I’ve expressed my thoughts on Herschel Walker and some of the celebrity candidates and vanity projects who may lose the Senate this cycle before. But what’s really shameless are the media operatives belonging to the “Abortion is a Sacrament” party waxing self-righteous.
No one takes a backseat to “pro-choice pastor” Raphael Warnock on abortion.
The Democrats’ “Abortion for All Act” would “enshrine into federal law abortion on demand until the moment of birth” and prevent states from “protecting children from abortion based on their sex, race,” or even for simply being diagnosed with Down Syndrome. Despite 85 percent of Americans wanting limits on abortion and 80 percent believing that third-trimester abortions should be illegal, Raphael Warnock voted to remove any limits on abortions.
Obviously, the media doesn’t believe abortion is wrong. Abortion is getting the gay rights treatment where the media focused on ‘outing’ Republicans who were allegedly gay. The issue was supposedly the hypocrisy. Hypocrisy is an easy enough ‘own’. Especially in matters of vice. It’s not a non-issue, but upholding the abuse as a normative state itself is a good deal worse. Double standards are corrosive, but they’re still better than no standards.
Democrats and their media have spent two generations asking Republicans if they would sign off on an abortion if their daughter got pregnant. Democrats opposed to the death penalty or gun ownership were not similarly asked if they would pull the trigger on a serial killer who had just massacred a bus full of nuns. But the question is worthless either way.
The measure of whether an act is right or wrong isn’t whether someone engages in it. Morality is not invalidated by deviations. Rather it demonstrates why morality is necessary.
Hypocrisy, the difference between private and public morals, undermines morality, but it’s a far lesser threat than those who would eliminate it entirely.
Given the issues facing citizens of this country, and even beyond today, I simply don’t care that much about the personal life or history of foibles of a candidate. And I don’t like smears.
Most of us vote for the better of two candidates. Most of us believe that we either vote overwhelmingly this time or maybe never again have a chance to have any representation.
The rest of the people may react to tabloid smears. .
Despite the fact that the last sentence makes no sense, the point you make here is important and legitimate. Let’s hope you keep it in mind next time you plan on personally smearing your political opponents (which you do on a regular basis).
The last sentence makes perfect sense to anybody with morals and how can he smear the anti American Dirtbagocrat hypocites, liars and cheats with the truth?
With”The LameStreams”this would Largely depend upon what day it was,or which way the Wind was blowing???