
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
On July 7th, 2005, three Muslim terrorists set off bombs on trains and a bus, killing 52 people and wounding over 700 others.
Qatar’s Al Jazeera broadcast videos by the terrorists declaring that their motivation was Islam.
A few weeks later, four Muslim terrorists tried to carry out further attacks.
But if you look at the statements by King Charles and PM Keir Starmer (who previously had people arrested for even tweeting about Islamic terrorism), there is no mention of who did it. That’s like commemorating the Battle of Britain without ever mentioning whom they were fighting.
King Charles described the 7/7 attacks as “tragic” and ” terrible” and finally “senseless acts of evil.”
There was nothing “senseless” or random about them.
PM Starmer claimed that “those who tried to divide us failed. We stood together then, and we stand together now— against hate and for the values that define us of freedom, democracy and the rule of law.”
These are the same generic statements that we now tend to hear about 9/11 and all Islamic terrorism. Vague mentions of “evil”, the “trauma and suffering” of the victims and tributes to the “heroism” of the rescue workers. Nothing to tell the public what happened and what’s coming next.
At least Biden actually mentioned the word “terrorists” in his 2024 statement on 9/11. Starmer and Charlie couldn’t even seem to manage to do that.
Excellent coverage and analysis.
One person’s terrorist is another person’s freedom fighter, eh?
Charles. His jug ears rival Brokeback Hasbeen Osama’s. He isn’t a real king, he’s a limp pud.
WTH is wrong w Cucker Tarlson & his infatuation w Islamo commies?
Psst !!!! You can’t mention “The Protected Species” or aka as “The Religion of Peace”