Serious liberal&nbsp;legal scholars have been willing to admit that Roe v. Wade was indefensible on legal and constitutional grounds. The only reason that it, like a number of past and present Supreme Court decisions existed, was to safeguard a cultural lifestyle of a politically influential minority.


	Justice Alito's strong medicine draft dismantling the constitutional legitimacy Roe v. Wade was already widely distributed. "The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision, including the one on which the defenders of Roe and Casey now chiefly rely—the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment," he blasts.


	He's right, of course.


	And despite the harassment, threats, and intimidation, and even an assassination plot, Justice Roberts joined the conservative majority to abort Roe v. Wade.


	&nbsp;"The nine Members of this Court will no longer decide the basic legality of pre-viability abortion for all 330 million Americans. That issue will be resolved by the people and their representatives in the democratic process in the States or Congress," Justice Kavanaugh notes in his concurrence.


	The Democrats keep talking about "democracy" (it's in their name after all) and castigating any opposition to them as a "threat to democracy" or even more militantly, an "attack on democracy", and yet they violently resist the idea that the abortion question should be decided by the voters.


	The Supreme Court didn't take away abortion from anyone. It didn't mandate anything on abortion. It correctly ruled that was an ideological invention and that there's no special basis for federal protections for abortion.


	If, as lefties insist, abortion is enormously popular, they should be able to ride to victory in the midterms on a populist tide, increase their hold on the Senate and House, and easily win the White House again in 2024 while holding sufficient numbers to rig the Supreme Court, add abortion to the Constitution, and anything else they like.


	Except that the polls show no such tide and the midterms are the Republicans to lose (and in Pennsylvania, Ohio and Georgia, they're trying very hard to lose the Senate all over again thanks to political consultants and celebrity candidates that make RINOs look conservative). Despite the Days of Rage and pink hat brigade hysteria, Americans are not on board with abortion until birth or especially enthusiastic about abortion. Despite making a great deal of inroads on social issues, so that Republicans have largely abandoned them for generic culture wars, abortion does abide because there is very clearly a life being snuffed out.


	The Democrats need a federal mandate for abortion precisely because they know how unpopular it is. They're the ones who have been waging a war on democracy over it. And that's why they're hysterical over losing the ability to use central judicial control to force abortion on states and communities.


	Who hates democracy more than Planned Parenthood?

Supreme Court Turns Over Abortion Question to the People. Democrats Rage Against Democracy.

Serious liberal&nbsp;legal scholars have been willing to admit that Roe v. Wade was indefensible on legal and constitutional grounds. The only reason that it,

Supreme Court Turns Over Abortion Question to the People. Democrats Rage Against Democracy.

A crisis requires a perpetual atmosphere of fear and the insistence that things are getting worse and worse all the time.


	"We have already poisoned the atmosphere, we have to repair and heal the Earth and the only way to do that is to remove carbon dioxide permanently," Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm&nbsp;bizarrely claimed as part of Biden's 'Earthshot" to destroy America's economy and turn the rest of it over to Communist China.


	Bud Bromley <a href="https://rclutz.com/2022/06/16/nature-erases-pulses-of-human-co2-emissions/">makes an important point</a> in his analysis of CO2 levels.


	As <a href="https://rclutz.com/2022/06/16/nature-erases-pulses-of-human-co2-emissions/">Ron Clutz summarizes</a>, "Those committed to blaming humans for rising atmospheric CO2 sometimes admit that emitted CO2 (from any source) only stays in the air about 5 years (20% removed each year)&nbsp; being absorbed into natural sinks.&nbsp; But they then save their belief by theorizing that human emissions are “pulses” of additional CO2 which persist even when particular molecules are removed, resulting in higher CO2 concentrations.&nbsp; The analogy would be a traffic jam on the freeway which persists long after the blockage is removed."


	"A <a href="https://budbromley.blog/2022/06/11/a-conservative-calculation-of-specific-impulse-for-co2/">recent study </a>by Bud Bromley puts the fork in this theory.&nbsp; His paper is&nbsp;A conservative calculation of specific impulse for CO2."


	&nbsp;"In the 2 years following the June 15, 1991 eruption of the Pinatubo volcano, the natural environment removed more CO2&nbsp;than the entire increase in CO2&nbsp;concentration due to all sources, human and natural, during the entire measured daily record of the Global Monitoring Laboratory of NOAA/Scripps Oceanographic Institute (MLO)&nbsp;May 17, 1974 to June 15, 1991.&nbsp; Then, in the 2 years after that, that CO2&nbsp;was replaced plus an additional increment of CO2," Bromley notes.


	Bromley's paper<a href="https://budbromley.blog/2022/06/11/a-conservative-calculation-of-specific-impulse-for-co2/"> points out that</a>, "In this conservative calculation, based entirely on measurements (not theory, not models, and not estimates), Earth’s environment demonstrated the capacity to absorb more than 25 times the not-to-exceed amount of human CO2&nbsp;emissions at that time.&nbsp; The units drop out of the comparative calculation to yield a dimensionless 25 times ratio. (The units for J and F are not precisely correct in this novel use of the specific impulse calculation which would usually include a distance. It is important to keep the units the same in the comparison, as is done here.)"

<blockquote>
	
		"During the global cooling event in the 2 years following the Pinatubo eruption, CO2&nbsp;concentration decelerated rapidly.&nbsp; Following that 2 year period, in the next 2 years CO2&nbsp;accelerated more rapidly than it had declined, reaching an average CO2&nbsp;slope which exceeded MLO-measured slope for the period prior to the June 1991 Pinatubo eruption.&nbsp; The maximum force of the environment to both absorb and emit CO2&nbsp;could be much larger than the 25 times human emission and could occur much faster.&nbsp; We do not know the maximum force or specific impulse.&nbsp; But it is very safe to infer from this result that human CO2&nbsp;emissions are not an environmental crisis."

	
		"If a reason exists that the natural environment responds to human CO2&nbsp;in a significantly different way, e.g., the commonly asserted belief that the environment absorbs half of human CO2, then the reader is invited to put forth that theory.&nbsp; The calculations and data presented here disprove that theory."
</blockquote>


	It's a good point that isn't likely to met with any kind of coherent response. Bromley's argument is important and a reminder that this is a manufactured crisis that is being used to massively enrich some investors while impoverishing millions, and that is being used as a vehicle to radically transform society, that claims to have science on its side, when it actually does not.

Demolishing the Infinite CO2 Argument

A crisis requires a perpetual atmosphere of fear and the insistence that things are getting worse and worse all the time.


	"We have already poisoned the

Demolishing the Infinite CO2 Argument

Stacey Abrams Was For Defunding Police Before She Was Against It

What a difference a few years and a massive crime wave make.


	
		CAMEROTA: And so that leads us to the larger conversation that we've been having for

Stacey Abrams Was For Defunding Police Before She Was Against It

Another day, or these days an hour and there's another freakout over a Supreme Court ruling. Now it's&nbsp;Vega v. Tekoh. The case involved a paramedic accused of assaulting a patient. According to the&nbsp;deputy, Vega, the paramedic, Tekoh, came forward to admit his guilt, according to the paramedic, he was intimidated into doing so. The confession was not preceded by a Miranda warning. Since Vega's name is up there, the case, as you can guess, involved the deputy being sued.


	The case then became a proxy for a debate over Miranda and the decision into a freakout about the Supreme Court "taking away a constitutional right."


	Miranda was no more of a constitutional right than Roe v. Wade. It had a slightly better basis as an invented right, but <a href="https://archives.frontpagemag.com/fpm/premature-mirandizing-terrorist-daniel-greenfield/">not by that much</a>.

<blockquote>
	
		In 1963, the year that Lois Ann Jameson was walking home, there had been 222 rapes. Ten years later, that number would stand at 637. Today there are over 2,000 rapes a year in Phoenix; ten times as many. But one of those rapes would be hers. And it would lead to a new standard of protection for murderers and rapists.

	
		Ernesto Miranda wasn’t famous yet. The days when he would be selling autographed Miranda warning cards were still ahead of him. For now he was only another son of Mexican immigrants, a tattooed felon working temporary jobs and a rapist on the prowl.

	
		Miranda abducted the girl, drove her out to the desert and raped her. He was arrested, questioned and confessed to the crime. The rest should have been straightforward except that no one had told him that he was entitled to a lawyer. The head of the Phoenix office of the ACLU stepped in and the Miranda warning was born.

	
		Miranda v. Arizona&nbsp;was part of a string of decisions by the Warren Court that had begun the year of Lois Ann Jameson’s rape. The decisions invented rights which not only obligated taxpayers to provide accused criminals with lawyers, but also made it impossible to question a suspect without his lawyer.

	
		In the case of Lois Ann’s rapist, Justice Earl Warren went beyond inventing the right to a government lawyer, to invent the rapist’s right to be told of a right to a government lawyer.

	
		Warren inverted the Fifth Amendment to claim that the confession of a criminal who had not been told that he did not have to incriminate himself was a violation of the ban on self-incrimination. And he held that it should be assumed that all criminals did not know that they did not have to confess.
</blockquote>


	Miranda's premise, that criminals don't know they have a right not to incriminate themselves unless they're told about it ahead of time (or watch cop shows) and that therefore their confessions somehow violate the Fifth Amendment is absurd nonsense. If Tekoh were actually intimidated into confessing, that can be a case of being "compelled", but the presence or lack of a Miranda warning is a meaningless fetish.


	Justice Alito's ruling correctly notes that a Miranda warning is not the same thing as the Fifth Amendment.


	"Miranda did not hold that a violation of the rules it established necessarily constitute a Fifth Amendment violation, and it is difficult to see how it could have held otherwise," the ruling notes. "At no point in the opinion did the Court state that a violation of its new rules constituted a violation of the Fifth Amendment right against compelled self-incrimination.&nbsp; Instead, it claimed only that those rules were needed to safeguard that right during custodial interrogation."


	"In accordance with this understanding of the nature of the rules it imposed, the Miranda Court stated quite clearly that the Constitution did not itself require “adherence to any particular solution for the inherent compulsions of the interrogation process” and that its decision “in no way create[d] a constitutional straitjacket.”&nbsp; Ibid. The opinion added that its new rules might not be needed if Congress or the States adopted “other procedures which are at least as effective.”


	Compare this to the freakout over&nbsp;Vega v.&nbsp;Tekoh&nbsp;from the <a href="https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/06/miranda-warnings-supreme-court-alito-kagan.html">usual sources</a>.


	"The Supreme Court took the first steps toward overruling&nbsp;Miranda v. Arizona&nbsp;on Thursday, declaring that suspects have no constitutional right to receive the famed Miranda warnings when they’re taken into custody. Its 6–3 decision in&nbsp;Vega v. Tekoh&nbsp;ensures that many suspects who are denied these warnings will have no legal recourse, even if they are wrongly convicted. Justice Sam Alito’s opinion for the court lays the groundwork for a more direct assault on&nbsp;Miranda&nbsp;itself, barely concealing the conservative majority’s contempt for the decision," Mark Joseph Stern fulminates at Slate.


	An assault on what? Miranda is informational. Alito establishes that it was never a constitutional right, nor was it meant to be treated as one. Mistaking the paper for the principles is supposed to be an originalist fallacy, yet with Miranda, it's lefties who are guilty of it.

The Supreme Court is Right. Miranda is Not a Constitutional Right.

Another day, or these days an hour and there's another freakout over a Supreme Court ruling. Now it's&nbsp;Vega v. Tekoh. The case involved a paramedic accused

The Supreme Court is Right. Miranda is Not a Constitutional Right. 

Ever since the Washington Post decided to give Qatari agent Jamal Khasoggi a forum, they've been riding that train. And the Amazon Post is determined not to stop advocating the Islamist cause in D.C.


	Here is its latest bid.

<blockquote>
	
		Biden must not betray defenders of democracy in Saudi Arabia&nbsp; - Abdullah Alaoudh /&nbsp;Washington Post:
</blockquote>


	Who is Abdullah?

<blockquote>
	
		&nbsp;Abdullah Alaoudh is director of research for the gulf region at Democracy for the Arab World Now
</blockquote>


	Here's a refresher of what DAWN is courtesy of the <a href="https://www.meforum.org/61908/dc-acquires-yet-another-disinformation-thinktank">Middle East Forum</a>.

<blockquote>
	
		Among DAWN's inaugural&nbsp;publications&nbsp;is a presentation of the extremist Saudi cleric, Salman Al-Odah, as an innocent reformist, persecuted by the Saudi government for mere political dissent.&nbsp;According to DAWN, the charges brought by a Saudi court against Al-Odah in 2018 are an attempt to punish his "peaceful speech advocating reforms."

	
		Al-Odah was first jailed in the 1990s after he called on his followers to&nbsp;engage in jihad&nbsp;in Afghanistan and Iraq. Al-Odah even&nbsp;served&nbsp;at one point as a&nbsp;mentor&nbsp;to Al-Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden. He claimed to have moderated while in jail. But in 2005, he again&nbsp;issued a call for jihad&nbsp;in Iraq. Since then, in 2012, he insisted that the Holocaust was exaggerated and turned into a "myth"&nbsp;
</blockquote>


	Not surprising as Jamal Khashoggi had some of the same views and was a good friend of Osama bin Laden.

<blockquote>
	
		One&nbsp;board member&nbsp;is Asim Ghafoor. In filed corporation documents, DAWN is registered to his address.&nbsp;Presented&nbsp;as a leading attorney on "high-profile cases related to national security and terrorism," Ghafoor in fact worked for and represented several prominent Al Qaeda charities subsequently designated by the U.S. government.&nbsp;

	
		Ghafoor also&nbsp;represented&nbsp;the U.S. branch of the Saudi Al Haramain Foundation (AHF) charity, which&nbsp;was designated in 2004. An investigation run by the IRS, FBI and ICE found that the charity's U.S. branch had "direct links" to bin Laden.
</blockquote>


	Not surprising again considering Qatar's links to the Taliban, Hamas and Al Qaeda.


	This is what Jeff Bezos' paper is promoting in D.C. This is its idea of democracy in the middle east.

Washington Post Gives Al Qaeda Apologists a Platform to Call for "Democracy"

Ever since the Washington Post decided to give Qatari agent Jamal Khasoggi a forum, they've been riding that train. And the Amazon Post is determined not to

Washington Post Gives Al Qaeda Apologists a Platform to Call for "Democracy"

Matt Walsh's New Documentary Asks: What Is a Woman?

What Is a Woman? is a June, 2022 Daily Wire documentary addressing trans extremism. It's directed by Justin Folk. Folk has worked on major Hollywood releases

How to Hate White, Christian, Heterosexual, American Men

I was listening to WNYC, a National Public Radio affiliate in New York City. The station is so left it's a safe assumption that the break room includes a

The Truth and Beauty

The Truth and Beauty: How the Lives and Works of England's Greatest Poets Point the Way to a Deeper Understanding of the Words of Jesus is an April, 2022

Anxiety in America

"I want to run away," I posted on Facebook after I heard about the white supremacist Buffalo, New York, grocery store shooting, followed quickly by the

I Am a Woman and You Do Not Speak for Me

This essay is not an argument for or against legal abortion. I think, for reasons I won't detail here, that abortion should be legal. Even if Roe is overturned

Nazi Billionaires: The Dark History of Germany's Wealthiest Dynasties

The photo stops you. It's a black-and-white head shot of a 35-year-old man with jet black hair. He's handsome, and he's staring straight at you. He's wearing

A Professor Passes Down the Legacy of Western Civilization and Disciplined Inquiry

Professor Josephine K surveyed her classroom. It was ugly. The cinder block walls were painted the gray-green of old pus. A misguided architect had placed this

Darwinian Racism: How Darwinism Influenced Hitler, Nazism and White Nationalism

Suffering is a commodity. Two recent events demonstrated this. On March 27, 2022, Will Smith slapped Chris Rock at the Academy Awards. Many prominent African

How to Save or Destroy an American City

I was in the midst of another cancer scare. Imaging tests were ordered, and then blood tests. No cancer – Yay! – but the blood tests revealed that I needed to

The Woke Backlash Against Ukraine

Societies and individual lives run on narrative. Narratives decide what stories we are allowed to tell, what characters we populate those stories with, what

Lee Strobel's 'The Case for Heaven' Presents a Christian View of Death

If I knew that I was about to die, I would buy a pound of macadamia nuts, and then go to a pet store and scoop up every puppy in the place, and spend my

Robert Spencer's 'The Critical Qur'an'

[Robert Spencer's new book, The Critical&nbsp;Qur'an, will be out May 3. Preorder now: HERE.]


	If I were&nbsp;queen, I&nbsp;would reward&nbsp;every&nbsp;

"I Wish I Could Make You Cry over Robert Cuadra As You Cried over George Floyd."

Dear Collette,


	For the past four days, I've been thinking about writing this letter. I couldn't write earlier because I was crying. Four days ago, I got

Woke Racism

John McWhorter is a professor of linguistics, American studies, and music history at Columbia University. He has also published in numerous prestigious outlets

The Power of the Dog

Eight people, three dogs, multiple cats and reptiles, in a tiny house with one bathroom. The TV was black-and-white, with a screen not much bigger than many

Editor's note: The management of the Breakers Hotel in Palm Beach, Florida <a href="https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/11/naming-enemy-frontpagemagcom/">recently informed</a> the David Horowitz Freedom Center that the hotel will no longer host the Center's Restoration Weekend, which it had done for 19 of the 27 years the Center has held the annual event. The Breakers' management now states that the Center is too controversial, and therefore cannot be welcomed back again. 


	Below, Frontpage Contributor Danusha Goska shares the thoughts she expressed to the Breakers management. We encourage our readers to respectfully do the same at: guestrelations@thebreakers.com.


	* * * 
	Dear Paul N. Leone and Tricia Taylor,


	I hope I am addressing this note to the correct persons. I hope to reach the managers of the Breakers Hotel.


	I don't know the Breakers' managers, but I will wager that you are connoisseurs. Who but a connoisseur could create and animate so exquisite an experience as is offered at the Breakers? I imagine that you are reflected in every taste of the cuisine, in the selection of every libation, the positioning of every chair, the petals in every bouquet, and the professionalism of the staff. I have no idea who you are, and yet I am in awe of you. You are maestros, conducting a magnificent orchestra.


	I have traveled the world and have accepted many accommodations, from the Taj Palace in Mumbai to a smokey, clay-floored Tibetan home high in the Himalaya, where the wife and her two husbands drank yak butter tea cooked over an open fire as a blizzard raged just beyond the fragile, thangka-bedecked walls. The Breakers provided me with one of the most memorable roofs under which I have slept.


	I first visited your hotel in 2016, when I was a speaker at the David Horowitz Freedom Center Restoration Weekend. I attended again this year. I learned that The Breakers no longer wishes to host the David Horowitz Freedom Center, because there is an accusation that the DHFC is "white supremacist." Please hear me as one American citizen to another. Please hear me as a customer who cares about where her money is spent, and who is aware of outraged consumers' rising tide of resistance against corporations that surrender to Woke intimidation.


	I am a first generation American. I am Catholic and physically handicapped. My first job after college was teaching in a remote village in the Central African Republic, then rated the poorest country on earth. After that, I taught in Nepal, a similarly poor country. I currently live in Paterson, New Jersey. Paterson and the Breakers have this in common – both played a role in the Negro Leagues. Otherwise, we are very different. Paterson is a majority-minority city. Paterson, a heroin hub, is ranked one of the ten most dangerous small cities in the US. Thirty percent of our population lives, as I do, below the poverty line. I teach majority-minority students. I have had numerous "black and brown" friends, bosses, and coworkers. White supremacists don't associate with people like me. In fact they harass and kill people like me.


	I spoke at the Breakers in 2016 at the personal invitation of David Horowitz. I spoke about my "black and brown" students. I spoke about their hardships and their hopes. I spoke about the daily realities of life for poor minorities in cities like Paterson, NJ. I did all this in your hotel. How often have you invited people like me to talk in the Breakers about the plight of poor black people? I would guess rarely, if ever. Would a white supremacist invite such a talk at his conference? We both know the answer.


	Indeed, David Horowitz has devoted his entire life to lifting people up, not putting people down, including black people. When he was younger, he worked with and for the Black Panthers. This was because he wanted to help black people, and he thought that leftist solutions were the way to do so. He discovered that the Panthers had tortured and murdered his friend and fellow Black Panther supporter, Betty Van Patter, and rather than slinking away from danger and controversy, as many would do, David worked for justice for Betty. This is not the behavior of a white supremacist.


	David is the proud and loving father-in-law of an African American daughter-in-law and grandfather to grandchildren with African ancestry. And, of course, David is a proud Jew. Again, white supremacists don't support people like David Horowitz. White supremacists kill people like David Horowitz.


	At the 2021 conference, I was not a speaker, but I did make a brief, pubic comment after scholar Heather MacDonald spoke. Heather MacDonald writes about what I live: the violent crime wave that is consuming African Americans and others in cities like Paterson. I took the mic and spoke about my student, whom I identified only as K. K was a gang member. He acknowledged selling crack cocaine to black mothers in front of their children. He never attended class and did no work. He was young, healthy, tall, and muscular. One might think that K was a happy-go-lucky guy, living the gangsta dream.


	In fact K used to come to my office hours and cry in my arms. I'm not talking about sniffles. I'm talking about sobs. K had no idea who his parents were. He was raised by a kindly neighbor lady who died. Her family moved on her possessions and K was homeless. The gang was his only family.


	I used to think that left-wing solutions would rescue young men like K. David Horowitz's work turned me around, after a lifetime of being left-wing. I began to realize that conservative solutions like intact families, delayed gratification, and self-discipline were the road to a better life, or even just mere survival, for the millions of K's out there.


	I said this in my brief comment after Heather MacDonald's talk.


	All weekend long, conference attendees approached me. Many of these attendees were teachers; others were physicians. They pulled me aside and told me of their own efforts to help the K's that they know. One doctor moved me deeply by telling me about his efforts to help black heroin addicts and even black burglars attempting to rob his exclusive, gated Florida community. The teachers told me of their efforts to help failing students with enrichment materials and mentorship. They met only road blocks from left-wing administrators who wanted no part of right-wing solutions. Not a few of these conference attendees broke into tears while telling me of their thwarted efforts to reach out. That's what goes on at a David Horowitz conference. Caring people networking on how to help the K's of this world. That's what your hotel hosted this past weekend.


	Please do not malign these American citizens, who, I have to guess, are doing work that you yourself are not doing. Yes, you are doing good work. The world needs beautiful hotels. The world also needs people willing to enter dangerous, abandoned urban neighborhoods and reach out to children who are just about doomed by a culture of violence and hopelessness, and paralyzed by self-flattering lies from white leftists who insist that poor black people are helpless victims, that America is a racist wasteland, that blacks can do nothing to help themselves, that they all must wait patiently for the white leftist savior to shower them with government programs that will somehow deliver the salvation that government programs have promised and not delivered since the presidency of Lyndon Baines Johnson.


	David Horowitz and every one of the Restoration Weekend speakers believe that African Americans can lift themselves up just as other oppressed groups have done. Jason L. Riley, himself a black man, provides ample statistics to prove this empowering message in his aptly titled book, "Please Stop Helping Us: How Liberals Make It Harder for Blacks to Succeed." This message is also supported by other black conservatives like Shelby Steele, Candace Owens, Thomas Sowell, John McWhorter, Christine Williams, Jason D. Hill, and too many others to mention. By the way, Christine Williams and Jason D. Hill, both black, write for David Horowitz's publication Front Page Magazine.


	Look. We all know what's happening here. The left can't debate David Horowitz on ideas, so it slanders him with false accusations of racism. The real victims are those who would be helped by Horowitz's ideas, but who never encounter them, because of intimidation and silencing, an intimidation and silencing you appear to participate in. If that is truly your decision, you are covering your own exquisite derrieres, while sabotaging my young, black neighbors.


	In the 1950s, during the Red Scare, Hollywood studios stopped hiring fine actors like John Garfield, not because of the quality of his product, but because he had been identified as potential Communist. Villagers in sixteenth-century Germany knew that that elderly beggar woman in town was no witch, but they knew if they came to her defense, they'd come under the harsh light of suspicion, too. In 2006, Duke University administrators joined in the attack when its lacrosse players were accused, utterly falsely, of rape. The accused were completely exonerated, but no matter. Their names were dragged through the mud, and their university betrayed them. We now look back at human behavior during all these panics and we feel contempt for those who chose to play the role of a cowardly weasel.


	Yes, the Breakers is lovely. I have spent many a happy moment lost in contemplating its architecture, its row of palms full of parrots. I saw my first living shark my final night at the breakers in 2016. The shark was illuminated by the Breakers' flood lights that transform the hem of the Atlantic Ocean into a lacy turquoise fringe.


	As with a lovely face, it takes more than external appearances for beauty to rise to transcendence. When we gaze upon the bust of Nefertiti, it's not just her elegant neck, her smooth cheek, that enchant us, and generations of humans going back thousands of years. Nefertiti looks, simply, like something more than a beauty. She looks thoughtful. She looks kind. It's not any exaggeration to say that Nefertiti looks like she has integrity. It is that inner integrity, reflected through the magic of artistry, that has made Nefertiti the object of human awe for millennia.


	The Breakers is pretty, but ranked, as it is, on the National Register of Historic Places, it can and should be more. Its lovely bones should express integrity. You, Paul N. Leone and Tricia Taylor, can manifest that integrity. I ask that you do. I ask in the name of David Horowitz, a good and compassionate man who invited a low-income former Peace Corps Volunteer to attend his conference so she could talk about her "black and brown" students living in one of America's ten most dangerous small cities. I ask in the name of my student, K. Thank you for considering this request.


	Danusha Goska is the author of <a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.amazon.com/God-Through-Binoculars-Hitchhiker-Monastery/dp/1947067613&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1637413795820000&amp;usg=AOvVaw3TwEVJjd3fuMSrklJETNFL" href="https://www.amazon.com/God-Through-Binoculars-Hitchhiker-Monastery/dp/1947067613" target="_blank">God through Binoculars: A Hitchhiker at a Monastery.</a>

A Letter to the Management of the Breakers Hotel in Palm Beach

Editor's note: The management of the Breakers Hotel in Palm Beach, Florida recently informed the David Horowitz Freedom Center that the hotel will no longer

Did Muhammad Exist?

[Order Robert Spencer's updated and expanded book, Did Muhammad Exist? An Inquiry into Islam's Obscure Origins.]


	Historicity is the quality of being

A Former Peace Corps Volunteer Responds to News from Afghanistan

Facebook friend David was talking about how great it is to be a Marine. David uses present tense, even though it's been years since he's been in uniform. There

An Inconvenient Minority

I approached this lecture, semester after semester, with the focus of a medieval knight challenging the dragon threatening to incinerate the village. I needed

NPR Attacks Tom Hanks' 'Whiteness'

Tom Hanks is the highest-grossing non-superhero American film star. Hanks has received enough honors and awards to fill twelve Wikipedia pages. Hanks is

Frontpage Mag

danusha v. goska

Matt Walsh's New Documentary Asks: What Is a Woman?

How to Hate White, Christian, Heterosexual, American Men

The Truth and Beauty

Anxiety in America

I Am a Woman and You Do Not Speak for Me

Nazi Billionaires: The Dark History of Germany's Wealthiest Dynasties

A Professor Passes Down the Legacy of Western Civilization and Disciplined Inquiry

Darwinian Racism: How Darwinism Influenced Hitler, Nazism and White Nationalism

How to Save or Destroy an American City

The Woke Backlash Against Ukraine

Lee Strobel's 'The Case for Heaven' Presents a Christian View of Death

Robert Spencer's 'The Critical Qur'an'

"I Wish I Could Make You Cry over Robert Cuadra As You Cried over George Floyd."

Woke Racism

The Power of the Dog

A Letter to the Management of the Breakers Hotel in Palm Beach

Did Muhammad Exist?

A Former Peace Corps Volunteer Responds to News from Afghanistan

An Inconvenient Minority

NPR Attacks Tom Hanks' 'Whiteness'

FPM Series

Disloyal Military

Progressive Fascists

Racist Mayors

The Point

Supreme Court Turns Over Abortion Question to the People. Democrats Rage Against Democracy.

Demolishing the Infinite CO2 Argument

Stacey Abrams Was For Defunding Police Before She Was Against It

The Supreme Court is Right. Miranda is Not a Constitutional Right.

Washington Post Gives Al Qaeda Apologists a Platform to Call for "Democracy"

Events