Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
[Order David Horowitz’s new book, America Betrayed, HERE.]
“I have one job and that’s to beat Donald Trump,” Joe Biden told Democrat donors on July 8. We’re done talking about the debate. It’s time to put Trump in the bullseye.” Five days later at a rally in Pennsylvania, a roof-top gunman – undetected by the Secret Service – fired a shot that wounded presidential candidate Donald Trump and would have killed the former president if he had not suddenly turned his head.
Democrats had previously attempted to imprison Trump, drive him into bankruptcy, and have his name removed from state ballots. The Democrats also compared Trump to Hitler, portrayed him as an existential threat to democracy, and attempted to deny him Secret Service protection. According to coincidence theory, there could be no progression from these hostile measures to the assassination attempt on July 13. From the start, establishment media played it down.
Fox News and CNN reported “loud bangs” at the Trump rally, and according to CBS News Trump “says bullet struck his ear,” so the shot was just another Trump claim to “fact check.” For the Sacramento Bee, Trump was “fine” after “shots fired at stage during Pennsylvania campaign rally.” So the stage was the target, not the former president of the United States. It was as though Lee Harvey Oswald had targeted the Lincoln convertible, not president JFK in particular.
For the Associated Press, Trump was “injured,” as though some accident had occurred, and it was only an “apparent assassination attempt.” The FBI joined the investigation, and according to the New York Times, the bureau was trying to determine “whether an assassin’s bullet — or potential debris — grazed former President Donald J. Trump’s head, bloodying his ear.” In all the confusion, the House Judiciary Committee requested testimony from FBI director Christopher Wray.
“With respect to former President Trump, there’s some question about whether or not it’s a bullet or shrapnel that hit his ear,” testified Wray, who was never an FBI agent. No word whether any shrapnel was involved in the death of Corey Comperatore, or “potential debris” in the wounds to David Dutch and James Copenhaver. According to coincidence theorists, this was not an attempt to downplay what was clearly an assassination attempt.
Wray’s “shrapnel” statement was hard to top but FBI deputy director Paul Abbate said the shooter’s motive was “still not clear.” This was not an attempt to minimize the reality that, to all but the willfully blind, the shooter’s motive was to kill Donald Trump.
The FBI bosses brought along no ballistics or firearms experts and no profiler revealed whether Thomas Matthew Crooks had been on their radar. According to coincidence theory, the secrecy had nothing to do with the FBI hiding evidence about the shooter, as in the murders of DNC operative Seth Rich and DNC whistleblower Philip Haney. In those cases, the FBI has yet to announce suspects.
Biden Secret Service director Kimberly Cheatle was unable to explain how a 20-year-old with no tactical experience was able to gain a clear shot at Trump. Cheatle claimed the gently sloped roof so easily accessed by the shooter was a “safety factor” and wanted a 60-day investigation before revealing any details. Cheatle knew how many shell casings were found on the roof, but would not reveal the number. For coincidence theorists, this stonewalling could not be an attempt to hide the truth about the assassination attempt.
Cheatle resigned and acting SS director Ronald Rowe told a Senate panel he wanted to determine “if there was more than one person who perhaps exercised bad judgment,” but no agent should be “unfairly persecuted.” Sen. Josh Hawley wanted to know how many people Rowe had fired. Rowe wasn’t saying, and he wouldn’t provide names of SS agents in key posts on July 13. According to the prevailing theory, this was all coincidental and could have nothing to do with any coverup.
Joe Biden, who said it was time to “put Trump in the bull’s eye,” directed Department of Homeland Security boss Alejandro Mayorkas to assemble an “independent security review” of the attempted assassination of Donald Trump on July 13. The reviewers included Janet Napolitano, a curious choice.
During her stint as Obama’s Department of Homeland Security boss, Napolitano expunged the word “terrorism” from the DHS lexicon and purged experts showing the connection between terrorism and Islamic jihad. On Napolitano’s watch, the DHS put out Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment, a sweeping indictment of those who champion limited government, individual rights and the Constitution.
Napolitano claimed that the border was more secure than ever when it wasn’t, attacked state efforts to step up enforcement, and ridiculed the idea of a border wall. Her tenure at DHS, said Sen. Jeff Sessions, was “defined by a consistent disrespect for the rule of law.” For coincidence theorists, Mayorkas’ inclusion of this partisan Democrat signaled no intent to downplay or cover up the attempted assassination of Donald Trump. The inclusion of Bush officials Frances Townsend and Mark Filip, along with Maryland State Police superintendent David Mitchell, supposedly makes for a bipartisan review but the people have cause to wonder.
A congressional task force has been assembled to understand what went wrong, ensure accountability, and “prevent such an agency failure from happening again.” In the meantime, it’s all about memory against forgetting.
John Anderson says
As former USSS agent Dan Bongino first pointed out, if the USSS was aware of a “guy on the roof with a rifle” near where Trump was to speak before 6:02 PM, then why did the USSS let Trump out on stage at 6:02 PM. Or when the counter snipers were aiming their rifles at the would-be assassin before the would-be assassin actually shot the bullets at 6:11 PM, why were the USSS agents not rushing the stage to protect Trump and get him to safety?
The counter snipers can be seen on video on a roof above where Trump was speaking, aiming their rifles at the would-be assassin, but only firing their rifles immediately AFTER the would-be assassin fired first. Was the story supposed to be Trump killed by assassin, and the USSS then immediately shoots assassin? Then the Fake News could pretend how sad the Democrats are but at least the USSS agents immediately shot the assassin after Trump was killed.
Democrats certainly would not want Trump prevented from taking the stage BEFORE the “guy on the roof with a rifle” could be apprehended, or Trump taken off the stage BEFORE the “guy on the roof with a rifle” had time to shoot, or for the counter snipers to shoot and kill the would-be assassin BEFORE the would-be assassin actually shot at Trump.
Proof the 2024 election was stolen would be if radical, anti-American Kamala and “Tampon Tim” win.
May Donald J Trump win the election for president (for a third time). MAGA!
KER says
At first I did not want to believe our own government would be involved with assassinating Donald Trump. However, it’s to the point now where our government needs to prove beyond reasonable doubt it was not involved.
Under Biden America has reached dictator staus.
Tionico says
Having dlved deeply into a prior event of some notoriety and from some time back (I won’t name the event but some related terms are “grassy knoll”, Texas School book Depository”, “6,5 Carcano”, and “Zapruder”) there is not one nanoparticle of doubt that our own FedGov are fully capable of staging this event. The only “plus sude” to this event over the one referenced above is that the FedGov’s level of incompetence has been well honed in the intervening six decades. And for that I now thank my God frequently.
In the earlier incident referenced above, FedGov had worked out carefully every detail ahead, established back up and cintiengency plans, was aboe to instatny pivot and respond to “surprises” (tht film mentioned above was politely taken into custody “for safekeeping” and to p”preserve the chain of custody”, but was then whicked off to the ONLY facility in the world with the capability to do so, and was seriously altered before being shown to the population at large. Recent frame by frame analisis proves the modifications were indeed performed, but at the time a grieving America never asked any “troubling” questions and so it became “fact”.
In the six decades since that earlier success, our FedGov have deteriorated drastically, and their present level of incompetence is almost hilarious. They are SO blatantly obvious in their cover moves….
How the mighty have fallen, so deeply into the hole they dug for us. Reminds me of the ancient bigwig that advised the king ti build the gallows for his “enemy” but once the truth was out, the “enemy” as found to be friend… and the bigwig was hanged upn the gallows intended for his falsely accused rival. Justice WILL out, eventually.
Blackdog says
The classic catchall phrase that has never been attacked is “we were aware of ……….”. They never address the most important portion of the sentence. WERE AWARE. When were they aware? Before or after the information was brought up by a third party? A year ago? A month ago? Or when you showed it to them? Past tense is great without a reference point. I am sure there has been a lot of scurrying around after they WERE AWARE of information brought to their attention.
The only thing that will clear this up is a guillotine used a few times. No consequences rewards evil and incompetence.
Aristotle Cam says
Where’s Comer and Jordan??? They’re part of Swamp! Wave their arms, hold their Congressional committees. And
what have they ever done??? CRICKETS!!! Their job is to put us to sleep by thinking -Yeah the cavalry is here we’re
saved. And we all go to sleep!
Jerry says
This conspiracy is so much more believable and likely than any I’ve heard about in my 70 plus years. And conspiracy is NOT in quotes.
Ann peters says
The only reason Cheatle and Rowe are not charged and being held at Guantanamo is because the number of Congress members (Republicans and Democrats) who signed off on this inside assassination is too numerous to list. They didn’t anticipate it might fail. Our government hates us. Beware of them all.
Grey Beard says
Superb factual summary! This tragic episode goes beyond, “You can’t make this up!” And on the 50th Anniversary of Nixon’s resignation from office., it’s become clear that the President was set up by the then Deep State.
Bryan Taplits says
I’d like to think this wasn’t a conspiracy, but:
1) They said that those who believed that Trump was innocent of Russian Collusion and the swamp was out to get him. Those who believed that were denominated conspiracy theorists.
But then it was proved that there indeed was no Russian Collusion. Hillary & the Dem. Party had paid to fly that rumor. 2) Then the FBI issued FISA’s-using knowingly false information to get the warrant. Then the main stream media (MSM) refused to acknowledge their false and slanderous headlines where they had accused Trump of Russian Collusion. 3)The NYTimes, the Washington Post and others have yet to apologize to the former President.
4) Of course we all know of the lawfare that was and is used to destroy Trump and his finances. And this was done-most likely at the behest of the Biden Administration-contracting the “The Justice Department” to fulfill the contract on Trump.
5)Then came the impeachments (both of which were defamation masquerading as righteous indignation). Many of the strutting Democrats who accused and slandered Trumps honor and name were protected by the MSM and Congressional Rules from paying for their defamations.
6) Finally, Trump was accused of inciting an insurrection. However, no one-except the police-brought guns to the “insurrection”. And the only gun shot fatality was by a policeman who shot and killed a former air force soldier, Ashli Babbit.
Summing all these equations, I would think those who aren’t conspiracy theorists are either blind fools or are Washingtonian swamp rats !
Robert L. Kahlcke says
His Mother must be so proud. NOT!
Aldomeir says
Which failure are they trying to investigate – the failure to protect President Trump or the failure to assassinate (by USSS) President Trump.?
Algorithmic Analyst says
Thanks Lloyd!!! Reminds me of the Philip Haney case.
T100C1970 says
Dementia Joe sez: If I’d meant to shoot Trump, I would have said cross hairs and not bulls eye !!!
Dr. Don Rhudy says
Here was another National Government assassination that, fortunately, failed. The Government will have to try again. The Government modus is this: It finds someone who is planning to assassinate the President and joins him, making him their Patsy or Fall Guy. In this case Crooks, who from all all the evidence had been preparing to shoot Trump for nearly a year. In the previous cases of JFK and RFK Government put its own shooters in position to make certain the attempt succeeded if the Fall Guys, Lee Harvey Oswald and Sirhan Sirhan failed, or if they succeeded and then needed to be rubbed out. In this present case the Secret Service made sure Crooks had access to a shooting lane and that their own snipers had access to Crooks. With the President down behind the podium the Government shooter had no choice but to kill Crooks.
Cat says
Did Austin investments really short DJT stock one day before the attempt for 12 million shares and then was it called a clerical error and removed by the SEC? So they didn’t lose money. If that happened, theres no chance this was not planned. And you know how the DC elites love money and insider trading.
Also given the Google and facebook censorship of the assassination attempt story and pictures swiftly afterward- that makes big tech seem like they were either in on it or knew those who were. Thats not a neutral functioning search engine or social media platform. They censored a momentous historical event and amazing pictures associated with it. That censorship is evidence of further malice an perhaps a conspiracy.