of women: Islam.
Tate would never think of re-orienting western civilization with its Judeo-Christian heritage because contemporary Christianity in the West comes affixed with an unassailable gender equality clause that, under the precepts of liberalism which secure the sovereignty, autonomy, and liberty of each person, does not permit human bondage, domination, coercion, and ownership of persons as we find in the primitive world of Islam.
But Tate was never about providing solutions for anyone. He is what I would call a “self-supremacist.” He has said, if somewhat ungrammatically, “My unmatched perspicacity coupled with sheer indefatigably makes me a feared opponent in any realm of human endeavor.” (I think he meant indefatigability.)
Tate fancies himself an Apex predator. He moved to Romania for years because, he has said, he believed the country to be corrupt and lawless—which meant it gave him freedom to be above laws and regulative principles that govern civilized human behaviors.
Now that he has embraced Islamo-fascism, one hopes the world will see him for who he truly is: an amoral, malignant narcissist who will manipulate language and human beings to achieve power over others. One of his infamous quotes is: “I allow manipulation to find out where my enemy wants me to go. Then I use my mind to break the trap and punish the perpetrators.”
He fancies himself a wordsmith who can dazzle, intimidate, and bully his critics into silence —again largely because there is always a modicum of truth in many of his observations. He is a master diagnostician of the utter moral bankruptcy of modern civilization. The problem is, rather than articulate rational antidotes and even genuine moral feelings, if not ethical thoughts, Tate simply adduces himself as the solution to the nihilism out there — both in word and deed.
But his utter contempt for women (one gets the impression that, like most conservative Islamic men, he does not truly enjoy the company of women at all) and his hypocritical moral inoculants against the debaucheries he thinks are annihilating the West, are mere shields. Behind the deceptive facsimile of hyper-masculinity and machismo lies a deeper veneer: a peeling, cracking, fading veneer that reveals a frightened child who fabricates a mythology about the man he thinks he aspires to be. Tate inflates his relevance and existential value by deputizing his late father as the eternal stand-in for himself. He describes his late father as a master chess player, a one-time CIA operative, and a genius. He has stated that he prefers his symbiotic relationship to his twin brother Tristan to any woman. The two are inseparable – preternaturally close for two heterosexual men who, reasonably speaking, should be living independent lives apart from each other.
Tate needs Islamo-fascism and its tightly structured law and rule-based system for the same reason he needed what he thought were the corruption and lawlessness of Romania: both provide him with a milieu in which to exercise his complete dominion over women, deprive them of their autonomy, and promulgate an ideology consonant with the idea that women lack self-governing agency.
Andrew Tate is less a misogynist and more of maniacal reactionary against the crushing power of female sexuality of which he lives in fear. One should not take his defense of the Islamization of Europe too seriously. To listen to Tate for any length of time turns one into a statistician of gutter trivia. His logic is inconsistent, and he operates from the position of pure self-serving expediency. He lacks the training of a raconteur or even the restraint of a self-sustaining sensationalist. Virile, cruel, unfettered and governed by an amoral ferality, he needs at all times to be ensconced in an environment where his unleashed impulses can have free reign and be left unchallenged, as was the case in Romania before his and his brother’s arrests for allegations of rape and human trafficking – charges the Tates deny [1] – or now, in his newly imagined, Islamized Britain where a radical Hamas-like Caliphate will legitimize his primitive metaphysical view of women that belongs more in the 12th century than in the 21st.
Conservatives sympathetic to Tate should now be disabused of their affection for him. He has become a radical Muslim which means that he sanctions the destruction of a continent by extremist and illiberal peoples who largely remain hostile to assimilation and who wish to push their alien and primitive worldviews onto contemporary Europe. By supporting the Caliphate, he supports Sharia law. He gives voice to extremists who hate the West and whose vocational calling, among other things, is the destruction of the West. There are several ways to defeat the nihilism and post-modern ethical relativism of the West. Islamization is not one of them. I do not believe Tate means to shock anyone; nor do I believe this is a sensationalist move. Tate is a master self-preservationist and power luster whose priority is to unleash his primal sensibilities as his expression of unbridled freedom. His defense of Islam as a solution to the problem of the West is hackneyed, old-hat, and unoriginal.
Real men who are in traditional marriages and who lead their household do not disparage women and refer to them as bitches and whores as I’ve heard Tate speak of women in general on several podcasts. Quite the opposite. Real men cherish their wives. They honor them and take pride in the fact that coercion is unnecessary. Their magnanimity and authentic leadership qualities inspire their women to follow their lead. Tate leads by bullying. Real men lead by strength and consistency of moral character and a desire to provide and protect and leave an enduring legacy. What type of legacy and moral example is Tate leaving for the children he boasts of having out of wedlock?
Tate has women issues which, quite possibly, are traceable to his relationship to his mother, whom he rarely speaks about. Conservatives should not be besotted with a self-serving charlatan who uses disoriented young boys as pawns for a proxy war with the world in general. His tortured relationship to his own masculinity and to women are at the core of his neurotic life. When he stated in October of last year in a now-deleted TikTok video that ISIS members were real Muslims, one again could sense the desperation behind Tate’s declaration, as well as the false alternatives. The world is going to hell. ISIS consists of men who are real men because they fight and stand up for what they believe in. So have criminal dictators like Stalin and Hitler.
The real challenge to pose to Tate, though, is this: in all the false equivalencies and either/or fallacies he has committed, why are his solutions always drawn from the lowest common denominator within a human being or their self-created systems? Why roll in the muck, the swill and detritus, and offer that sort of moral ugliness as some stylized version of oneself as alternatives when the West, by its nature, consists of a plethora of real solutions that, if taken up with imagination and creativity, might yet make a difference and a real turnaround in terms of the moral bankruptcy Tate has properly identified? The problem here is that the diagnostician is just as corrupt and bankrupt as the sickness he has identified.
Notes:
[1] In terms of the “trafficking” charges, Tate’s version is that the charges involve accusations that he allegedly forced several women to give him money that they earned on TikTok, and he asserts that the women involved attest that he did not force or coerce them to do anything. See Tate give his version in his recent interview with Tucker Carlson: HERE. We will continue to carefully observe the facts and revelations of the case as they arise.
Tate is clearly an absurd self-promoter. He’s Andrew Dice Clay but in his case it is not an act but a moral cancer at his soul.
More generally, I’ve seen a trend by conservatives to align themselves with devout Muslims because of a shared social ethos. It was apparent with D’Souza 15 years ago and with CPAC excluding our Robert Spencer. Recently anti-gay forces within the right are looking to Muslims as allies. Tate will be gone tomorrow, but the illiberal right is still a problem for us.
Andrew Tate’s characterization of Islamic doctrine is correct. Jihad, especially becoming Shaheed is considered of the highest piety. Western intellectuals may find this abhorrent and irrational. Yet it is written in the Islamic scripture, despite the frantic whitewashing by Islamic apologists.
Verse please? Sigh
Read some of the books and articles by Robert Spencer. He has all the details about jihad there.
Again. Quranic verses please?….
Dr. Perry Isa Brimah says: “Again. Quranic verses please?….”
The call to violence and murder of infidels verses are in the Quran aplenty. Just as there are verses for violence and slavery in the Bible. This fact is irrelevant because both Christian and Muslim can bullshit themselves and bullshit others that the violent verses don’t really mean what they say. Both the Christian and the Muslim can deceive themselves and deceive others with exegesis and interpretation.
The following applies to both Christianity and Islam, and Judaism:
“To avoid disclaiming the teachings of Jesus [or Mohammed], theologians continue to do what they have done for centuries: they INTERPRET. Passages unfavorable to Jesus [or Mohammed] are reinterpreted in a more favorable light, or they are dismissed as unauthentic interpolations. Anything will do as long as it permits the theologian to profess agreement with the ethics of Jesus [or Mohammed]; the minute he ceases to conform in this respect, he is no longer a theologian, nor can he continue to pass himself off as a Christian [or a Muslim].” – George H. Smith
In other words, the religionist of any stripe always begins with the premise of “Show me the virtue and I will show you my God, show me the vice and I will show you it doesn’t come from my God”.
there’s more to know other than that check out THE MASKED ARAB on youtube u will know what will happen to the west , u are in massive danger
D’Souza is a Christian, and a better American than most.
Who has a huge respect for Islam.
Summing up Qutb’s critique of Western decadence, D’Souza says, “In his view, this is because Western society is based on freedom whereas Islamic society is based on virtue. … On this point Qutb and his fundamentalist followers are quite correct.”
There was an interesting debate between Glazov & D’Souza in 2007 here on FPM if you can find it.
Islam being based on virtue is like saying a street-walker who walks the street only once in a week isn’t a street-walker. I would suggest that Islam base is submission. Any virtue, or related, is a mere chance in it.
Indeed. Islam means submission. I never understood D’Souza’s respect for Islam. None of here did back in 2007 when his book and articles came out in sympathy for some of Islam’s ethos.
Can you or anyone else provide evidence on your claims against Andrew and Islam.
Just cuz I say the orange is a pineapple does not make it so you know
D’Souza believes we brought 9/11 on ourselves. “The thrust of the radical Muslim critique of America is that Islam is under attack from the global forces of atheism and immorality — and that the United States is leading that attack.” “In other words, bin Laden believes that the United States represents the pagan depravity that Muslims have a duty to resist. The literature of radical Islam, such as the works of Egyptian writer Sayyid Qutb, resonates with these themes.” Washington Post Jan 28, 2007
Talking 9/11
1. Why is America shielding the Saudi regime. accused in the civil case?
2. Who trained Osama and who did he work for?
Blaming Islam for 9/11 is like blaming christianity for the rot and pedophilia in the popedom. Or blaming you for colonialism.
Please, we studied Islam 20 years ago and we’ve moved on. Here’s my summary from 2005 with many hyperlinks. Take a few weeks and get back to me.
http://libertyandculture.blogspot.com/2005/12/islam-in-summary.html
No they are not The Biden administration are Radica Islamic and Zionists controlled. Stunning Here why is he not here with the other Jihadists’? Stunning!
Andrew Tate – despite any knack for making himself known – is a typical
thug. So Islam is perfect for him to discharge his contempt for women,
as well as giving his thug self the chance to dominate over Jews and
Christians and anyone who isn’t a Muslim.
I can imagine seeing Andrew Tate strutting around dressed in a Nazi uniform shouting our orders to the underlings.
Tate has contempt for women? Because he believes and says men have a duty to take care of them and they to respect men? How do you rather have women? Naked on the floor groping for single dollars bills as the western world’s clubs have them? That’s your “respect” for women?
The either-or fallacy the article talked about applies here, too. Have you read the article?
Just because the modern West is degenerate and Islam seems to offer some kind of of solution to that does not mean Islam is the only option or that it even is a good one and doesn’t have its own, far more terrible depravities.
A traditional Christian respects women more than Andrew Tate does, it doesn’t matter that there’s other people who disrespect women, it doesn’t automatically make Tate a saint.
“far more terrible depravities”
Again I ask, like? Saying things and making negative assertions does not create facts you know. Same done against Andrew, same now against Islam.
Again I ask directly, what is wrong with men protecting and catering to women and women respecting themselves (not being naked) and respecting society and their men?
As Andrew and Islam advocate.
Islam has killed 270 million people.
Far more than Stalin, Hitler and Mao combined.
This is the best and most trenchant peice Hill has ever written!
“Tate would never think of re-orienting western civilization with its Judeo-Christian heritage because contemporary Christianity in the West comes affixed with an unassailable gender equality clause that, under the precepts of liberalism which secure the sovereignty, autonomy, and liberty of each person, does not permit human bondage, domination, coercion, and ownership of persons as we find in the primitive world of Islam.”
The crucial word in this is “contemporary”. Because traditional, conservative, pure, consistent, medieval, Christianity was and is as brutally theocratic as Islam. And women in pure and consistent, medieval, Christianity were and are considered second-class citizens because they are the daughters of evil, disobedient, Eve who was more responsible than Adam for Original Sin and the Fall of Man.
Philosophers like Jason D. Hill, and writers like Dinesh D’Souza, Rodney Stark and Dennis Prager, are ultimately more dangerous to liberty, freedom, and capitalism, than morons like Andrew Tate. Because by evading and white washing the brutal theocratic nature and history of Christianity, they open the door for the consistent and serious Christians and a return to Christian theocracy.
“There are men today who advocate freedom and who recognize what ideas lie at its base, but who then counsel “practicality.” It is too late, they say, to educate people philosophically; we must appeal to what they already believe; we must pretend to endorse religion on strategic grounds, even if privately we don’t.
This is a counsel of intellectual dishonesty and of utter impracticality. It is too late indeed, far too late for a strategy of deception which by its nature has to backfire and always has, because it consists of confirming and supporting the very ideas that have to be uprooted and replaced. It is time to tell people the unvarnished truth: to stand up for man’s mind and this earth, and against any version of mysticism or religion. It is time to tell people: “You must choose between unreason and America. You cannot have both. Take your pick.”
If there is to be any chance for the future, this is the only chance there is.” – Objectivist philosopher Leonard Peikoff, “Religion versus America”
Which “Christians” have forced you to stop lying, cheating, stealing, and killing against your will?
You foul marxist stooges kill infants, push drugs, persecute and prosecute innocent people,
fund militant islamic terrorists, trap blacks in inner city slums . . .
And you whine about Christians?
Satan is the father of liars and haters.
More thumbs up for you. The rot. has so gathered it blocks their vision. Andrew, islam, true Judaism and Christianity and us can’t help them see. It’s too late. They are blind.
Very interesting Dr. Perry, very interesting.
I would not be surprised if in the future a syncretism occurs between Islam and Christianity. Or simply a political, strategic, alliance against capitalism, after capitalism is destroyed Christianity and Islam will fight each other to the death for power.
Because both evil belief-systems are based on a hatred of reality, reason, man and mankind, freedom, liberty, the personal pursuit of happiness on earth, and capitalism.
The true goal of monotheism and Marxism is to destroy the individual, to destroy his freedom, his happiness, his life.
“The encyclical is the voice of the Dark Ages, rising again in today’s intellectual vacuum, like a cold wind whistling through the empty streets of an abandoned civilization.
Unable to resolve a lethal contradiction, the conflict between individualism and altruism, the West is giving up. When men give up reason and freedom, the vacuum is filled by faith and force.
No social system can stand for long without a moral base. Project a magnificent skyscraper being built on quicksands: while men are struggling upward to add the hundredth and two-hundredth stories, the tenth and twentieth are vanishing, sucked under by the muck. That is the history of capitalism, of its swaying, tottering attempt to stand erect on the foundation of the altruist morality.
It’s either-or. If capitalism’s befuddled, guilt-ridden apologists do not know it, two fully consistent representatives of altruism do know it: Catholicism and communism.
Their rapprochement, therefore, is not astonishing. Their differences pertain only to the supernatural, but here, in reality, on earth, they have three cardinal elements in common: the same morality, altruism — the same goal, global rule by force — the same enemy, man’s mind.
There is a precedent for their strategy. In the German election of 1933, the communists supported the Nazis, on the premise that they could fight each other for power later, but must first destroy their common enemy, capitalism. Today, Catholicism and communism may well cooperate, on the premise that they will fight each other for power later, but must first destroy their common enemy, the individual, by forcing mankind to unite to form one neck ready for one leash.” – Ayn Rand
What was practiced in medieval times was not true Christianity, it was the rich using the church for their personal benefit. Nothing new under the sun.
Where can I find true Christianity please? Give an example….
True Islam is in Malaysia, Senegal, Indonesia, Iran, and so on…(Btw, these nations have more than half the world’s Muslims)
Now over to you…
In the heart and soul of the individual.
None of them are shiny examples of fairness, progress or civil rights. God protect us from your version of ideal society. I will take the imperfect Western society any time.
Always the same escape hatch, “True socialism has never been tried”, “True Christianity is a religion of peace”, “True Islam is only the good”.
But the devil is in the details, what PRECISELY does the Marxist, Christian, and Muslim define as “peace”, “virtue”, and the “good”?
But you’re not brave enough to criticise islam.
Are there any Muslims here at FPM claiming that Islam is a religion of freedom, liberty, and capitalism as there are Christians here at FPM who falsely claim the same about Christianity?
No there aren’t.
Other than you is there anyone on this site that claims Objectivism is a religion (and it is a religion for you) of freedom, liberty, and capitalism.
And you can’t prove that Christianity is not a source of freedom and capitalism. Instead of whing about 700 year old European religious wars tell us about how Christianity today is restricting my ability to be a free person….free to earn a living, or not, free to go to Church, or not, free to ridicule an obsessive compulsive like you.
Yes me. Now show me a single verse in the Quran that in context provides any thing other than the best example. The examples the founding fathers derived from in addition to utilizing the Bhagavad Gita and Bible to write the US constitution.
Even if that were the case, what do you think is more likely to happen? Hordes of Muslim immigrants are demanding sharia law on the streets of Europe, most Muslims asked in Ilhan Omar’s voting district stated they put the sharia above the constitution.
Radical Islam is being demanded by Islamic clergy, old men and aggressive young men, meanwhile fundamentalist Christianity is advocated for by a small minority of people, not nearly as powerful as the people who demand sharia and Islam in the West.
These people hate you and would kill you if they had the chance, Christians wouldn’t. Hope that your wishes do not come true as they might not turn out the way you planned.
So, I’m curious. Do you think when Christ returns he’s coming with flowers to place in the barrels of mens guns? Think again!
How about I simply choose America based on reason and patriotism and not worry about whether I am being “rationally selfish”
If you want to sit in your little hovel and worry about Jason D. Hill, and writers like Dinesh D’Souza, Rodney Stark and Dennis Prager “evading and white washing the brutal theocratic nature and history of Christianity”, that is your business. I ‘ve never seen such desperation in anyone……over nothing.
I do believe that some imaginary return to “serious Christians and a return to Christian theocracy” is your greatest fear and a fantasy of a damaged mind, because you fear what will happen to you. Your imaginary theocracy is simply a creation of your own fevered fantasies.
Is “George H. Smith” the verse in Quran “calling to violence unjustly?”
We are still waiting, possibly till eternity for the Quran verse(s). Sigh
Correct on all points about Andrew Tate.
DNGㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
And, unfortunately, Tate has always had a very weak chin. Not a good look (although he could clearly kill me with a single blow). :-/
Their the aiders and abettors of the violence of Islamic extremists their not willing to tell how they throw gays off the tops of tall buildings and the Honor Murders of Daughters
Tik Tok Boy
Likes little Girls to post for his BENIFIT
AJ Info Wars…FAIL
T. Carslon…FAIL
Peterson…FAIL
What did we leave out?
State of Romania
I am disturbed by a this person getting so much media attention. Im even more disturbed by the bizarre but classically delusional anti-Semitism from RFK.
Have we, the long suffering non-left people of America, gone so far off the deep end that we idealize grifters at the drop of a hat? Maybe thats what happens when courage, morality and heart is replaced by short attention spans.
I cant thank this author enough for this article. It is thorough and sensitive. I hope it served as a reminder that we ought to think first before we join any old bandwagon that will have us.
Tate is a POS, one of the biggest ones to come out of this island since politicians, in fact.
He fancies himself a ‘hard man’ who knows how ‘real men’ behave.
Speaking as a real woman, I say he is neither a hard man, a real man, or actually any kind of man.
I’ve scraped more appealing and attractive things off the bottom of my shoe. And I would be more than happy to stand face to face with him and tell him so. This ignorant, arrogant dink is not going to intimidate, frighten or shame any woman with an iota of self respect and a strong will.
As for him being a ‘feared opponent’ I don’t know a single person, male or female, who wouldn’t laugh in his face at such a stupid proclamation coming from the mouth of someone so obviously lacking in every aspect of his being. And he is not ‘virile’, quite the opposite. He is a desperate little poseur, who probably has an outsized prescription for the little blue pills.
All in all, it’s no surprise that he converted to islam, as a creature who lives and glories in the lowest levels of bestiality that human behaviour can descend to, it’s obviously a perfect fit.
A lot of misinformation here. Tate has a great relationship with his mother, he’s spoken about her on numerous occasions. He even sends her around 15 million dollars a year.
You’ve deliberately left out a key bit of information in your isis segment, you’ve also deliberately ignored the fact that he publicly apologised on that subject on Piers Morgans show.
He openly advocates to get strong and earn money and work your absolute hardest so you can take care of the ppl around you. Your kids and wife etc. Also you have no idea if whether or not he’s married. He certainly doesn’t have kids with random women. He’s spoken extremely positive on women multiple times and only advocate to stay away from low quality ppl both MEN and WOMEN.
Understand that he used to say true things in a very provocative way because he understood that the mentally pathetic ppl would boost engagement through the roof. What you’ve demonstrated in this article is that you know absolutely nothing about tate whatsoever. Your narrative is clear and pathetic.
Thank you Jamie for posting the one and only counter post to possibly the most biased and hateful post and responding comments I have ever read on FPM. Everything you say in your post is factual while almost everything else in this diatribe is supported by emotion and feelings. I suspect the reason Tate is hated so much is because his aggressiveness frightens so many people, both men and women. He is, after all, a kick boxer who has won numerous competitions. Andrew Tate is certainly not perfect, and he admits this continually. But Derangement Syndrome is not just limited to Donald Trump. Most conservatives are unfortunately more comfortable with the Mitt Romneys and Mitch McConnells of the world. These are the people with the real power, not Andrew Tate.
Liz Wheeler shows how Tate is the two-faced pimp. She shows clips of Tate in his own words describing how hi pimps women and fools men into handing over all their money to the women hi pimps.
I listened to the whole thing. Waste of time. There is no clip of Andrew in it. Did I miss it? Time point please? Thanks
In this articulate piece, Mr Hill comes off as a balanced and well versed writer.
What’s this “real men” you speak? The Top G is the pinnacle of what women are attracted to.
You sound so utterly clueless that you must not be straight.
Excellent article that deep dives this demonstrated liar, charlatan., and fraud.
The the legitimacy Tate is getting from conservative voices, more specifically Tucker Carlson, is troubling.
Certainly it’s fine for a journalist to interview a controversial subject, but to be fawning sycophant is ridiculous and puzzling. The standard disclaimer of “I don’t agree with everything he says” is a pathetic move. with such an obvious malicious actor like Tate.
As described in the article, it’s not difficult to discern Tate’s overwhelmingly destructive views. I liken him to a Manson, Jones, or Koresh. All of whom would have liked had large You Tube followings.
DNGㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
Just Parachute this miserable little weasel into the Amazon with only the clothes on his back
Nice article Jason, thanks!
Andrew Tate is giving us the morbid pleasure of a troubled psychological case study right before our eyes.
From his ability to trigger emotion from all sides of the aisle in these snippets, these tiny windows of expression is truly remarkable. Has everyone lost their temperament? Well yes, yes they have and likely perspective too.
Tate’s longer form therapy sessions betray the scared, frightened and under-loved little boy inside that had to create his TOP G, super-hero alter-ego to protect him. To get strong, to get rich, to get girls and be all the things scared little Andrew wishes he could be.
It’s the classic tale, bullied boy at school who the girls don’t like becomes a fighter and club bouncer, enjoys violent sex is generally aggressive and more than anything craves, no survives on attention.
Every man he calls pathetic is payback for the fatherly tenderness he never received, Every contorted face, B-word and attempted choke (his admission), is payback for this quiet nerdy chess boy’s invisibility to girls growing up.
Let’s not be too quick to jump on Tate, (the courts will take care of any wrong doing he may or may not have done, the justice process needs to play out) rather let us marvel at what can only be described as the highest profile undiagnosed case of dissociative identity disorder. playing out in real time before our eyes.
I only hope the denouement is not a Shakespearean tragedy but it does have a whiff of either death, imprisonment or weeping apology about it. Let’s hope it’s the one where people get harmed the least.
England should never have allowed Islam to get established in their country. Now the consequences will have to be endured by the English people.
Jason D. Hill.
DO ANY RESREACH AT ALL ON HIM AND TRY AGAIN, ffs you latterly watched snippets of out context ticktoks, go watch the fucking things then you will realise UH OH your wrong, you couldn’t be less informed, do even read more then news titles your self?
Liz Wheeler shows how Tate is a two-faced pimp. She shows clips of Tate in his own words describing how hi pimps women and fools men into handing over all their money to the women hi pimps.
Who’s Andrew Tate?
See also:
“A Biblical Response to Andrew Tate”, by Allie Beth Stuckey
“Andrew Tate is a Weak Man”, by Samuel Sey
https://www.christianpost.com/voices/andrew-tate-is-a-weak-man.html
“Why Young Men Listen To Andrew Tate”, by Matt Walsh
“Matt Walsh Responds To Andrew Tate Supporters”
“Why I Changed My Mind on Andrew Tate”
Andrew Tate and Tucker Carlson’s Lies EXPOSED”, by David Wood and Apostate Prophet
Collision w/ James White: Andrew Tate vs Christian Scholar
“Matt Walsh Responds To Andrew Tate Supporters”
Andrew in almost all his speeches says “your women” or “your wife”.
Matt did not really critique Andrew. He only emphasized a point he wants Andrew to sound out louder.
He is the only of these I deem worthy of watching.
Religion is the most destructive force in human society. It is responsible for more death, suffering and enslavement than any other human endeavor. It promotes itself through fear and punishment While it supposedly promotes freedom, the only freedom it promotes is from it’s own inflicted guilt and the heretofore unknown doctrinal violations. You end up serving an even greater oppressor. So basically, you exchange personal freedom for enslavement to their dogma.
It also seems to bring meaning to people’s lives but hey let’s not worry about that.
I think you’ll find that atheism has a more lurid history: Pol Pot, Stalin, Moa-tse tung, Hitler etc caused more death in one century than in all previous centuries;.thanks to Darwins tuition on eugenics!
I’ve been following Andrew Tate for a while and whilst I agree with a lot of what he says, I still like to listen and read on what others have to say about him (good and bad) to see if there are others that may debunk or prove Andrew Tate wrong of his message to young men.
Such as,
– be a good member of society
– be better than what you are today
– you are responsible for your actions (good or bad)
– if you feel sorry for yourself, go to the gym and make yourself better;
– and many more
I must say that there’s a lot of inaccuracies in your article and you haven’t really covered the true message on why (as you say) Islamization of Britain is happening right now.
Your article spews of titillating array of vocabulary foreplay in an attempt to sound very professional justifying your position as a Professor of Philosophy. Unfortunately, that is all there is to it. A vocabulary salad of a mixture of words without substance.
Whilst statistically, you may find that the majority of radicals are of Muslim faith, it doesn’t mean, and I don’t think all Muslims are radicals. I am of Christian faith and I have Muslim friends and know many others. None of them are radicals. It is only when articles such as yours are written that hyper sensitize an already sensitive subject.
Your article appears nothing but a “hit piece” on Tate because if you really think about it – the reasons why these are happening right now in the West (in this case Britain) is because of the governed policies enacted long before Andrew Tate became famous.
Whether it was Tate or somebody else – this is inevitable.
Islamists like Tate aren’t my friend.
Anyone with an understanding of Islamic history will know that.
America’s first war after gaining independence was against Islam. As was its second.
Islam is the ideology of death.
Wow, how can a professor in philosophy, who specializes in ethics (!) be that racist and ignorant. It is people like that who deserve to be cancelled and deprived of any platform to spread his/her/their hate.
Andrew and Tristan aren’t twin brothers
Nothing about tate is authentic, he appears to me to be a very low self esteemed person, looking for attention any way possible. Everything about him is a lie, even possibly his “jail time”
Andrew Tate exemplifies Eric Hoffer’s maxim “Rudeness is the weak man’s imitation of strength.”