|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
On July 7th, 2005, three Muslim terrorists set off bombs on trains and a bus, killing 52 people and wounding over 700 others.
Qatar’s Al Jazeera broadcast videos by the terrorists declaring that their motivation was Islam.
A few weeks later, four Muslim terrorists tried to carry out further attacks.
But if you look at the statements by King Charles and PM Keir Starmer (who previously had people arrested for even tweeting about Islamic terrorism), there is no mention of who did it. That’s like commemorating the Battle of Britain without ever mentioning whom they were fighting.
King Charles described the 7/7 attacks as “tragic” and ” terrible” and finally “senseless acts of evil.”
There was nothing “senseless” or random about them.
PM Starmer claimed that “those who tried to divide us failed. We stood together then, and we stand together now— against hate and for the values that define us of freedom, democracy and the rule of law.”
These are the same generic statements that we now tend to hear about 9/11 and all Islamic terrorism. Vague mentions of “evil”, the “trauma and suffering” of the victims and tributes to the “heroism” of the rescue workers. Nothing to tell the public what happened and what’s coming next.
At least Biden actually mentioned the word “terrorists” in his 2024 statement on 9/11. Starmer and Charlie couldn’t even seem to manage to do that.
Excellent coverage and analysis.
One person’s terrorist is another person’s freedom fighter, eh?
Charles. His jug ears rival Brokeback Hasbeen Osama’s. He isn’t a real king, he’s a limp pud.
Did they give out participation medals at the end of that name-calling, gay-joke training session?
you are easily distracted and go off topic
Yes, I got a Gold Ribbon. What did you get? A participation Award?
Homo.
The Communists call their subsidized terrorists “freedom fighters” as of course you know already 🙂
starmer and charles are apologists for the worlds worst terror cult . charles is a witless nonce and starmer an imbecile of the highest order . charles got the job because of family connections , starmer because the witless voters want to destroy the country along with their co- cult terrorist friends they call the religion of peace . now that they have got what they wanted they wont want what they get . the voters have become part of the problem not the solution .
That pretty sums up the situation and the useless personalities involved. They refuse to state the obvious , thus there will never be a solution. R.I.P. Britain……
R I p england 925-2024
King Chuck & the little bitch Starmer basically said the equivalent of “some people did some theeng”.
(The chickenshit site FactCheck.org did their best to obfuscate Rep. Omar’s remarks being “said in passing” & then cried about “islamophobia” and death threats from extreme right.)
The gutless pricks Chuck & Starmer don’t just bend the knee to the islamist leeches; they whore themselves out as islam’s enforcers.
If any dare mention the brazen & systematic rape of little girls in Rotterham, or Axel Rudakubana stabbing little girls for Allah, Starmer will send six bobbies to knock on your door.
WanKeir here in uk.
Even though he is supposed to be the head of the Church of England, KIng Charles has always had an admiration for and been an apologist for Islam. Muslims have begun to pray at Westminster Abbey, even though there are over 500 mosques in London, Muslims were allowed to pray on the grounds of Westminster Abbey, the most sacred site in the Anglican Church. Muslims are already permitted to hold prayers in the House of Lords and the Commons Westminster Hall.
The Islamistaion of Britain continues apace….and ever more rapidly with every dinghy escorted across the Channel by the UK Border Force and RNLI.
WTH is wrong w Cucker Tarlson & his infatuation w Islamo commies?
He uses it to hide his antisemitism and hatred of Israel.
I used to like that guy, even though I’ve never met him. What happened to him?
Psst !!!! You can’t mention “The Protected Species” or aka as “The Religion of Peace”
Some people did something? Maybe Charles was afraid he would get arrested if he mentioned who actually was responsible.
It is truly a tragedy that Queen Elizabeth never had the opportunity to read her idiot son’s obituary.
Elizabeth had enough trials. I know what you mean, but I am glad she is not here to see this.
If she had read his obituary, William would be King and nobody would have had to call Chuck King., or Camilla Queen.. A pair of horseback idiots if there ever was one.
She volunteered during WWII, you know . She worked on trucks. A REAL Queen.
No one remembers anything any more. During the Princess Diana days, “King” then Prince Charles was audio tape-recorded secretly while leaving a voice mail for Camilla his then mistress now “Queen”. The King of England said to Camilla:
“I want to be a tampax in your body”.
Doesn’t anyone remember this “scandal”? It was all over the news for months in the 1990s. Maybe Americans missed it since you were dealing with Bill Clinton’s humiliation at having his penis size and shape graphically described in a public court of law. The ’90s truly were a hilarious decade.
How can anyone look at that goon faced Islam-convert traitor to Britain low IQ cretin loser freak “tampax in your body” buffoon and not demand he get the same fate as Charles 1st. And then confiscate all “royal” property and bank accounts and end this farce of “monarchy” forever!
I remember that it was lampooned on SNL.
The milquetoast fool is ongoing proof that royalty only reflects privilege; not necessarily character.
Defender of the Faith ? Not so much.
Unless you count that he’s an ardent defender of the islamic faith.
Muslim child-rape gangs roam unchecked.
Christian ladies quietly praying in front of an abortion clinic find themselves pacing inside the Tower.
I do not like Charles, but he has a quandary. He is a figurehead king, with no real duties other than symbolic. He cannot arouse his people to war, nor can he direct an army. But he can and should at least speak on their behalf and most especially when they are under constant threat and attack. What could the government do? Nothing.
As it is, he speaks of the vague post-war universal egalitarianism and democracy that is the cause of worldwide destruction of only one peculiar people – his people in the lands of his ancestors. In doing this, he is treasonously complicit in the destruction of his people and eventually his throne. Does he think the caliphate will tolerate him or any of his progeny?
He reminds me of Hezekiah in 2 Kings 20: 16:
“Then Isaiah said to Hezekiah, ‘Hear the word of the LORD: 17 The time will surely come when everything in your palace and all that your fathers have stored up until this day will be carried off to Babylon. Nothing will be left, says the LORD. 18 And some of your descendants, your own flesh and blood, will be taken away to be eunuchs in the palace of the king of Babylon.’
19 But Hezekiah said to Isaiah, ‘The word of the LORD that you have spoken is good.’ For he thought, ‘Will there not at least be peace and security in my lifetime?’ “
Chaz the turd is not worthy to lick Hezekiah’s sandal.
Agreed. I love Hezekiah, too. The Word of the LORD does not shy away from revealing the flaws of its heroes. Very few come out unscathed, but Daniel is one of them. Ezra and Nehemiah also unscathed.
Even good king Joash had Jehoiadah’s son Zechariah murdered. Jehoiadah who protected him from Athaliah and others when he was a little child!
If my life were put on trial, I would not be unscathed.
Eh, we all have our flaws. I don’t give a shit though, and you shouldn’t either. I’m saving my excuses for St Peter.
King Charles III is proving to be a total loser unlike the past he is proving to be King Charles the Wimp
Wasn’t there some kind of Queen Mary link?
Google AI query: king charles, queen mary, islam, mohamad:
Note its interesting how the AI reply varies depending on the level of misspelling of muhammad.
“Including results for king charles, queen mary, islam, muhammad
Search only for king charles, queen mary, islam, mohamad
AI Overview
King Charles III and Islam
King Charles III, while not a Muslim, has consistently shown a strong interest and admiration for Islam and Muslim communities. He has spoken publicly on numerous occasions about the positive aspects of Islam and the valuable contributions of Muslim communities to British society. Some examples of his engagement include: ”
Ignore the Google AI censorship and check out the articles (all ignored by Google AI for the sake of censorship) below the AI B.S. (but regarding idiot Charles) factually true.
Special bonus link, How Can I be Sure:
Dumb Cluck King Chucky plays dress up with the imams?
It’s high time British citizens cease funneling their taxes for a figurehead monarchy!
If you do not acknowledge the perpetrators of evil, you probably will never defeat it.
King Charles’ behaviour has always been foppish. A real king would not be affraid to call out evil.
King Charles III is the opposite of King Richard the Lionheart
The only REAL MAN in UK is Tommy Robinson. He has called out the Pakistani grooming gangs who are given free rein to brutalize, rape and forcibly drug-addict young White girls from poor homes and pimp them out on the streets to make money for the gangs. It has gone on openly for years, but Tommy Robinson is thrown in Solitary Confinement away from his family when he says a word about it ! Cops do nothing, Parliament does nothing and the Royals? Just endless fodder for trashy newspapers, that also say nothing. Young Princess Charlotte, age ten, will read about this someday and ask her Daddy, Charles and Grandpa, Phillip ” Why didn’t you help those girls and Tommy Robinson ?! ” She is, after all, Diana’s Granddaughter and just might have some spunk…..
It’s because it was mi6 that did it. the accused showed up late which exposed the entire thing. read terror on the tube for all the evidence. just like 9/11, it was a total inside job.