Imagine a Republican House member suggesting that any criticism of white supremacist protests at synagogues will force members of the hate group to resort to violence against Jews.
Now just flip it around and watch the media cheer as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez say the same thing in defense of BDS.
Specifically, Cortez said, ““My concern with being overly punitive on nonviolent forms of protest is that it forces people into other channels and I would hate to be a part of, you know, paving that kind of path.”
The anti-Semitic leftist radical was referring to a House resolution criticizing the anti-Semitic BDS movement.
What other channels is Cortez referring to? The contrast with “nonviolent forms of protest” is rather clear. If you don’t accept BDS, get ready for the bombs and bullets. (Which are being employed anyway.)
Let me translate this: AOC just said that a non-binding resolution stating the House’s opposition to the anti-semitic BDS movement will “force” people into terrorism. Among other things a stunning indictment of the anti-Israel movement — a Kinsleyan gaffe. https://t.co/Ypt2iik7bs
— Noah Pollak (@NoahPollak) July 24, 2019
As Noah Pollak points out, “Let me translate this: AOC just said that a non-binding resolution stating the House’s opposition to the anti-semitic BDS movement will “force” people into terrorism. Among other things a stunning indictment of the anti-Israel movement — a Kinsleyan gaffe.”
But the media will once again pretend that the “squad”, whose members have gone beyond anti-Semitism to threatening violence against Jews, are the victims here.
Leave a Reply